The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

CMS

Offices

Other ranked firms

The following firms have provided more information to help you choose the right firm.


Russia

Competition

DLA Piper

Infralex

Noerr

ART DE LEX Law Firm

Employment

Andrey Gorodissky & Partners

DLA Piper

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Russia) LLP

Pepeliaev Group

ALRUD Law Firm

Energy and natural resources

DLA Piper

Dentons

ALRUD Law Firm

Baker & McKenzie - CIS, Limited

Intellectual property

Gowling WLG

Gorodissky & Partners

Pepeliaev Group

Ermakova, Stoliarova & Partners, Patent Agency

Patent & Law Firm Yus

KIAP (Korelskiy, Ischuk, Astafiev and Partners, Attorneys at Law)

PPP and infrastructure projects

Capital Legal Services

Clifford Chance

Real estate and construction

Sirota & Partners

Capital Legal Services

Lidings

Borenius

Ivanyan & Partners

Hogan Lovells (CIS)

TMT

Liniya Prava Law Firm

DLA Piper

Clifford Chance

MGAP Attorneys at Law

King & Spalding LLP

Pepeliaev Group

Baker & McKenzie - CIS, Limited

Tax

KPMG

Dentons

ALRUD Law Firm

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Russia) LLP

Sameta

TaxAdvisor


Legal Developments by:
CMS

  • Access to justice: protective costs orders in planning challenges

    Third parties and competing developers have no rights of appeal to the Secretary of State against planning decisions. Disappointed applicants can appeal to the Secretary of State and can have the merits of the application reconsidered. The only remedy available to a disappointed third party is a challenge by way of judicial review in the High Court on a point of law. The sense of frustration and disempowerment this creates has not been helped by the increasing complexity of the planning process and the use of consultation to legitimise decisions that many perceive may already have been taken.
    - CMS Group

Legal Developments in Russia

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to