The Legal 500

CMS Cameron McKenna LLP

MITRE HOUSE, 160 ALDERSGATE STREET, LONDON, EC1A 4DD, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7367 3000
Fax:
Fax 020 7367 2000
DX:
135316 BARBICAN 2
Web:
www.cms-cmck.com
Email:

Andrew Symons

Tel:
Work +44 20 7367 3044
Email:
CMS Cameron McKenna LLP

Work Department

Insurance and reinsurance group.

Position

Partner specialising in a broad variety of insurance and reinsurance dispute resolution work including arbitration, coverage and avoidance issues as well as policy drafting and interpretation. Areas of specialisation include claims involving banks/financial institutions and all classes of non-marine, ?marine and aviation reinsurance. Recent cases include acting for the successful parties in the Kuwait test case (Scott v Copenhagen Re) concerning the aggregation issues arising out of the invasion of Kuwait, acting for the successful parties in the House of Lords decision in Aneco v J&H, as well as other major market reinsurance disputes such as the reinsurance claims arising out of the $780m settlement out of the grounding of the Exxon Valdez (King v Brandywine Re) and coverage/aggregation issues arising out of ?WTC. Also represented Swiss Re, GE, Chubb and other insurers ?in the £500m Central Fund dispute against Lloyds of ?London.

Career

Qualified 1991; partner CMS Cameron McKenna 2001.

Education

King’s College London.

Practice Areas

Litigation - insurance/reinsurance

Back to index

Legal Developments by:
CMS Cameron McKenna LLP

  • Access to justice: protective costs orders in planning challenges

    Third parties and competing developers have no rights of appeal to the Secretary of State against planning decisions. Disappointed applicants can appeal to the Secretary of State and can have the merits of the application reconsidered. The only remedy available to a disappointed third party is a challenge by way of judicial review in the High Court on a point of law. The sense of frustration and disempowerment this creates has not been helped by the increasing complexity of the planning process and the use of consultation to legitimise decisions that many perceive may already have been taken.
    - CMS Group

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to