The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang Po┼Ťniak i Sawicki sp.k.

Offices

Other ranked firms

The following firms have provided more information to help you choose the right firm.


Poland

Banking and finance

Domanski Zakrzewski Palinka

Soltysinski Kawecki & Szlezak

Gide Loyrette Nouel

Kochanski & Partners

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

WKB Wiercinski, Kwiecinski, Baehr

DLA Piper

Capital markets

Prof. Marek Wierzbowski and Partners Advocates and Legal Counsellors

Hogan Lovells (Warszawa) LLP

Norton Rose Fulbright

WKB Wiercinski, Kwiecinski, Baehr

act BSWW

Commercial, corporate and M&A

Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland

Soltysinski Kawecki & Szlezak

Domanski Zakrzewski Palinka

Gide Loyrette Nouel

Noerr

Norton Rose Fulbright

Competition/antitrust

White & Case M. Studniarek i Wsp├│lnicy - Kancelaria Prawna sp.k.

Hogan Lovells (Warszawa) LLP

Construction

WKB Wiercinski, Kwiecinski, Baehr

act BSWW

Domanski Zakrzewski Palinka

DLA Piper

Dispute resolution

Greenberg Traurig Grzesiak sp. k.

R├ÂHRENSCHEF

Laszczuk i Wsp├│lnicy sp.k.

Employment

Dentons

DLA Piper

Domanski Zakrzewski Palinka

Energy and natural resources

Squire Patton Boggs Swiecicki Krzesniak sp. k.

Clifford Chance

Baker & McKenzie Krzyżowski i Wspólnicy Spółka Komandytowa

WKB Wiercinski, Kwiecinski, Baehr

Insurance

Budzowska, Fiutowski & Partnerzy - Radcowie Prawni

Baker & McKenzie Krzyżowski i Wspólnicy Spółka Komandytowa

Intellectual property

DLA Piper

Lesnodorski, Slusarek & Partners

Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland

Czyzewscy Kancelaria Adwokacka

Kochanski & Partners

Domanski Zakrzewski Palinka

Investment funds

Crido Legal

Private equity

Baker & McKenzie Krzyżowski i Wspólnicy Spółka Komandytowa

Norton Rose Fulbright

Dentons

Public law

Wierzbowski Eversheds Sutherland

Olesinski & Wspolnicy

Real estate

Baker & McKenzie Krzyżowski i Wspólnicy Spółka Komandytowa

Gide Loyrette Nouel

Clifford Chance

DLA Piper

Restructuring and insolvency

WKB Wiercinski, Kwiecinski, Baehr

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

Greenberg Traurig Grzesiak sp. k.

TMT

Traple Konarski Podrecki & Partners

Tax

Radzikowski, Szubielska i Wsp├│lnicy sp.k.

Domanski Zakrzewski Palinka

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

Hogan Lovells (Warszawa) LLP

White-collar crime

Kondracki Celej Adwokaci sp.p.

Noerr

Laszczuk i Wsp├│lnicy sp.k.

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

Hogan Lovells (Warszawa) LLP

Domanski Zakrzewski Palinka

act BSWW

DLA Piper

Dentons

Soltysinski Kawecki & Szlezak


Legal Developments by:
CMS

  • Access to justice: protective costs orders in planning challenges

    Third parties and competing developers have no rights of appeal to the Secretary of State against planning decisions. Disappointed applicants can appeal to the Secretary of State and can have the merits of the application reconsidered. The only remedy available to a disappointed third party is a challenge by way of judicial review in the High Court on a point of law. The sense of frustration and disempowerment this creates has not been helped by the increasing complexity of the planning process and the use of consultation to legitimise decisions that many perceive may already have been taken.
    - CMS Group

Legal Developments in Poland

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to