The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

CMS

19B INSTYTUTSKA ST., 01021 KIEV, UKRAINE
Tel:
Work +380 44 500 1718
Fax:
Fax +380 44 500 1716
Web:
cms.law
Aberdeen, Algiers, Amsterdam, Antwerp, Barcelona, Beijing and 70 more

Ukraine

Banking, finance and capital markets
Banking, finance and capital markets - ranked: tier 1

CMS

At CMS, Anna Pogrebna is the lead finance partner and Kateryna Chechulina is a rising star senior associate. The firm's diverse range of work includes major financings in the agriculture, metals, infrastructure, aviation, and natural resources sectors. ING Bank and EBRD are among its clients.

Leading individuals
Next Generation Partners

Kateryna Chechulina - CMS

[back to top]

Commercial, corporate and M&A
Commercial, corporate and M&A - ranked: tier 1

CMS

CMS is widely regarded as a leading firm for cross-border M&A deals. Highly regarded duo Graham Conlon and Maria Orlyk and counsel Tetyana Dovgan are key practitioners. Clients include HNA Group and Scatec Solar. For SD Capital, the firm handled a joint venture with P&O Maritime.

Leading individuals

Maria Orlyk - CMS

Next Generation Partners

Tetyana Dovgan - CMS

[back to top]

Competition
Competition - ranked: tier 1

CMS

'Often seen on high-end assignments and complex transactions', CMS has experienced competition lawyers in Maria Orlyk and Olga Belyakova. For SD Capital, the firm successfully obtained merger clearance for a joint venture with port operator P&O Maritime.

Leading individuals

Maria Orlyk - CMS

[back to top]

Dispute resolution
Dispute resolution - ranked: tier 2

CMS

Commercial arbitration, investment arbitration, cross-border litigation and energy disputes are key areas of focus for CMS, where Olexander Martinenko, Anna Pogrebna and Maria Orlyk are among the key partners. Vitaliy Radchenko handled the enforcement of an arbitral award for JKX Oil & Gas.

Leading individuals

[back to top]

Employment
Employment - ranked: tier 1

CMS

CMS handles advisory work, redundancies, internal policies, outsourcing, restructuring, labour disputes and immigration matters. Olga Belyakova and practice head Maria Orlyk are the main contacts. Senior associate Nataliya Nakonechna is also noted. The team advised Scatec Solar on the employment aspects of a corporate acquisition.

Next Generation Partners

Nataliya Nakonechna - CMS

[back to top]

Energy
Energy - ranked: tier 1

CMS

CMS is 'still the market leader', according to one client. Practice heads Vitaliy Radchenko and Johannes Trenkwalder count Scatec Solar and McKinsey among their clients. Senior associate Volodymyr Kolvakh is also noted.

Leading individuals
Next Generation Partners

Volodymyr Kolvakh - CMS

[back to top]

Intellectual property
Intellectual property - ranked: tier 2

CMS

CMS handles domestic and cross-border IP matters including litigation and rights management. Commercial partner Olexander Martinenko and practice head Maria Orlyk are the key contacts. Olga Belyakova advised a US social media company on the transfer of IP rights.

[back to top]

Real estate and construction
Real estate and construction - ranked: tier 1

CMS

CMS has a broad practice encompassing construction, planning, leasing, financing and transactional work. Anna Pogrebna, who advised German property group Conwert on the sale of its Ukrainian assets, and Natalia Kushniruk lead the practice.

Leading individuals

[back to top]

Tax
Tax - ranked: tier 2

CMS

CMS stands out for the strength of its tax and customs advisory work and its track record in litigation. Regulatory specialist Olexander Martinenko and practice head Anna Pogrebna, who count Scatec Solar among their clients, are recommended.

[back to top]

White-collar crime
White-collar crime - ranked: tier 2

CMS

Senior partner Olexander Martinenko leads the commercial, regulatory and disputes group at CMS. He recently acted for a major multinational oil and gas company in an investigation of its Ukrainian subsidiary. Maria Orlyk and senior associate Olga Shenk are also recommended.

Leading individuals

[back to top]


Further information on CMS

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about CMS in other jurisdictions.

United Arab Emirates

Offices in Dubai

Albania

Offices in Tirana

Angola

Austria

Offices in Vienna

Belgium

Offices in Brussels, Antwerp, and Brussels

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Offices in Sarajevo

Bulgaria

Offices in Sofia and Sofia

China

Offices in Beijing, Beijing, and Shanghai

Croatia

Offices in Zagreb

Czech Republic

Offices in Prague

Germany

Offices in Hamburg, Frankfurt, Stuttgart, Berlin, Leipzig, Dusseldorf, Cologne, and Munich

Algeria

Offices in Algiers

Spain

Offices in Madrid, Malaga, Seville, Madrid, and Barcelona

France

Offices in Paris, Strasbourg, and Lyon

Hong Kong

Offices in Hong Kong and Hong Kong

Hungary

Offices in Budapest

Latin America: International firms

Italy

Offices in Rome and Milan

Kenya

Offices in Mombasa and Nairobi

Lebanon

Offices in Beirut

London

Offices in London EC4N and London EC3A

Luxembourg

Offices in Luxembourg

North Macedonia

Offices in Skopje

Morocco

Offices in Casablanca

Montenegro

Offices in Podgorica

Netherlands

Offices in Utrecht and Amsterdam

North West

Offices in Manchester

Oman

Offices in Muscat

Poland

Offices in Warsaw and Poznan

Portugal

Offices in Lisbon

Romania

Offices in Bucharest

Russia

Offices in Moscow

Scotland

Offices in Edinburgh, Glasgow, and Aberdeen

South East

Offices in Reading

Singapore

Offices in Singapore, Singapore, and Singapore

Slovakia

Offices in Bratislava

Slovenia

Offices in Ljubljana

South West

Offices in Bristol

Switzerland

Offices in Zurich, Geneva, and Geneva

Turkey

Offices in Istanbul and Elmadańü/ŇěiŇüli

Ukraine

Offices in Kiev and Kiev

Yorkshire and the Humber

Offices in Sheffield S2 and Sheffield S2

Serbia

Offices in Belgrade

Legal Developments by:
CMS

  • Access to justice: protective costs orders in planning challenges

    Third parties and competing developers have no rights of appeal to the Secretary of State against planning decisions. Disappointed applicants can appeal to the Secretary of State and can have the merits of the application reconsidered. The only remedy available to a disappointed third party is a challenge by way of judicial review in the High Court on a point of law. The sense of frustration and disempowerment this creates has not been helped by the increasing complexity of the planning process and the use of consultation to legitimise decisions that many perceive may already have been taken.
    - CMS Group

Legal Developments in Ukraine

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to