The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

CMS

RUA SOUSA MARTINS, 10, 1050-218 LISBON, PORTUGAL
Tel:
Work +351 21 095 81 00
Fax:
Fax +351 210 958 155
Email:
Web:
www.cms.law
Aberdeen, Algiers, Amsterdam, Antwerp, Barcelona, Beijing and 68 more

Nuno Pena

Tel:
Work +351210958100
Email:
CMS

Work Department

Dispute Resolution / Restructuring & Insolvency

Position

Nuno Pena has been developing his professional activity with particular emphasis on the areas of Civil, Commercial, Corporate Litigation and Restucturing and Insolvency. Nuno Pena is a founding partner of CMS Rui Pena & Arnaut

Languages

Portuguese, English, Spanish

Education

Nuno Pena is graduated in law from the Law Faculty of the Catholic University Portugal with a Post-graduation degree in Management and Taxation from the Advanced Financial and Tax Studies Institute.


Portugal

Dispute resolution

Within: Dispute resolution

In a major coup, CMS added Miguel Esperança Pina and Rita Gouveia from Cuatrecasas to the team. The outfit maintains a varied litigation and arbitration practice, and in one highlight represented Armscor in a claim for fees brought by a British and Panamanian company relating to the setting up of a channel to acquire, assemble and transport helicopters to South Africa. Highly regarded Joaquim Shearman de Macedo led on the matter jointly with the recommended Nuno Pena.

[back to top]

Insolvency and restructuring

Within: Insolvency and restructuring

CMSNuno Pena is assisting Caixa Económica Montepio Geral as majority creditor in the recovery of Espírito Santo Hotéis, which is owned by Rio Forte. The ‘well-connected’ Joaquim Shearman de Macedo is a ‘solid lawyer with good commercial judgement and creative thinking’. He is representing Chamartín Group in negotiations with banks as part of its recovery and insolvency restructuring. Miguel Esperança Pina and Rita Gouveia joined from Cuatrecasas in November 2018.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments by:
CMS

  • Access to justice: protective costs orders in planning challenges

    Third parties and competing developers have no rights of appeal to the Secretary of State against planning decisions. Disappointed applicants can appeal to the Secretary of State and can have the merits of the application reconsidered. The only remedy available to a disappointed third party is a challenge by way of judicial review in the High Court on a point of law. The sense of frustration and disempowerment this creates has not been helped by the increasing complexity of the planning process and the use of consultation to legitimise decisions that many perceive may already have been taken.
    - CMS Group

Legal Developments in Portugal

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to