The Legal 500

1701 PENNSYLVANIA AVE, NW, WASHINGTON DC 20006, USA
Tel:
Work +202 857 0620
Fax:
Fax +202 659 4503
Web:
www.groom.com

Groom Law Group has been at the forefront of developments in the nation’s employee benefits laws since Congress passed ERISA in 1974, drawing many of its attorneys from the federal agencies that regulate employee benefits and forging strong ties with key players in the federal regulatory agencies and in Congress.

With 80 attorneys dedicated to the employee benefits practice, Groom offers clients unparalleled coverage of issues and disputes arising from ERISA, the Tax Code, securities laws, ACA, HIPAA, COBRA, ADEA, and the many other laws that govern employee benefits. Working in nine different practice groups, Groom’s attorneys build upon their diverse backgrounds to share a common understanding of employee benefits law that enables them to integrate their efforts across areas of specialization to produce the best results for their clients. The firm prides itself on offering state-of-the-art advice on best practices and emerging trends in employee benefits to a diverse group of clients across the country. Groom emphasizes a team approach to clients that assures responsive and efficient service.

Types of work undertaken

Executive compensation: Groom’s executive compensation group assists employers and service providers with the development of executive compensation arrangements that satisfy corporate objectives while holding up under the scrutiny of federal regulatory agencies.

Fiduciary responsibility: from the first regulations issued by the Department of Labor to issues seen in today’s news, the attorneys in Groom’s fiduciary responsibility group have helped to shape every major administrative initiative related to ERISA’s fiduciary responsibility provisions. This experience allows them to effectively represent clients with respect to DOL and IRS audits and investigations.

Governmental plans: governmental plans are some of the largest plans in the nation, and while exempt from ERISA and significant parts of the Internal Revenue Code, they are subject to state or local law and special rules under the Internal Revenue Code. The firm represents many state and local plans of all types, including code 401(a), code 403(b) and code 457 plans.

Health and welfare: Groom’s health and welfare group provides an array of services to managed care organizations, insurance companies, benefit funds, trade associations, benefits consulting firms and others on a broad range of health and welfare matters. The group is playing a major role in helping clients meet the challenges posed by federal healthcare reform legislation. Groom attorneys are also regularly called upon to advise and provide planning assistance to employers, trustees, administrators, boards of directors and other plan fiduciaries and professionals on a wide variety of ERISA and tax issues.

Litigation: the team handles benefits-related controversies ranging from routine claims disputes and federal agency investigations to ESOP litigation to complex class action and multi-district litigation for plan sponsors, financial institutions, managed care organizations, service providers, trade associations, plan fiduciaries and other clients across the country.

Multi-employer/Taft-Hartley plans: the firm’s attorneys focus on multi-employer plan issues, representing both multi-employer pension and welfare plans, as well as contributing employers, with respect to issues such as plan funding, fiduciary compliance, mass withdrawal, insolvency, and compliance with ‘endangered’ and ‘critical’ status requirements.

Plan design and taxation: the attorneys on this team work with Fortune 100 companies, national associations, government entities, churches and financial institutions to design and maintain employee benefit plans that adhere to regulatory standards and evolve to meet the needs of their sponsors.

Plan funding and restructuring: Groom’s plan funding and restructuring group negotiates and litigates complex benefits issues, and provides creative, forward-looking advice on pension and health liabilities to clients involved in corporate transactions, bankruptcies, and their business restructurings.

Policy and legislation: drawing on its substantive expertise and hands-on experience, Groom works on benefits-related policies and legislation with Congress and the executive branch on behalf of trade associations, plan sponsors, financial institutions, healthcare organizations and other clients from the benefits community.

Managing Partner Michael J Prame

Chairman Stephen M Saxon

Number of Partners: 39

Number of Other Fee-Earners: 41

Above material supplied by Groom Law Group.

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Korea strengthens taxation on multi-national enterprises in 2017

    On July 28, 2016, the Ministry of Strategy and Finance (“MOSF”) announced the annual proposal to amend the tax law for 2017 (the “Proposal”). The Proposal was submitted to the National Assembly on 2 September 2016.
  • Protecting the ‘Little-Guy’ in Distributorship Arrangements in Korea

    - Enforcement Decree to the Fair Retail Agency Transactions Act
  • Single Continuous Infringement Concept and the Practice of the Turkish Competition Authority

    The concept of a single continuous infringement (" SCI ") enables competition authorities to consider a series of agreements or conducts that have the same objective to distort competition in the market as one single continuous infringement. Similar to the approach in the European Union, the Turkish Competition Authority ( Authority ) also considers this concept while assessing a case under Article 4 of Law No 4054 on the Protection of Competition of 13 December 1994 ( Law No 4054 ), which is akin to-if not the same as-Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( TFEU ).
  • Broader Interpretation Boosts Anti-Avoidance Rules

    Businesses seeking to structure cross-border transactions in ways that help them avoid paying tax are finding it more difficult as authorities worldwide step up information sharing. One such example is the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes, which is driven by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development and has 135 members. The cabinet recently approved Thailand's membership in the forum.
  • Austria: Amendments to Gas Market Model Ordinance

    The Gas Market Model Ordinance plays a major role in the Austrian gas market, as it regulates network access and the capacity management and balancing system in Austria's three market areas: the east, Tyrol and Vorarlberg. read more...
  • [South Korea] Data Privacy Legal Update

    Proposed Amendment to the Enforcement Decree of PIPA
  • Applications under the Overseas Investment Act 2005 - a practical update

    New Zealand’s overseas investment regime has been in the media spotlight in recent times. While lobbying organisations and political parties closely scrutinise the decisions of the Overseas Investment Office ( OIO ), those in the investment community have raised concerns that the regime is overly burdensome and time consuming. Against this background, there have been a number of changes in process and regulation, with further changes in the pipeline, aimed at ensuring the regime is fit for purpose. This article provides a brief overview of the regime and then looks at some of the recent and impending developments.  
  • Arbitrators’ Liability: Austrian Supreme Court Reconfirms Strict Standards

    One of the main advantages of arbitration vis-à-vis state court litigation, is that the parties are free to choose independent and highly specialised experts to decide their cases. Yet, if these experts negligently (or even deliberately) violate the duties that come with the acceptance of the appointment, the issue of liability arises. read more...
  • On Gifts, Courtesies and Other Business Amenities

    Nurlan Sholanov Partner, AEQUITAS Law Firm
  • Promissory Note Holders Not Bound by Arbitration Clause in Underlying Contract

    This update discusses the recent case of  Rals International Pte Ltd v Cassa di Risparmio di Parma e Piacenza SpA  [2016] SGCA 53 where the Singapore Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the High Court that the assignee’s claim based on a number of promissory notes did not fall within the scope of the arbitration agreement in the underlying Supply Agreement. The assignee of such notes was therefore free to litigate in the courts.