The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

DLA Piper

NEVSKY PR 28 BLD A (ZINGER HOUSE), 191186 ST PETERSBURG, RUSSIA
Tel:
Work +7 812 448 7200
Fax:
Fax +7 812 448 7201
Email:
Web:
www.dlapiper.ru
DLA Piper, Ruslan Vasutin, St Petersburg, RUSSIA

Lawyer rankings

Ruslan Vasutin

Tel:
Work +7 812 448 7200
Email:
DLA Piper LLP (US)

Work Department

Tax

Position

Ruslan Vasutin is a partner and co-head of tax at DLA Piper in Russia. Ruslan advises on transaction structuring and the reorganization of companies; he possesses international expertise in the field of cross-border tax planning and inbound investments into Russia, participates in the regulation of tax disputes including on transfer pricing issues, and provides transactional tax support to both domestic and multinational clients. Ruslan has experience in assisting multinational companies with their transfer pricing strategies for Russia and supervises the preparation of transfer pricing defense documentation required to comply with new Russian transfer pricing rules.

Career

In 1995 ‚Äď 1999 Ruslan worked at Arthur Andersen, the international consulting company; from 1999 through 2002 at Andersen Legal, the legal department of Arthur Andersen. When Andersen and Ernst & Young combined their operations in Russia, he joined EY Law of Ernst & Young, as a Senior Manager. Ruslan has been a Partner at DLA Piper since 2005.

Languages

Russian, English

Education

St Petersburg State University, Degree in Law with honors (1995); St Petersburg State University of Economics and Finance, Degree in Accounting (1997); DLA Piper Strategic Leadership Programme, Harvard Business School, USA (2012)


Russia

Tax

Within: Tax

DLA Piper is ‚Äėa strong international firm‚Äô that provides ‚Äėexcellent advice and good value for money‚Äô. The team acts for a range of domestic and multinational companies, advising on the tax aspects of business operations, transactional activity and transfer pricing issues. Igor Venediktov and Ruslan Vasutin jointly head the group, which recently assisted Avestra Group with tax matters related to a restructuring project.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments by:
DLA Piper LLP (US)

  • Sentencing guidelines for corporate manslaughter

    In February 2010 the Sentencing Guidelines Council (the SGC) issued definitive guidelines to courts on imposing appropriate sentences for corporate manslaughter and health and safety offences causing death. The SGC states that fines imposed on companies found guilty of corporate manslaughter should not fall below £500,000, while fines in respect of health and safety offences that are a significant cause of death should be at least £100,000. Crucially, the SGC declined to provide for a fixed link between the imposed fine and the turnover or profitability of the offending company.‚Ä©
    - DLA Piper UK LLP

Legal Developments in Russia

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • The coming into force of the legislative package on the second stage of "Capital amnisty"

    On 19th February 2018, a legislative package on the extension of the tax capital amnesty and the tax-free liquidation of foreign companies came into force.
  • No More Linked In Russia?

    One of the biggest and most popular Internet companies, LinkedIn, has become the first target of the recent Russian data localization law. The legislation requires businesses operating online to keep Russian Internet users’ data on servers located within Russia. Read more...
  • New standards on the unjustified tax benefit included in the tax code

    The Federal Tax Service of Russia issued Letter ‚ĄĖ CA-4-7/ 6152 @ of 16.08.2017, in which it clarified to its subordinate tax authorities the application of new Art. 54.1 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation "Limits on the Exercise of Rights in Calculating the Tax Base and (or) the Amount of Tax, Levy, Insurance Contributions", which was included in the Tax Code of the Russian Federation by Federal Law ‚ĄĖ 163-FZ of 18.07.2017.
  • Information law for company participants ‚Äď the search for a balance of interests

    At the present time, in various legal relationships there exists the acute problem of observing a balance of interests concerning the parties involved in these legal relationships, their legal rights, and their mutual economic needs. Judicial practice, when considering disputes between these kinds of parties, takes into consideration not only the formal requirements of legislation, but also the real economic and legal goals and interests of the participants.
  • What businessmen should know about legislative changes with major and interested transactions?

    It is well known that before making significant managerial decisions, the general director must obtain approval from the shareholders or the board of directors. Apart from that, if a director is personally interested in entering into a transaction, approval is also required to proceed with the transaction. In the absence of such an approval, the transaction can be challenged and, in certain circumstances, invalidated. In order to minimize such risks and to eliminate legal uncertainty for the parties to the transaction, the rules governing major transactions and interested transactions must be sufficiently clear. Previously, however, the application of these rules was associated with a large number of controversial legal issues, which were finally solved as a result of the legislative amendments, which will enter into force on January 1, 2017. According to the new amendments, the distinction between major and non-major transactions has been delineated more clearly, parties have been allowed more flexibility in relation to approving transactions, the burdensome obligation to obtain prior approval of interested transactions has been abrogated, and finally the procedure for challenging transactions in question has been made much more complex. Overall, the changes should have a positive influence on business, as they contribute to the establishment of firm legal certainty in this area of the law. 
  • A Lessee‚Äôs Dream: the Drastic Devaluation of the Russian Currency Has Triggered New Discussions of

    The rent for leases, especially those in downtown Moscow and other large cities, is often based on the foreign currency exchange rate, which has recently increased almost threefold. Many businesses have been taken aback by this consequence of the economic crisis. Some of them have been put on verge of bankruptcy because of the increased rent and were forced to seek remedies in courts.
  • Amendments to Part IV of the Russian Civil Code in 2015

    Author: Valentina Orlova, Head of Intellectual Property and Trademarks Practice, Pepeliaev Group
  • Parallel Import of Medicines: High Time or the Wrong Time?

    Authors: Sergey Klimenko, Head of Life Sciences Group; Yuri Yahin, Head of IP Group, Pepeliaev Group
  • A Look at Russia's Antimonopoly Legislation

    Elena Sokolovskaya, Head of Antimonopoly Regulation Group, Pepeliaev Group The main areas covered by Russian antimonopoly legislation are prohibition of the abuse of a dominant position, regulation of prohibited agreements, antimonopoly requirements for bidding, merger control, and prohibition of unfair competition. In recent years more attention has been paid to the development of Russian antimonopoly legislation. For this purpose, the State Duma of the Russian Federation (the lower chamber of Russia's parliament) is considering draft measures billed as the 'Fourth Antimonopoly Package'. This comprises amendments to Law No. 135-FZ 'On Protecting Competition' (the "Law on Competition") as well as to the Russian Administrative Code. The measures have already been passed in the first reading and are expected to make it onto the statute book before the end of 2015.
  • A NEW DEVELOPMENT IN CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR RESTRICTING COMPETITION

    Pepeliaev Group Advises of Amendments to Article 178 of the Russian Criminal Code to Decriminalise Certain Offences and Introduce a New Condition for being Released from Criminal Liability for Restricting Competition