The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Petrikic & Partneri AOD in cooperation with CMS Reich-Rohrwig Hainz

CINCAR JANKOVA 3, 11000 BELGRADE, SERBIA
Tel:
Work +381 11 32 08 900
Fax:
Fax +381 11 3208 930
Email:
Web:
www.cms-rrh.com
Aberdeen, Algiers, Amsterdam, Antwerp, Barcelona, Beijing and 68 more

Maja Stepanovic

Tel:
Work +381 11 3208900
Email:
CMS

Work Department

Corporate , Commercial, M&A

Position

Local Partner and an expert in the field of corporate and commercial law, privatisations, M&A, and civil law, she has gained outstanding work experience advising international clients on different legal matters in Serbia. In addition to providing legal support to a great number of international corporations, Maja has also advised the Privatization Agency of the Republic of Serbia in different privatisation transactions, as well as international buyers in the course of acquisition of Serbian companies in the privatisation process. She is also a registered IP agent.

Career

with CMS since 2002

Languages

Serbian, English

Member

Serbian Bar Association (1999)

Education

Degree of Faculty of Law of the University of Belgrade


Serbia

Commercial, corporate and M&A

Within: Commercial, corporate and M&A

Petrikic & Partneri AOD in cooperation with CMS Reich-Rohrwig Hainz is advising Nikola Tesla Airport on the options available for sourcing development funds. It is also assisting Lear Corporation, a Fortune 500 company, with a greenfield investment, which includes constructing a Serbian manufacturing plant. Vienna-based Radivoje Petrikić leads the Belgrade office. Marija Tešić and Maja Stepanović are other names to note.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments by:
CMS

  • Access to justice: protective costs orders in planning challenges

    Third parties and competing developers have no rights of appeal to the Secretary of State against planning decisions. Disappointed applicants can appeal to the Secretary of State and can have the merits of the application reconsidered. The only remedy available to a disappointed third party is a challenge by way of judicial review in the High Court on a point of law. The sense of frustration and disempowerment this creates has not been helped by the increasing complexity of the planning process and the use of consultation to legitimise decisions that many perceive may already have been taken.
    - CMS Group

Legal Developments in Serbia

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to