The Legal 500

Work 029 2048 2288
Fax 029 2049 5588



  • Wales: Overview >


Within Public sector, Acuity Legal Limited is a second tier firm,

Deryn Rees and Craig Griffiths at Acuity Legal Limited are leading commercial and public law advisers, with ‘deep and current knowledge of public contracts' and outstanding strength in procurement. The firm advises West Sussex County Council across a range of areas, including healthcare and education.

[back to top]

Wales: Corporate and commercial

Within Corporate and commercial: Cardiff and South Wales, Acuity Legal Limited is a second tier firm,

Acuity Legal Limited is ‘in a league of its own for corporate and commercial work in South Wales'; it is ‘always in control'. International transactional expert Paul Lowe joined from Eversheds LLP, in a significant hire which bolsters an already impressive team. The ‘extremely knowledgeable' and ‘responsive' Stephen Berry is highly respected, and Rachelle Sellek is also recommended. Significant instructions in 2013 came from Mansford Helios/Verdion Properties, LifeCare Residences, IQE plc, and Eco 2.

[back to top]

Wales: Dispute resolution

Within Commercial litigation, Acuity Legal Limited is a third tier firm,

Lyndon Richards heads the team at Acuity Legal Limited, and his background in construction disputes is an asset to a firm with such a strong renewables and property development/regeneration client base. Gareth Roberts has been promoted to associate, while John Morris has left the practice.

[back to top]

Wales: Finance

Within Banking and finance, Acuity Legal Limited is a third tier firm,

Acuity Legal Limited saw the arrival in 2013 of Paul Lowe, previously head of corporate finance at Eversheds LLP. The banking team, led by Beverley Jones, is ‘very responsive and always commercial', and acts for lenders and borrowers. Standout work in 2013 included funding advice to IQE plc, LifeCare Residences, and West Sussex Council. Gareth Baker was promoted to partner.

[back to top]

Wales: Human resources

Within Employment: Cardiff, tier 4

James Moss heads the team at Acuity Legal Limited, which advises public and private sector employers on strategic, TUPE and contentious issues. Moss is recommended for contentious work, and is noted for his ‘expert knowledge' and ‘robust representation'.

[back to top]

Wales: Overview

Wales: Private client

Within Charities and not-for-profit, Acuity Legal Limited is a third tier firm,

Acuity Legal Limited advises charities on a range of commercial issues. Craig Griffiths advises charity and staff mutual Aspire, including advising on governance and property issues in 2013.

[back to top]

Wales: Projects, energy and natural resources

Within Project finance and PFI, Acuity Legal Limited is a third tier firm,

Christian Farrow heads the team at Acuity Legal Limited, which provides ‘City-level service at provincial prices'. It advised longstanding client Eco2 Ltd on the sale of its biomass plant in Lincolnshire, for more than £160m; and acted for Coastal Oil & Gas Ltd and UK Methane Ltd on the sale of methane gas exploration rights. Craig Griffiths advises West Sussex County Council on state aid and procurement issues.

[back to top]

Wales: Real estate

Within Commercial property: Cardiff, Acuity Legal Limited is a third tier firm,

Jonathan Geen’s team at Acuity Legal Limited punches above its weight, attracting instructions on significant projects from developer clients across the UK. It continued to advise the Greenbank Partnership in relation to the Cardiff Waterfront development in 2013, and also advised in relation to the Eco2 renewable energy plant in Brigg. Recently promoted partner Gareth Baker led on significant deals for Rightacres Property Co.

[back to top]

Within Construction, Acuity Legal Limited is a second tier firm,

At Acuity Legal Limited, Lyndon Richards led on construction advice relating Battersea Place in London, and the purpose-built campus at Cardiff and Vale College.

[back to top]

Within Planning and environment, Acuity Legal Limited is a third tier firm,

Stephen Morris at Acuity Legal Limited is recommended for property development matters.

[back to top]

Within Property litigation, tier 5

Lyndon Richards is recommended at Acuity Legal Limited.

[back to top]

Wales: TMT (technology, media and telecoms)

Within Intellectual property, Acuity Legal Limited is a second tier firm,

Rachelle Sellek and Christian Farrow at Acuity Legal Limited attract work from new and longstanding entrepreneurial clients; names include myPinPad, Do-IT Solutions, and G24i Power.

[back to top]

Within IT and telecoms, Acuity Legal Limited is a third tier firm,

Transactional lawyer Rachelle Sellek at Acuity Legal Limited advises technology businesses such as AIM-listed IQE plc. Christian Farrow and Craig Griffiths are noted for commercial advice to technology firms.

[back to top]

Within Sport, Acuity Legal Limited is a third tier firm,

At Acuity Legal Limited, Christian Farrow’s team acts for the Welsh Rugby Players Association. The firm also attracts work for players through its associated agency, The Endgame Group.

[back to top]

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to

    How to build an investment fraud defence case that disproves prosecution allegations of dishonesty.

    With a town council now officially facing a fraud investigation, we examine what individuals in such a large body should do if they come under suspicion.
  • The risks of liberation

    The dangers that pension liberation and money laundering pose to those involved in pension funds and management.

    What has been achieved since the introduction of the Act that was intended to tackle bribery in business?

    Five banks being fined £3.6 billion in the US for manipulating forex is a stark reminder of the legal risks involved in currency trading. Here, Aziz Rahman of Rahman Ravelli examines how the brokers and the traders in forex can avoid legal problems.
  • Foreign Intercepts

  • Finding the 
right words

    In the recent case of Newbury v Sun Microsystems [2013], the defendant argued that an offer to settle proceedings was ‘in principle' only and that a binding contract could not be formed until further terms had been agreed and a formal contract had been signed. It supported this argument by referring to a statement, in the offer letter, that the settlement was to be ‘recorded in a suitably worded agreement'. 

  • Behind the corporate veil: is that all there is?

    That companies have an existence entirely separate to that of their shareholders and directors is a foundational principle of English law and commerce.

  • Restoring environmental damage: putting a price on ecosystem services

    On 7 August 2009 a 40-inch pipeline ruptured, spilling 5,400 cubic metres of crude oil into the soil and groundwater of La Crau nature reserve in southern France, a habitat protected under French and European law. The operator had to excavate and replace 60,000 tons of soil, install 70 wells to pump and treat groundwater and 25 pumps to skim oil from surface water, at a cost in the region of €50m. However, this was just the primary remediation (that is, restoring the site to the state it would have been if the damage had not occurred). The operator was also required to compensate for the damage to the habitats and the loss of the ecosystem services that would otherwise have been provided by La Crau nature reserve. Measures included purchasing land outside of the nature reserve and contributing to its management for a period of 30 years (over €1m), monitoring the water table for 20 years (over €500,000), monitoring fauna over three years (€150,000) and rehabilitation in accordance with best available ecological techniques (nearly €2m). Overall, the compensatory restoration (to compensate for the amount of time that the ecosystem was impacted) and complimentary restoration (to compensate for elements of the ecosystem that had been permanently lost) came to more than €6.5m. 

  • The role of arbitrators in EU antitrust law

    In May 2014, it will be ten years since Regulation No 1/2003 entered into force. When the legislator of the European Union adopted this Regulation on 16 December 2002, its main objective was to decentralise the enforcement of the two main provisions of EU antitrust law, Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (now Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)). Where do the arbitrators fit in this picture?