The Legal 500

Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, L.L.P.

1050 17TH STREET NW, SUITE 800, WASHINGTON DC, 20036 5514
Washington DC, Philadelphia, New York, Denver

What we say about the firm's legal practice in US

Litigation

Within First amendment litigation and counseling: National,

Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, L.L.P.

PRACTICE: Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, L.L.P. has ‘stormed the market’, being ‘not only a top-tier firm for media law but also an incredible bargain for the cost’. The 26-lawyer media boutique specializes in First Amendment issues across offices in Washington DC, New York, Philadelphia, Denver and California. The firm is widely acknowledged to do more First Amendment work than any other in the market, and lists among its clients the major broadcasting networks and newspapers across the US. Clients note that ‘the level of service is absolutely top notch. One of the hallmarks of the firm is that it never drops any ball, no matter how small, ever’.

One highlight of 2008 was representing The New York Times in the successful defense of the appeal in the Hatfill case. The US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit unanimously upheld the first instance decision for The New York Times in a case widely recognized as an important test of the press’s ability to comment on government investigations. Also in relation to the FBI investigation into the anthrax mailings in 2001, the firm represented The New York Times and The Los Angeles Times in their effort to unseal all of the search warrant affidavits and related documents filed with the court. The court granted the newspapers’ motion in full in a case of first impression.

Also in 2008, the practice defended a documentary film about poor labor conditions on sugar plantations in the Dominican Republic against defamation claims brought by the plantation owners in Vicini v Uncommon Productions. Additionally, the practice represented the Times Herald-Record, the Pocono Record and the Colorado Springs Gazette in a number of cases involving the newspapers’ efforts to defend against subpoenas and pre-complaint petitions seeking identifying information about persons who had posted comments anonymously on the newspapers’ websites. In so doing, the practice has explored and area of First Amendment law that tests the limits of state ‘shield’ laws, the common law reporter’s privilege, and the First Amendment right to speak anonymously, and which is as yet in its infancy.

Clients say that ‘the firm is consistently outstanding. The lawyers’ advice, written product, and oral advocacy are always first-rate and their rates are reasonable. They give practical advice and always have the client’s interests in mind’.

CLIENTS: Clients include ABC, A&E Television Networks, Allbritton Communications, the Associated Press, Cablevision, CBS Broadcasting, Clear Channel Communications, The Denver Post, ESPN, Conde Nast, The Los Angeles Times, MediaNews Group, MTV, NBC Universal, Newsday, The New York Times, Time, The Tribune Company, Univision, Viacom and The Walt Disney Company.

INDIVIDUALS: Firm co-founder Lee Levine practices out of Washington DC. Clients say that ‘his reputation is unparalleled. He is in a class of his own’, ‘first-rate on appeals and has an exceptionally good understanding of media law’. His fellow co-founder, Michael Sullivan, also works in Washington DC. Clients consider him to be ‘one of the best jury trial lawyers in the country’. In New York, co-founder David Schulz is widely praised as ‘a recognized expert on freedom of information and access to the courts’. He is ‘smart, knowledgeable and responsive’. Nathan Siegel and co-founder Elizabeth Koch in Washington DC are praised along with Ashley Kissinger in Denver as ‘intellectually keen, practically competent and extremely cordial - they’re a pleasure to work with’.


What we say worldwide

Please choose another Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, L.L.P. office to view full details of what we say in that region, or choose from this list to view a specific editorial reference in context.

US

Offices in Washington DC, New York, Philadelphia, and Denver

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Mandatory Transfer pricing documentation requirements introduce into French tax law

     
    - Melot & Buchet Avocats
  • CORPORATE DEPARTMENT NEWSLETTER

    JANUARY 2010 Newsletter
    - George Y Yiangou & Co
  • DIRECTOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES IN A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

    In a Limited Liability Company (”Company”), the Director is one of the Company’s organs who oversees the activities of the Company. In overseeing the activities of the company, the Director has the right and authority to act for and on behalf of the Company.
    - Frans Winarta & Partners
  • Federal Law "On the Principles of State Regulation of Trading Activity in the Russian Federation"

    On 1 February 2010, the Federal Law "On the Principles of State Regulation of Trading Activity in the Russian Federation" (the "Law") comes into force, which will substantially change the rules applicable to trade activities.
    - Baker & McKenzie
  • New Rules for Issuing Domestic Secured Bonds In Russia

    Starting January 2010, amendments to Federal Law No. 39-FZ “On the Securities Market” dated 22 April 1996 entered into force, affecting the issue of domestic bonds by Russian issuers. The new rules will apply to all domestic bond issues to be placed in the market after 31 December 2009.
    - Baker & McKenzie
  • Funds find a New Home in Gibraltar

    Despite numerous proposed changes, Gibraltar is well placed to capitalise on to the proposed European Directive controlling Fund Managers, argues Joey Garcia
    - ISOLAS
  • 2010 quota for foreign workers distributed. List of quota-exempt professions for 2010 approved.

    In accordance with the order distributing the 2010 quota of work permits, a fixed number of work permits can be issued in each Russian region to work in different professions. Thus, for example, for Moscow the general quota for all professions is established at 250,000 work permits (which is considerably less than in 2009), and for St. Petersburg – 210,066 work permits.
    - Baker & McKenzie
  • Plant variety rights in the distribution chain

    Under the system of plant breeders rights, also known as plant variety rights, the breeder of a new variety can obtain an exclusive right to perform certain acts with respect to material [1] of his protected variety. This exclusive right comes in the form of a certificate which is granted by a body mandated to do so,[2] provided that the variety meets the grant criteria laid down in the law. Upon grant of the certificate, and sometimes ever even before, only the breeder of the protected variety[3] is entitled to (re)produce material from the variety, condition it for the purpose of propagation, offer it for sale, sell it or otherwise put it to market, export it, import it, or stock it for any of these purposes. Subject to a number of exceptions and unless authorization from the breeder is obtained, these acts are thus reserved for the breeder of the protected variety. They are referred to as the ‘reserved acts’.
    - ALTIUS (in cooperation with Tiberghien)
  • Changes to the child visitor immigration rules from 1 January 2010

    From 1 January 2010, students from countries outside the European Economic Area will be able to apply to enter the UK for up to six months on an exchange or educational visit to a state-maintained school, a non-maintained special school, an independent fee-paying school or an independent non fee-paying school. They will not require entry clearance, unless they are nationals of countries who require a visa to enter the UK.
    - Penningtons Solicitors LLP
  • Introduction of biometric processing for tier 2 in-country applications  - a reminder

    Regulations extending identity cards for foreign nationals (ICFN) to skilled workers came into force on 6 January 2010. All tier 2 applications made inside the UK now involve the enrolment of the applicant's biometric information (fingerprints and photograph).
    - Penningtons Solicitors LLP