The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

CMS

VIA A. DEPRETIS, 86, 00184 ROME, ITALY
Tel:
Work +39 06 47 81 51
Fax:
Fax +39 06 48 37 55
Email:
Web:
www.cms.law
Aberdeen, Algiers, Amsterdam, Antwerp, Barcelona, Beijing and 70 more

Domenico Gaudiello

Tel:
Work +39 06 478151
Email:
CMS

Work Department

Banking & Finance, Public Finance

Position

Partner

Career

Domenico Gaudiello is a Partner responsible for the Public Finance department within the Banking and Finance Group.

He joined the firm in 2017, after 8 years as equity partner in a primary international law firm.  He assists banks and public authorities in connection with derivatives transactions, the issuing of public and sovereign debts, and compliance with the Eurostat regulations.
He is highly recommended for financial litigation and derivatives litigation involving public authorities and financial intermediaries in connection with misselling disputes, duties of care and other related MiFID topics.

Languages

Italian, English, German

Member

- Admitted to defend clients before the Supreme Court of Cassation
- Naples Bar Association


Italy: Banking and finance

Bank regulatory

Within: Bank regulatory

CMS regularly advises Commerzbank on regulatory issues pertaining to its banking activities in Italy. Paolo Bonolishas a thorough knowledge of the legal environment’ and Domenico Gaudiello joined from DLA Piper.

[back to top]

Borrower side

Within: Borrower side

CMS hired Domenico Gaudiello as public finance leader from DLA Piper. Banking and financial law head Paolo Bonolis is recommended for complex financing transactions.

[back to top]

Lender or arranger side

Within: Lender or arranger side

CMS acts in complex banking matters and structured finance, as well as deals involving alternative lenders. Paolo Bonolis heads the banking and financial practice, which recently welcomed Domenico Gaudiello as public finance leader from DLA Piper.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments by:
CMS

  • Access to justice: protective costs orders in planning challenges

    Third parties and competing developers have no rights of appeal to the Secretary of State against planning decisions. Disappointed applicants can appeal to the Secretary of State and can have the merits of the application reconsidered. The only remedy available to a disappointed third party is a challenge by way of judicial review in the High Court on a point of law. The sense of frustration and disempowerment this creates has not been helped by the increasing complexity of the planning process and the use of consultation to legitimise decisions that many perceive may already have been taken.
    - CMS Group

Legal Developments in Italy

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to