The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

CMS

Offices

Other ranked firms

The following firms have provided more information to help you choose the right firm.


Hungary

Banking, finance and capital markets

Szecskay Attorneys at Law

Cerha Hempel

Gárdos Mosonyi Tomori Law Office

Wolf Theiss Faludi Erős Ügyvédi Iroda

Hegymegi-Barakonyi and Partner Baker & McKenzie Attorneys-at-Law

Schoenherr Hetényi Ügyvédi Iroda

Commercial, corporate and M&A

Wolf Theiss Faludi Erős Ügyvédi Iroda

Szecskay Attorneys at Law

Andrékó Kinstellar

Oppenheim Ugyvedi Iroda

VJT & Partners

Forgó, Damjanovic & Partners Law Firm

Competition

Cerha Hempel

Szecskay Attorneys at Law

Schoenherr Hetényi Ügyvédi Iroda

DLA Piper Hungary

Dispute resolution

Siegler Bird & Bird Ügyvédi Iroda

Wilkinson European Community Jurist Office/Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP

VJT & Partners

Forgó, Damjanovic & Partners Law Firm

Dentons

DLA Piper Hungary

Wolf Theiss Faludi Erős Ügyvédi Iroda

Hegymegi-Barakonyi and Partner Baker & McKenzie Attorneys-at-Law

Employment

Dentons

DLA Piper Hungary

KCG Partners Law Firm

Wolf Theiss Faludi Erős Ügyvédi Iroda

Szecskay Attorneys at Law

Andrékó Kinstellar

Intellectual property

Dentons

DLA Piper Hungary

Forgó, Damjanovic & Partners Law Firm

Projects and energy

Cerha Hempel

Oppenheim Ugyvedi Iroda

Hegymegi-Barakonyi and Partner Baker & McKenzie Attorneys-at-Law

Real estate and construction

Siegler Bird & Bird Ügyvédi Iroda

Hegymegi-Barakonyi and Partner Baker & McKenzie Attorneys-at-Law

DLA Piper Hungary

Oppenheim Ugyvedi Iroda

TMT

Siegler Bird & Bird Ügyvédi Iroda

DLA Piper Hungary

Dentons

VJT & Partners

Hegymegi-Barakonyi and Partner Baker & McKenzie Attorneys-at-Law

Tax

Wolf Theiss Faludi Erős Ügyvédi Iroda

Szecskay Attorneys at Law

bpv JÁDI NÉMETH Attorneys at Law

Deloitte Legal Erdos and Partners Law Firm

KCG Partners Law Firm


Legal Developments by:
CMS

  • Access to justice: protective costs orders in planning challenges

    Third parties and competing developers have no rights of appeal to the Secretary of State against planning decisions. Disappointed applicants can appeal to the Secretary of State and can have the merits of the application reconsidered. The only remedy available to a disappointed third party is a challenge by way of judicial review in the High Court on a point of law. The sense of frustration and disempowerment this creates has not been helped by the increasing complexity of the planning process and the use of consultation to legitimise decisions that many perceive may already have been taken.
    - CMS Group

Legal Developments in Hungary

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to