The Legal 500

Abel & Imray

20 RED LION STREET, LONDON, WC1R 4PQ, ENGLAND
Munich, London, Cardiff, Bath

What we say about the firm's legal practice in London

TMT (technology, media and telecoms)

Within Patent and trade mark attorneys: The Regions, Abel & Imray is a second tier firm,

Abel & Imray has a team of 15 attorneys across Bath and Cardiff. The ‘excellent’ Julian Bardo leads the physics, engineering and IT group as well as the trade marks team; and Ceris Humphreys leads the chemical and biotech group. The firm is developing its aerospace and defence sector client base, acting for BAE and Cassidian. New clients include Amputees in Action and Planet Earth Instituto. Matthew Critten and Jim Denness are also recommended.

Within Patent attorneys: London, Abel & Imray is a second tier firm,

Abel & Imray has expertise in the areas of hi-tech and chemistry, and a niche focus in biotechnology. Representative clients include international and domestic companies such as ExxonMobil and Norgine Limited, as well as academic institutions such as Imperial College and Yale University. Sue Scott is ‘all strength and no weaknesses’.

Within Trade mark attorneys: London, Abel & Imray is a third tier firm,

Abel & Imray has particular expertise in the publishing world, acting for clients such as Time Out, and on Future Publishing’s entire portfolio. Other clients include Bayer, Novartis and Texas Instruments. ‘Proactive and straight to the point’, Simon Bentley handles contentious matters, and recently represented The Callista Group in a successful opposition.


Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • HOUSING

    In Nzinga Maswaku v Westminster City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 669 the Court of Appeal clarified that in offering a homeless person with alternative temporary accommodation the local authority is obliged to point that if the offer is refused it has discharged its Part VII duties under the Housing Act 1996.
    - 11KBW
  • COUNCIL TAX

    In Harrow LBC v Ayiku [2012] EWHC 1200 (Admin) Sales J held that the word “or” in the Council Tax (Exempt Dwellings) Order 1992, art 3 Class N, had a disjunctive meaning, therefore it was sufficient for the non-British spouse of a foreign student to satisfy one or other of the two conditions, namely being prevented from taking paid employment or being prevented from claiming benefits, in order to qualify as a “relevant person” who was exempted from liability to pay council tax.
    - 11KBW
  • QUEEN’S SPEECH

    Bills already introduced pursuant to the Queen’s Speech on 9 May 2012 include Local Government Finance Bill and Electoral Registration and Administration Bill, both accompanied by Explanatory Notes, which in each case address ECHR compatibility.
    - 11KBW
  • Standards

    In R (Calver) v Adjudication Panel for Wales [2012] EWHC 1172 (Admin) Mr Calver was a member of Manorbier Community Council who successfully challenged the decision of the Panel to dismiss his appeal against a decision by Prembrokeshire County Council Standards Committee censuring him for a number of comments or blogs posted by him on a website he owned and controlled.
    - 11KBW
  • A justified retrospective

    Clive Sheldon - QC debates the pros & cons of retrospective tax legislation
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty (“PSED”)

    In R (Greenwich Community Law Centre) v Greenwich LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 496 the Court of Appeal held that the Council had had “due regard to the PSED when making changes to its funding of community legal advice services”. At para 30 Elias LJ said:
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty

    Surrey County Council conducted a review of its Library Service. This culminated in a Report to the Council’s Cabinet. The Recommendations in the Report included that there should be consultation about a community-partnership approach at selected Libraries.
    - 11KBW
  • Judicial Review

    The Judgment of Lindblom J in The Manydown Co Ltd v Basingstoke and Deane BC [2012] EWHC 977 (Admin) repays attention. The Claimant sought to challenge by judicial review 2 decisions of the Council: (1) the Council’s refusal to reconsider its position on the development of a site that it owns (and is the subject matter of a Joint Development Partnership Agreement with the Claimant); and (2) a decision of the Council’s Cabinet approving a selection of sites for development which did not include this site.
    - 11KBW
  • The Health and Social Care Act 2012: impact on adult social services

    After its torrid passage through Parliament, the Health and Social Care Bill received Royal Assent on 27 March 2012. The Act deals principally with healthcare reform, but it also contains some amendments to the legislative framework for social care. It will come into force on a day yet to be appointed by the Secretary of State.
    - 11KBW
  • Immigration update May 2012

    In this issue: