The Legal 500

THRALE HOUSE, 44-46 SOUTHWARK STREET, LONDON, SE1 1UN, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 0844 745 4000
Fax:
Fax 0844 745 4001
Web:
www.banksidelaw.com

Bankside Law is a well-established and highly regarded practice specialising in professional disciplinary and regulatory work, fraud (crime), fraud (commercial and regulatory investigations), and serious and private crime.

The firm: Bankside Law is committed to providing its clients with the highest quality representation across a range of litigation services, and has handled a number of long-running and extremely high-profile cases this year.

Types of work undertaken: Professional discipline and regulatory: the firm successfully combines acting for regulators in prosecuting disciplinary proceedings (ie architects and solicitors) with acting in defence of other professionals (predominantly health professionals, ie doctors, chiropractors and dentists). Its range of experience assists in providing specialist, all-round advice to its clients. Bankside Law was appointed to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) disciplinary proceedings panel in 2009 following a successful tender process, and continues to act for the ARB (Architects Registration Board) in misconduct and competence matters relating to architects. On the defence side, the firm is receiving increasing numbers of instructions from the MDU (Medical Defence Union) in defence of doctors in coroner’s hearings, GMC proceedings and internal disciplinary proceedings, as well as criminal investigations. It also continues to act for the UCA (United Chiropractic Association) in relation to regulatory matters and for individual chiropractors in disciplinary proceedings before the GCC. A continued focus on these established clients over the last 12 months has helped to reinforce the firm’s growing reputation and profile within the professional disciplinary and regulatory sector.

Fraud (crime): the firm has a significant presence in London and the UK within the area of serious fraud and is increasingly moving into new areas such as civil fraud and VAT tribunal work. The firm regularly represents clients in a wide variety of high-value and complex fraud cases, including Serious Fraud Office (SFO), Financial Services Authority (FSA), Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (HMRC) and Fraud Prosecution Service investigations, as well as money laundering cases, restraint orders, confiscation proceedings and cross-border fraud. Significant recent cases include several international corruption cases brought by the SFO involving sums of up to £50m; a high-profile case prosecuted by the Fraud Prosecution Service involving sums in excess of £112m, which involved Far Eastern companies banking through UK clearing banks in London; and a £19m ‘missing trader’ fraud. The firm also represented two clients in the recent SFO corruption probe involving BAE, one of the largest and most prominent investigations of its type in recent years. Other work includes a number of NHS fraud prosecutions against dentists; allegations of fraud against the former chief executive of a charity; and the first insider dealing case brought by BERR for four years. Currently, its lawyers are involved in a case of insider dealing investigated by the FSA involving workers at two major international banks; a case of infringement of intellectual copyright; and allegations of fraud (approx $88m) involving the manufacturer of bomb detector devices exported to Iraq and Afghanistan.

Fraud (commercial and regulatory investigations): this is an expanding and increasingly important area of the business. Most of the firm’s instructions involve substantial sums in excess of £4m, with two cases exceeding £20m in withheld funds. John Williams has also been involved in an investigation carried out by the Bank of England and in advising other professionals (accountants and solicitors) on their legal and ethical obligations in relation to their clients who are subject to investigation. Jonathan Goldring has acted for clients in civil cash forfeiture proceedings, defending both in the Magistrates’ Court and on appeal to the Crown Court. He recently successfully argued that the UKBA were required to prove a type of criminal activity in order to satisfy the test under the Proceeds of Crime Act. His argument found favour with the courts both at first instance and on appeal and was later approved in the case of Angus v UKBA [2011] EWHC 461 (Admin)

Serious and private crime: the firm’s experience covers a whole range of criminal cases, from motoring cases through to allegations of serious drug and sexual offences, crimes of violence (including murder), computer crime and terrorism. The firm also represents clients in defence of corporate manslaughter and HSE cases. Bankside Law is an active member of the LSC’s VHCC panel. Much of the work the firm does in this area is confidential and highly sensitive, but significant work over the past year includes a case of attempted murder; computer crime; numerous cases of drugs and sexual offences; an allegation of tax evasion involving the client of a nationwide firm of accountants; and a case of infringement of intellectual copyright within the music industry.

Breakdown of work %
Fraud/corporate crime 40
Regulatory 60

Number of UK partners 3

Above material supplied by Bankside Law.

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • HOUSING

    In Nzinga Maswaku v Westminster City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 669 the Court of Appeal clarified that in offering a homeless person with alternative temporary accommodation the local authority is obliged to point that if the offer is refused it has discharged its Part VII duties under the Housing Act 1996.
    - 11KBW
  • COUNCIL TAX

    In Harrow LBC v Ayiku [2012] EWHC 1200 (Admin) Sales J held that the word “or” in the Council Tax (Exempt Dwellings) Order 1992, art 3 Class N, had a disjunctive meaning, therefore it was sufficient for the non-British spouse of a foreign student to satisfy one or other of the two conditions, namely being prevented from taking paid employment or being prevented from claiming benefits, in order to qualify as a “relevant person” who was exempted from liability to pay council tax.
    - 11KBW
  • QUEEN’S SPEECH

    Bills already introduced pursuant to the Queen’s Speech on 9 May 2012 include Local Government Finance Bill and Electoral Registration and Administration Bill, both accompanied by Explanatory Notes, which in each case address ECHR compatibility.
    - 11KBW
  • Standards

    In R (Calver) v Adjudication Panel for Wales [2012] EWHC 1172 (Admin) Mr Calver was a member of Manorbier Community Council who successfully challenged the decision of the Panel to dismiss his appeal against a decision by Prembrokeshire County Council Standards Committee censuring him for a number of comments or blogs posted by him on a website he owned and controlled.
    - 11KBW
  • A justified retrospective

    Clive Sheldon - QC debates the pros & cons of retrospective tax legislation
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty (“PSED”)

    In R (Greenwich Community Law Centre) v Greenwich LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 496 the Court of Appeal held that the Council had had “due regard to the PSED when making changes to its funding of community legal advice services”. At para 30 Elias LJ said:
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty

    Surrey County Council conducted a review of its Library Service. This culminated in a Report to the Council’s Cabinet. The Recommendations in the Report included that there should be consultation about a community-partnership approach at selected Libraries.
    - 11KBW
  • Judicial Review

    The Judgment of Lindblom J in The Manydown Co Ltd v Basingstoke and Deane BC [2012] EWHC 977 (Admin) repays attention. The Claimant sought to challenge by judicial review 2 decisions of the Council: (1) the Council’s refusal to reconsider its position on the development of a site that it owns (and is the subject matter of a Joint Development Partnership Agreement with the Claimant); and (2) a decision of the Council’s Cabinet approving a selection of sites for development which did not include this site.
    - 11KBW
  • The Health and Social Care Act 2012: impact on adult social services

    After its torrid passage through Parliament, the Health and Social Care Bill received Royal Assent on 27 March 2012. The Act deals principally with healthcare reform, but it also contains some amendments to the legislative framework for social care. It will come into force on a day yet to be appointed by the Secretary of State.
    - 11KBW
  • Immigration update May 2012

    In this issue: