The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Veirano Advogados

AV PRESIDENTE WILSON, 231, 25Âș ANDAR – RIO DE JANEIRO, RJ 20030-021, BRAZIL
Tel:
Work +55 21 3824 4747
Fax:
Fax +55 21 2262 4247
Email:
Web:
www.veirano.com.br
Brasilia, Porto Alegre, Rio de Janeiro, Sao Paulo
Veirano Advogados, Valdir Rocha, Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL

Lawyer rankings

Valdir Rocha

Tel:
Work +55 21 3824 4747
Email:
Web:
www.veirano.com.br
Veirano Advogados

Work Department

Intellectual Property, Media, Sports & Entertainment and Information Technology & Communications

Position

Partner

Career

Valdir Rocha is the National Practice Group Leader for the Intellectual Property Practice Group. He is recognized globally for his expertise in helping companies protect and defend their intellectual property rights.  He has advised many premier global and Latin American corporations, as well as internationally recognized brands including SC Johnson, Pfizer, Schering Plough, Nokia, Suzuki, Sandvik, Tag Heuer, ZTE, Vale, Qualcomm, Fila, Reebok, National Football League (NFL), National Basketball Association (NBA), Wyndham Hotels, Masterfoods/Mars and Marriott Hotels.

For more than three decades Mr. Rocha has provided clients with business-focused advice on registration, licensing and litigation of trademarks, industrial designs, patents, utility models, software, domain names, plant varieties and copyrights; technology transfer agreements, franchising agreements.  He has also regularly represented clients in matters related to trade names, unfair competition, trade secrets and other transactional matters associated with intellectual property rights.

Clients value Mr. Rocha’s vast experience and deep industry knowledge, along with his ability to identify unique solutions to resolve the challenging issues faced by today’s leading companies and their brands.  Working with other litigators at Veirano Advogados and the Firm’s appellate experts in Brasilia, he has successfully litigated multiple trademark, trade dress, patent, domain name and unfair competition cases for clients from Brazil, the United States, Italy, Canada and the United Kingdom.

Mr. Rocha also focuses his practice on advertising law, which includes the clearance of commercials, advertising campaigns, promotions and sweepstakes, representing world-class brands that include Microsoft, McDonald’s, Facebook, General Electric, Visa and Sony.  Mr. Rocha is a frequent speaker on these topics and represents Veirano as the Brazilian member of the Global Advertising Lawyer’s Alliance (GALA). For two years he chaired the America’s Group of this Association. Mr. Rocha has been elected Vice-Chair of GALA for a three-year period starting on January 2013.

Veirano Advogados’ Intellectual Property Practice Group was developed by Mr. Rocha and is unique in Brazil.   When he joined the Firm, Mr. Rocha was the sole intellectual property attorney and over time has recruited some of the top Intellectual Property and Trademark talent to the Firm including more than ten attorneys, as well as six patent engineers accomplished in the various aspects of Intellectual Property law.

Languages

Portuguese, English, Spanish and French

Member

Brazilian Intellectual Property Association (ABPI), Board Member
Brazilian Association of Industrial Property Agents (ABAPI) Former Chairman of the Ethics Board
Global Advertising Lawyers Association (GALA), Past Regional President (Americas) and Board Member and Vice-Chair (2013/2015)
International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (AIPPI), former Membership Committee member and Brazilian Delegate to ExCom in India (2011) and Korea (2012)
International Bar Association (IBA), former vice chairman of the Patent and Trademark Committees and former Officer of Franchising Committee
International Franchising Lawyers Association (IFLA), Sole Brazilian member
International Trademark Association (INTA), Brazilian Reporter to International Annual Review of Trademark Jurisprudence for sixteen years, former member of the Editorial Board and the Anti-counterfeiting Committee and of the Bulletin Committee. Current member of the Enforcement Committee.
Brazilian Bar Association (OAB) – Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo and Rio Grande do Sul

Education

LL.B, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), 1981

Patents, McGill University, Canada, July/August 2009
Alternative Dispute Resolution in Intellectual Property, Columbia University, NY, 1997
Drafting of Contracts in English, Universidade Cândido Mendes, Rio de Janeiro, 1992
Course on Author’s Rights, Brazilian National Library Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, 1985
Business English, Curso Oxford, Rio de Janeiro, 1985
Verbal Communication for Executives, Fundação Getulio Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, 1984


Brazil

Intellectual property

Within: Intellectual property

Veirano Advogados has a broad take on IP matters, covering copyright, domain names, patents and advertising, as well as IT and media and entertainment law matters. The group frequently oversees its clients' entire trade mark portfolios in Brazil; for example, it is retained by chemicals and biotechnology company Lonza Group, for which the team handle matters including trade mark infringement and unfair competition litigation. Valdir de Oliveira Rocha Filho and Fåbio Pereira are the key partners.

[back to top]

TMT

Within: TMT

Veirano Advogados is recommended for tech and media work, with Valdir Rocha strong at advertising law and corporate lawyer Robson Barreto is experienced at handling IT matters. Clients include Dell, Fox Channels, HBO, Nokia and TIM.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • CommuniquĂ© on Equity Crowdfunding Is Officially Published

    By way of background, in January 2019, the Capital Markets Board (“ CMB ”) had issued an announcement on its website on the Draft CommuniquĂ© on Equity Crowdfunding [1] . The CMB has now officially published the CommuniquĂ© on Crowdfunding No. III-35/A (“ CommuniquĂ© ”), on October 3, 2019. The CommuniquĂ© entered into force as of October 3, 2019.
  • Beneficial Ownership Concept new interpretation from the Russian federal tax service

    The recent interpretative letter issued by the Russian Federal Tax Services (“FTS”) on 08th August 2019, has provided further guidance as to the application of the Beneficial Ownership Concept, further to the letter initially provided on the 12th of April 2018 which adopted a strict approach of the concept. 
  • Cyprus and Netherlands Double Tax Treaty Update

    Cyprus has concluded the negotiations for the avoidance of double taxation with the Netherlands. The double tax treaty was agreed at technocratic level in Hague. It is expected to be signed by the end of 2019 or early in 2020.
  • Vacancy - Senior Corporate Lawyer

    The Senior Corporate Lawyer, who will be reporting to Partners, will be working with both the firm’s legal team as well as the financial services team. The successful candidate will be requested to show initiative, take on certain responsibilities within the firm, work in a multinational environment and will immediately be given the opportunity to further advance their career within the law firm.
  • CJEU RULED ON THE APPLICATION OF THE BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP CONCEPT

    The judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on February 26, 2019, in the “Danish Beneficial Ownership Cases”, can be perceived as a landmark on the interpretation of the Beneficial Ownership concept under the Interest and Royalties Directive (IRD) and the Parent-Subsidiary Directive (PSD).
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‘centre of life test’ in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of  ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan   [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the “Regulations”). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess  Surinder Singh  cases that appear before them.
  • ITALIAN RULES ON JOINT VENTURES IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AND CONCESSIONS

    Italian rules on jointventures concerning public procurement and concession contracts are set out inlight of the European legal framework provided for in Directive 2014/23/EU and 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. The European rules aim to ensurethe best use of public money so that EU citizens benefit from strategicinvestments and services at fair prices. In this context, public procurementand concessions represent key instruments that need to be regulated and standardisedin order to ensure free movement of goods, freedom of establishment and freedomto provide services.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a  sole representative visa  is not “a  majority shareholder in the overseas business”.