The Legal 500

D Young & Co LLP

120 HOLBORN, LONDON, EC1N 2DY, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7269 8500
Fax:
Fax 020 7269 8555
DX:
0078 LONDON/CHANCERY LN
Web:
www.dyoung.com
Email:
Southampton, London, Dubai

Catherine Mallalieu

Tel:
Work +44 20 7269 8550
Email:
D Young & Co LLP

Work Department

Patents - biotechnology, chemistry and pharmaceuticals group.

Position

Catherine has represented clients before the EPO since 1991. She has an enviable direct client list and substantial experience in successfully defending and opposing patents at the EPO in the petrochemical, agrochemical and therapeutic arenas. In addition to multi-party oppositions, Catherine has taken a coordinating role in pan-European litigation. As well as large organisations, Catherine enjoys working directly with emerging companies, in areas such as gene therapy, natural products, pharmaceuticals, diagnostics, catalysis, to build value through their IP portfolio. This has often involved IP due diligence for mergers, project acquisitions and flotations. Particularly, through her work on bioinformatics-based and vaccine cases, Catherine has gained experience at all levels before the EPO concerning the amount of data needed to file a patent application. Along with Charles Harding, Catherine has been involved in a number of strategic oppositions for Oxford Biomedica. Catherine continues to successfully represent Martek Biosciences Corporation in Europe and has recently successfully maintained a patent before the EPO Board of Appeal (T-0261/08) against an opposition by a commercial competitor. This was a seminal case on commercial production of micro-organisms for obtaining beneficial omega-3 fatty acids. The case also decided that the status of an opposition can be passed to a universal successor. She is also involved, with Charles Harding and Zije Clyde-Watson in advising Merial on a pan European litigation relating to Frontline TM and Frontline Plus TM (veterinary products containing fipronil for treating fleas in cats and dogs). The FR limb of the litigation was successful - at both the Court of First Instance and on appeal. The DE limb of this litigation will go to trial in July 2012 and the UK limb of this litigation is expected to continue into 2012. Catherine has acquired the following new clients this year: Vitaflo International and Great Ormond Street Hospital. In 2010, Catherine and Simon O'Brien were involved in the due diligence associated with the completion of a share capital increase, with acquisition of new financial resources of €57.8m, for Molmed SPA. Catherine heads a team serving clients which include Oxford Biomedica, Martek Biosciences Corporation, MolMed SPA, Lubrizol and Fondazione Centro San Raffaele Del Monte Tabor. Catherine is regularly recommended in independent legal publications. Legal 500 2011 stated: "On the life sciences side, Catherine Mallalieu is 'very reliable' and has an 'excellent legal and scientific background'". In 2010 Catherine was referred to by Legal 500 as "'excellent' on pharmaceutical and biotech matters" (Legal 500 2010). Catherine has also been "singled out for praise" by Chambers in 2010 and is "clearly in the premier league of patent attorneys covering biotech in the UK" according to the Managing Intellectual Property (MIP) IP Handbook 2010.

Career

European patent attorney 1991; chartered patent attorney 1991; European design attorney. D Young & Co, partner 1997; Catherine had in-house patent experience with Zeneca Agrochemicals with particular responsibility for their bioscience division and in their insecticide division.

Member

Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA) and the CIPA patents committee; European Patent Institute (epi); American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA).

Education

University of Birmingham (BSc in Chemistry).

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Jersey Royal Court considers measure of damages for dilapidations claims

    In the absence of any statutory provision in Jersey addressing how dilapidations claims are to be quantified, the Royal Court's decision in JSSL v Barclays has provided some much needed guidance, particularly in circumstances where there is an acceptance that works to redress dilapidations have not been and will not be carried out.
  • English Supreme Court rules on Mistake and Hastings Bass

    On 9 May 2013 the English Supreme Court handed down a unanimous judgment on the seminal cases of Pitt-v- Holt and Futter -v- Futter , with Lord Walker's valedictory judgment conclusively resolving the English position on the rule in Hastings Bass and rescission on the ground of mistake.
  • Getting the breaks

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • Product liability and dietary supplements

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • The calm before 
the storm: are 
you prepared for 
a dawn raid?

    WilmerHale currently authors the Fraud and Corporate Crime section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • International shipment of waste: transporters beware

    Burges Salmon LLP currently authors the Environment and Energy section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here
  • Cyprus Shipping Industry : Business as usual. Why despite recent events Cyprus remains an internatio

    Cyprus is the third most populated island in the Mediterranean Sea. It is strategically located at the crossroads of Europe, Africa and the Middle East. Traditionally Cyprus has always been at the heart of the seafaring trade and therefore always functioned as an important centre for trade and commerce. Today as a member of the European Union it remains an optimal business base. It is one of the most attractive locations for foreign investments worldwide. Foreign companies have been given the opportunity to invest and establish business in Cyprus on equal terms with local investors as no distinction is made between foreign and Cypriot companies.
  • FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

    The excellent support system in combination with the ideal jurisdiction provided in Cyprus set the country in the list of the most desirable countries through which you can offer foreign exchange operations. In addition, the accession of Cyprus within the European Union and, most importantly, the extremely beneficial economic advantages available due to the low costs and the outstanding taxation, create a covetable environment for foreign investors.
  • National public order. Adoption of the Draft

    The Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation (hereinafter - SCC RF) adopted by the Informative Letter No. 156 dated the 26th of February, 2013 (hereinafter - the Informative Letter) on Review of the consideration by arbitrazh courts of the cases on the implementation of the public order clause as the ground for rejection of the recognition and enforcement of the foreign court decisions and arbitral awards.
  • China Customs New Interpretation

    For many products, tariff classification can be technically complex, confusing, and subject to multiple interpretations. Often several different Harmonized System Codes ("HS Code") may seem applicable for one given product with different tariff rates. Tariff classification is indeed a process of application of customs classification rules, including customs rulings and decisions, and misclassification may trigger severe legal consequences. The sad fact is, unfortunately, that many companies rely on non-legal professionals to determine the HS Codes for imports or exports. A recent interpretation issued by the General Administration of Customs of China ("GACC") (Circular No. [2012] 495 Shu-Fa-Fa) (the "Interpretation") reinforces the process of tariff classification as a legal matter, and formulates the test as to what counts for regulatory violation if tariff classification rules are improperly applied by the importer or exporter in a given case. If the legal defense is successful, misclassification may only be treated as a non-violation misclassification, with the possible obligation to pay up additional customs duties, if any, but without administrative or criminal consequences. The Interpretation took effect as from February 1, 2013.