The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

CMS

ROOM 1909, CHINA YOUTH PLAZA NO. 19 DONGSANHUAN NORTH ROAD, CHAOYANG DISTRICT, BEIJING 100026, CHINA
Tel:
Work +86 10 8527 0259
Fax:
Fax +86 10 8590 0831
Email:
Web:
cms.law
Aberdeen, Algiers, Amsterdam, Antwerp, Barcelona, Beijing and 70 more

China: Corporate and M&A

Foreign firms
Corporate and M&A: foreign firms - ranked: tier 4

CMS

At CMS, ‘the service is very good, timely and pragmatic, and shows good understanding of clients’ business needs’. The team is well known for cross-border M&A transactions across a diverse range of industries. Managing partner of the Shanghai Office Ulrike Glueck is a key contact.

[back to top]

China: Dispute resolution

Foreign firms
Dispute resolution: foreign firms - ranked: tier 5

CMS

CMS has considerable experience in commercial disputes in the pharmaceutical, technology, energy and logistics sectors. Beijing managing partner Nick Beckett is ‘one of the most dynamic, responsive and generous lawyers around, and has an unparalleled ability to bring international teams together to deliver the precise expertise that clients require’. Falk Lichtenstein is also highly regarded, as is Ulrike Glueck, an arbitrator on the Shanghai Arbitration Commission and Shanghai International Arbitration Centre panels.

[back to top]

China: Healthcare and life sciences

Foreign firms
Healthcare and life sciences: foreign firms - ranked: tier 1

CMS

A ‘global powerhouse with deep expertise in the healthcare and life sciences sector’, CMS earns a top position thanks to its genuine dedication to the field. Delivering ‘strong knowledge of the applicable law’, ‘significant practical experience’ and a ‘consistently thorough approach’, the group comprises scientists, academics and senior and junior lawyers specialising in corporate, commercial, IP, regulatory and competition law. Clients include major international players in the industry, including Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Smith & Nephew and Allergan. The team has also built relationships with domestic Chinese companies in the pharmaceutical field. ‘Dynamic’ practice head Nick Beckett ‘has an unparalleled ability to bring international teams together to deliver the precise expertise that his clients require’. He jointly leads the global life sciences sector group alongside Jens Wagner in Germany. Nicolas Zhu is also recommended for his advice to life sciences companies on a range of corporate and IP issues.

[back to top]

China: Intellectual property

Foreign firms
Intellectual property: foreign firms - ranked: tier 3

CMS

CMS stands out for its strong life sciences practice, where leading multinationals turn to the team for a variety of matters, including contentious and non-contentious IP. Other clients span the TMT, retail and food and beverage sectors. Practice head Nick Beckett and Ulrike Glueck are names to note.

[back to top]

China: Projects and energy

Foreign firms
Other recommended firms - ranked: tier 1

CMS

[back to top]

China: TMT

Foreign firms
TMT: foreign firms - ranked: tier 3

CMS

The ‘very professional’ team at CMS provides ‘realistic solutions’. Ulrike Glueck heads the TMT group, which comprises lawyers with IP and corporate and commercial backgrounds. Its client base includes domestic and foreign companies, particularly those with European roots, where the team’s English, French and German language skills are an important asset. Nick Beckett recently advised a multinational client on cross-border e-commerce matters. Falk Lichtenstein is also recommended.

[back to top]

China: Tax

Foreign firms
Tax: foreign firms - ranked: tier 4

CMS

At CMS, senior associate Gilbert Shen heads the tax practice, working closely with partners Nicolas Zhu, whose practice takes in tax, corporate and commercial law and intellectual property, and Ulrike Glueck, who oversees many of the department’s corporate transactions.

[back to top]


Further information on CMS

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about CMS in other jurisdictions.

United Arab Emirates

Offices in Dubai and Dubai

Albania

Offices in Tirana

Angola

Austria

Offices in Vienna

Belgium

Offices in Brussels, Antwerp, Brussels, Brussels, and Brussels

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Offices in Sarajevo

Bulgaria

Offices in Sofia and Sofia

China

Offices in Beijing, Beijing, and Shanghai

Croatia

Offices in Zagreb

Czech Republic

Offices in Prague

Germany

Offices in Hamburg, Frankfurt, Stuttgart, Berlin, Leipzig, Dusseldorf, Cologne, Munich, and Munich

Algeria

Offices in Algiers

Spain

Offices in Madrid, Malaga, Seville, Madrid, and Barcelona

France

Offices in Paris, Strasbourg, and Lyon

Hong Kong

Offices in Hong Kong and Hong Kong

Hungary

Offices in Budapest

Latin America: International firms

Italy

Offices in Rome and Milan

Lebanon

Offices in Beirut

London

Offices in London EC4N and London EC3A

Luxembourg

Offices in Luxembourg

Morocco

Offices in Casablanca

Montenegro

Offices in Podgorica

Netherlands

Offices in Utrecht and Amsterdam

North West

Offices in Manchester

Oman

Offices in Muscat

Poland

Offices in Warsaw and Poznan

Portugal

Offices in Lisbon

Romania

Offices in Bucharest

Russia

Offices in Moscow

Scotland

Offices in Edinburgh, Glasgow, and Aberdeen

South East

Offices in Reading

Singapore

Offices in Singapore, Singapore, and Singapore

Slovenia

Offices in Ljubljana

South West

Offices in Bristol

Switzerland

Offices in Zurich and Geneva

Ukraine

Offices in Kiev and Kiev

Yorkshire and the Humber

Offices in Sheffield S2 and Sheffield S2

Serbia

Offices in Belgrade

Legal Developments by:
CMS

  • Access to justice: protective costs orders in planning challenges

    Third parties and competing developers have no rights of appeal to the Secretary of State against planning decisions. Disappointed applicants can appeal to the Secretary of State and can have the merits of the application reconsidered. The only remedy available to a disappointed third party is a challenge by way of judicial review in the High Court on a point of law. The sense of frustration and disempowerment this creates has not been helped by the increasing complexity of the planning process and the use of consultation to legitimise decisions that many perceive may already have been taken.
    - CMS Group

Legal Developments in China

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to