The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Veirano Advogados

AV BRIGADEIRO FARIA LIMA ,3477, 16º ANDAR – SÃO PAULO, SP 04538-133, BRAZIL
Tel:
Work +55 11 5505 4001
Fax:
Fax +55 11 5505 3990
Email:
Web:
www.veirano.com.br
Veirano Advogados, Marco Monteiro, Sao Paulo, BRAZIL

Lawyer rankings

Marco Monteiro

Tel:
Work +55 11 2313 5700
Email:
Web:
www.veirano.com.br
Veirano Advogados

Work Department

 Tax & Customs

Position

Partner

Career

Mr. Monteiro is a partner with a practice emphasis in tax planning and consulting, as well as tax litigation. He has extensive experience assisting Brazilian and international clients in connection with mergers and acquisitions, corporate reorganizations, cross-border transactions, debt and equity securities, imports/exports and routine tax issues. He represents clients in both tax issues related to foreign investment in Brazil and Brazilian investment abroad.

Mr. Monteiro represents clients from many different industries, such as energy, telecommunications and IT, entertainment, automotive and auto-parts, electronics, construction and infrastructure. Mr. Monteiro is particularly skilled at assisting foreign companies with selecting the right corporate structure from a Brazilian tax perspective and helping them learn how to navigate Brazil’s complex tax regulations.

Languages

English and Portuguese

Member

Brazilian Bar Association (OAB) – São Paulo

Education

LL.M with distinction, Taxation, Georgetown University Law Center, Thomas Bradbury Chetwood, S.J. Prize for best academic record, Washington, DC, 2008

LL.B, Universidade de Sao Paulo (USP), 2002
Tax Law Specialist Graduate Certificate,
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV-SP), São Paulo, 2006


Brazil

Tax

Within: Tax

The 'always extremely professional' lawyers in Veirano Advogados' tax department 'are open to work as a team' and are also praised for their 'rapid responses to client demands' and 'excellent litigation skills'. The team is split between four offices, and handles a range of transactional tax and standalone tax matters. Litigation highlights included João Agripino Maia's defence of Claro in a case involving the deduction of amortisation expenses of the goodwill paid for an acquisition. Practice head Marcelo Reinecken is 'an exceptional lawyer for complex tax litigation and consultation'. Abel Amaro is well versed in indirect tax and customs. Also receiving praise are Ian Muniz, Marco Antonio Monteiro, the 'highly committed' Ari Job Junior and 'young and talented lawyer' Filipe Richter.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Communiqué on Equity Crowdfunding Is Officially Published

    By way of background, in January 2019, the Capital Markets Board (“ CMB ”) had issued an announcement on its website on the Draft Communiqué on Equity Crowdfunding [1] . The CMB has now officially published the Communiqué on Crowdfunding No. III-35/A (“ Communiqué ”), on October 3, 2019. The Communiqué entered into force as of October 3, 2019.
  • Beneficial Ownership Concept new interpretation from the Russian federal tax service

    The recent interpretative letter issued by the Russian Federal Tax Services (“FTS”) on 08th August 2019, has provided further guidance as to the application of the Beneficial Ownership Concept, further to the letter initially provided on the 12th of April 2018 which adopted a strict approach of the concept. 
  • Cyprus and Netherlands Double Tax Treaty Update

    Cyprus has concluded the negotiations for the avoidance of double taxation with the Netherlands. The double tax treaty was agreed at technocratic level in Hague. It is expected to be signed by the end of 2019 or early in 2020.
  • Vacancy - Senior Corporate Lawyer

    The Senior Corporate Lawyer, who will be reporting to Partners, will be working with both the firm’s legal team as well as the financial services team. The successful candidate will be requested to show initiative, take on certain responsibilities within the firm, work in a multinational environment and will immediately be given the opportunity to further advance their career within the law firm.
  • CJEU RULED ON THE APPLICATION OF THE BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP CONCEPT

    The judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on February 26, 2019, in the “Danish Beneficial Ownership Cases”, can be perceived as a landmark on the interpretation of the Beneficial Ownership concept under the Interest and Royalties Directive (IRD) and the Parent-Subsidiary Directive (PSD).
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‘centre of life test’ in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of  ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan   [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the “Regulations”). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess  Surinder Singh  cases that appear before them.
  • ITALIAN RULES ON JOINT VENTURES IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AND CONCESSIONS

    Italian rules on jointventures concerning public procurement and concession contracts are set out inlight of the European legal framework provided for in Directive 2014/23/EU and 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. The European rules aim to ensurethe best use of public money so that EU citizens benefit from strategicinvestments and services at fair prices. In this context, public procurementand concessions represent key instruments that need to be regulated and standardisedin order to ensure free movement of goods, freedom of establishment and freedomto provide services.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a  sole representative visa  is not “a  majority shareholder in the overseas business”.