The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

FDR Law

21 BOLD STREET, WARRINGTON, WA1 1DG, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 01925 230000
Fax:
Fax 01925 414330
DX:
17758 WARRINGTON

FDR Law provides a comprehensive legal service for commercial organisations and private clients. Its commercial client base includes international, UK national and regional businesses with turnover of up to ÂŁ120m.

The firm: FDR Law was formed in July 2008 with the merger of Warrington's largest legal practices: Forshaws and Davies Ridgway. The history of these firms can be traced back as far as 1750. The current business has grown to include 12 partners and 100+ employees based at offices in Warrington, Stockton Heath and Frodsham, as well as a facility in London.

The firm specialises in the areas of commercial business services (particularly commercial property and corporate transactions), and private client services as trustees and advisors to a number of high-value multi-jurisdictional trusts. It also undertakes litigation, family law and bespoke high-value residential property work. Major clients include Bako North Western Group Limited, Knowsley MBC, Langtree Property Partners Limited, Network Space Group Limited and United Utilities Group PLC.

FDR Law prides itself on being a progressive, competent and reputable firm.

Types of work undertaken: Commercial property: investment; commercial development (public and private sectors; residential development and strategic land; restructuring; and tenancy agreements.

Corporate: mergers; acquisitions and disposals; private equity; MBOs and MBIs; and banking and security.

Commercial: commercial agreements; corporate governance; partnerships and LLPs; intellectual property; and notarial services.

Business start-ups and company information: company formation and structures; shareholder agreements; joint ventures; and terms and conditions of trade.

Commercial litigation and dispute resolution: corporate and shareholder disputes; property disputes; construction litigation, including adjudication, arbitration and expert determination; professional negligence; and ADR.

Construction and engineering: contracts and project documents, collateral warranties, appointments and security documentation and construction disputes.

Employment (corporate): terms and contracts of employment; disciplinary procedures and disputes; TUPE transfers ; HR consultancy; and in-house training.

Employment (personal): redundancy; discrimination at work; employment tribunals; grievance and disciplinary procedures; contracts of employment; tribunal representation; settlement agreements; and TUPE claims.

Insolvency: corporate recovery and re-structures, corporate re-structures; personal insolvency; voluntary arrangements.

Private Client: wills; trusts; probate; estate planning; court of protection, powers of attorney; and will and inheritance disputes.

Litigation and disputes: personal injury claims; road traffic accidents; clinical negligence; brain injuries; dental injury claims; bed sore claims; equine and animal disputes; will and inheritance disputes; and property disputes.

Family: divorce and separation; financial arrangements, arrangements for children, domestic abuse, €™prenuptial agreements and child maintenance.

Conveyancing: buying; selling; property disputes; leasehold; lease extensions; enfranchisment; and inheritance disputes.

Crime: arrest and prosecution; and motoring offences.

Other offices: Stockton Heath, Frodsham, London (by appointment only)

 

  • Number of UK partners: 12
  • Number of other UK fee-earners: 28
  • Breakdown of work %
  • 

  • Commercial: 34
  • Residential property: 18
  • Private client/trusts: 16
  • Family: 12
  • Litigation: 10
  • Criminal: 10




  • Languages
  • English

Above material supplied by FDR Law.

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Gulbenkian Andonain discuss NEW Tier 1 Start-Up Visa and the NEW Tier 1 Innovator Visa

    The document entitled "Statement of Changes to Immigration Rules" which was released by the House of Commons on the 7th March 2019, outlined and advised us on a number of changes that will come into place that will affect the Tier 1 Investor Visa amongst other visa programmes and schemes. The latest article on our website discusses both of these new UK business visa routes. Our immigration lawyers London are already up to date on all of the required information for both the NEW Tier 1 Start-Up Visa and the NEW Tier 1 Innovator Visa .
  • Upcoming Changes to the UK Tier 1 Investor Visa

    According to the new document from the House of Commons on March 7th 2019 titled “Statement of Changes to Immigration Rules”, a number of changes will come into place that affecting the Tier 1 UK Investor Visa programme amongst other visa programmes and schemes. Read about them in our latest  article . 
  • Brexit and non-EU Immigration

    There is no doubt that the UK has to date benefited immensely from visa-free EU immigration to the extent that visa conditions and caps on non-EU migrant have undermined and overshadowed the ability of this group to play a prominent role in British industry and commerce and in its expanding and overburdened NHS service. It is the view of  Gulbenkian Andonian  however, that after  Brexit, there should be a noticeable change in those skilled non-EU migrants contributing to British society in a meaningful way. 
  • Gulbenkian Andonian Solicitors discuss Post Brexit scenarios - EU Nationals and Salient Immigration

    From 1 January 2021 everyone except for British and Irish citizens will be subject to immigration control in the UK.   Gulbenkian Andonian solicitors has already published an article on this topic of post- Brexit immigration and has discussed the case of EU nationals and family members after Brexit, you can find that article here as one of many in our blog .
  • DEFERRED PROSECUTION AGREEMENTS: THE BEST OPTION? OR A FLAWED IDEA?

    Tescoadmitted wrongdoing over its accounting scandal in order to obtain a deferredprosecution agreement and avoid a conviction. But with everyone charged overthe scandal having been cleared, Aziz Rahman examines whether the deferredprosecution agreement process needs revising.
  • DEFERRED PROSECUTION AGREEMENTS: OBTAINING ONE AND SEEING IT THROUGH TO COMPLETION

    With Standard Bank having become the first organisation to conclude a DPA, Aziz Rahman explains why gaining one is only the start of the challenge.
  • DISMISSAL AT NISSAN AND WORKPLACE CRIME PREVENTION

    The sacking of Nissan’s high-profile chairman may have beenproof that nobody is infallible. But Nicola Sharp argues that it should also beseen as an indicator that no company can be considered safe from wrongdoing.
  • Applying for A Sole Representative Visa

    Regardless of the Brexit outcome, the United Kingdom will remain one of the world most powerful economies. With a market of 65 million people and close ties with Europe, many overseas-based organisations look to establishing a subsidiary or branch office in Britain.
  • BRIBERY ALLEGATIONS IN MORE THAN ONE JURISDICTION: THE IMPORTANCE OF ENSURING A JOINED-UP DEFENCE AP

    Aziz Rahman considers the Ericsson bribery investigation and outlines how best to respond if you are investigated by more than one law enforcement agency
  • Have Changes to The Spouse/Civil Partnership Minimum Income Threshold Made A Difference?

    The plight of those denied a UK Spouse/CivilPartnership Visa or a Spouse/Civil Partnership Visa extension continues to feature in the headlines.   In August 2018, the Guardian reported on one young woman, driven to attempt suicide after her fiancé, an Albanian national, was not permitted to enter the country.   The Home Office ruled Paige Smith, a British Citizen, did not meet the £18,600 income threshold.   It later transpired the Home Office lost a crucial payslip proving that Ms Smith met the criteria, a document the department had been sent four times by a Solicitor and Ms Smith’s MP.   The appeal Judge took ten minutes to rule the Visa should have been approved; however, the couple still had to wait two months for the Home Office to declare it would not appeal the decision.