The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

CMS

Offices

Other ranked firms

The following firms have provided more information to help you choose the right firm.


Russia

Banking and finance: Borrower side

Baker & McKenzie - CIS, Limited

Debevoise & Plimpton LLP

Dechert Russia LLC

King & Spalding LLP

White & Case LLC

LP Law Firm

Noerr

Ivanyan & Partners

Banking and finance: Lender or arranger side

Pepeliaev Group

King & Spalding LLP

Dechert Russia LLC

KIAP (Korelskiy, Ischuk, Astafiev and Partners, Attorneys at Law)

LP Law Firm

Noerr

Commercial, corporate and M&a: Moscow

Infralex

VEGAS LEX

Ivanyan & Partners

LP Law Firm

Noerr

Andrey Gorodissky & Partners

King & Spalding LLP

Monastyrsky, Zyuba, Stepanov & Partners

Competition

Noerr

Muranov, Chernyakov & Partners

Infralex

ART DE LEX Law Firm

DLA Piper Rus Limited

Dispute resolution: Litigation

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

Noerr

LP Law Firm

Lidings

Rustam Kurmaev & Partners

Infralex

Ivanyan & Partners

Employment

Debevoise & Plimpton LLP

Dechert Russia LLC

FBK Legal

Eversheds Sutherland

Squire Patton Boggs

Five Stones Consulting

Energy and natural resources

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Russia) LLP

DLA Piper Rus Limited

Dechert Russia LLC

Clifford Chance

Baker & McKenzie - CIS, Limited

Intellectual property

Patent & Law Firm Yus

Pepeliaev Group

Gowling WLG

Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners

Gorodissky & Partners

KIAP (Korelskiy, Ischuk, Astafiev and Partners, Attorneys at Law)

PPP and infrastructure projects

FBK Legal

Clifford Chance

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Russia) LLP

ALRUD Law Firm

Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners

Infralex

Real estate and construction

Hogan Lovells (CIS)

Ivanyan & Partners

Sirota & Partners

Debevoise & Plimpton LLP

Borenius

Capital Legal Services

TMT

Clifford Chance

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Pepeliaev Group

Noerr

LP Law Firm

DLA Piper Rus Limited

Tax

BGP Litigation

Deloitte Legal


Legal Developments by:
CMS

  • Access to justice: protective costs orders in planning challenges

    Third parties and competing developers have no rights of appeal to the Secretary of State against planning decisions. Disappointed applicants can appeal to the Secretary of State and can have the merits of the application reconsidered. The only remedy available to a disappointed third party is a challenge by way of judicial review in the High Court on a point of law. The sense of frustration and disempowerment this creates has not been helped by the increasing complexity of the planning process and the use of consultation to legitimise decisions that many perceive may already have been taken.
    - CMS Group

Legal Developments in Russia

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to