The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

CMS Albiñana y Suárez de Lezo

PASEO DE RECOLETOS, 7-9, 28004 MADRID, SPAIN
Tel:
Work +34 91 451 93 00
Fax:
Fax +34 91 442 60 45
Email:
Web:
www.cms-asl.com
Aberdeen, Algiers, Amsterdam, Antwerp, Barcelona, Beijing and 70 more

Lawyer rankings

Diego de Miguel

Tel:
Work +34 91 451 93 00
Email:
Web:
cms.law
CMS

Work Department

Tax

Position

Partner

Career

Possesses vast experience in providing ongoing tax advice, as well as assistance to family-run firms. Moreover, he has been involved in numerous international taxation projects, advised real estate enterprises and designed and implemented investment structures and corporate restructuring.
He is also experienced in defending taxpayer interests in relation to their standing with the Tax Authority and in the preparation and execution of all types of administrative and contentious-administrative tax proceedings.

Languages

Spanish and English

Member

Madrid Bar Association

Education

2005 - Master's Degree in Taxation, Centre of Financial Studies (Spain)
2004 - Degree in Business Management, Universidad Pontificia Comillas ICADE (Spain).


Spain

Tax

Within: Tax

Recommended for its ‘availability, dedication, knowledge and trust’, CMS Albiñana y Suárez de Lezo advises Spanish and foreign multinationals on a range of direct and indirect taxation issues. The ‘well-prepared’ team is ‘particularly strong in the key area of tax litigation’. Leading the practice is the ‘outstandingDiego de Miguel, who has ‘a solid knowledge of the entire tax system, expertise in tax litigation and quickly identifies important points’. The firm is advising Acciona on tax matters arising from the sale of its shipping company, and is assisting Savills with the tax implications of its acquisition of Aguirre Newman, in order to form a market leading real estate consultancy.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments by:
CMS

  • Access to justice: protective costs orders in planning challenges

    Third parties and competing developers have no rights of appeal to the Secretary of State against planning decisions. Disappointed applicants can appeal to the Secretary of State and can have the merits of the application reconsidered. The only remedy available to a disappointed third party is a challenge by way of judicial review in the High Court on a point of law. The sense of frustration and disempowerment this creates has not been helped by the increasing complexity of the planning process and the use of consultation to legitimise decisions that many perceive may already have been taken.
    - CMS Group

Legal Developments in Spain

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to