The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Winston & Strawn London LLP

Work 020 7011 8700
Fax 020 7011 8800


The firm: Founded in 1853, Winston & Strawn LLP is an international law firm with more than 900 attorneys among 17 offices across Europe, the Middle East, Asia and North America.

In the UK, Winston focuses on capital markets and securitisation, cross-border M&A and finance, project and transportation finance, privacy and data security, private equity and venture capital, tax, litigation, international arbitration, contentious regulatory, and antitrust/competition services.

Types of work undertaken:Corporate and finance: Winston√ʬĬôs corporate practice provides securities and M&A services to multinational companies and investment banks. The firm√ʬĬôs private equity work encompasses capital raising, investment and divestiture, and operational activities. It represents clients in capital markets, corporate lending, project finance, transportation finance, securitisation, lease finance, and derivatives transactions and provides restructuring and insolvency advice.

The firm advises public and private companies, leading financial institutions, private equity and investment funds, funding sources, investors, and emerging companies on a broad range of high-profile cross-border transactions. Its lawyers in the financial services practice assist clients in bank regulatory and compliance, investment management, private funds, broker-dealer, initial public offerings, futures/exchange matters, and transportation/aviation finance.

Project finance: Winston has advised public and private lenders, project sponsors and developers, host governments, off-takers, and other project counter-parties and participants on a broad range of non-recourse and limited recourse financings. With broad country and industry experience, its team has structured, negotiated and closed complex √ʬĬėfirst of their kind√ʬĬô projects and related financings across a wide range of sectors and jurisdictions.

Litigation: Winston is a dispute resolution powerhouse, routinely handling some of the most critical disputes faced by companies, governments and individuals. The London litigation team focuses on complex commercial litigation, contentious regulatory and investigations, and arbitration and mediation in a variety of practice areas, including fraud and white-collar crime, antitrust/competition, commercial, securities, trade and insolvency matters, as well as regulatory investigations and disciplinary proceedings.

Winston√ʬĬôs lawyers have been involved in some of the most innovative litigation before the English courts across the commercial spectrum. Cases have ranged from injunctions to protect confidential information, to innovative litigation to protect brands, complex tax litigation, real estate litigation and accounting disputes. The breadth of the firm√ʬĬôs contentious experience ideally positions it to handle multi-disciplinary and large-scale cross-border issues.

EU antitrust/competition: Winston√ʬĬôs experienced EU antitrust/competition team has a distinguished reputation for successfully advising high-profile clients on a full range of competition and regulatory issues. The team regularly assists companies, industry associations and governments in navigating applicable laws and regulations to achieve their strategic business goals √ʬĬď often via the development of creative strategies. Winston√ʬĬôs EU competition lawyers also represent clients on a variety of EU high-stakes competition matters before the European Commission, EU member state authorities, and the European community courts.

International arbitration: the firm√ʬĬôs international arbitration practice is well-known for both commercial and investor-state arbitration. Winston acts for a broad range of companies, governments, and individuals, representing them on some of the largest and most complex multi-jurisdictional disputes in the world. The firm also excels in mid-sized, commercial arbitration, and a variety of mediation proceedings, as well as court actions enforcing or challenging arbitral awards.

Other offices: Brussels, Charlotte, Chicago, Dallas, Dubai, Hong Kong, Houston, Los Angeles, Moscow, New York, Newark, Paris, San Francisco, Shanghai, Silicon Valley and Washington, DC.


  • Number of resident fee-earners: 39

Above material supplied by Winston & Strawn London LLP.

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Gulbenkian Andonain discuss NEW Tier 1 Start-Up Visa and the NEW Tier 1 Innovator Visa

    The document entitled "Statement of Changes to Immigration Rules" which was released by the House of Commons on the 7th March 2019, outlined and advised us on a number of changes that will come into place that will affect the Tier 1 Investor Visa amongst other visa programmes and schemes. The latest article on our website discusses both of these new UK business visa routes. Our immigration lawyers London are already up to date on all of the required information for both the NEW Tier 1 Start-Up Visa and the NEW Tier 1 Innovator Visa .
  • Upcoming Changes to the UK Tier 1 Investor Visa

    According to the new document from the House of Commons on March 7th 2019 titled ‚ÄúStatement of Changes to Immigration Rules‚ÄĚ, a number of changes will come into place that affecting the Tier 1 UK Investor Visa programme amongst other visa programmes and schemes.
  • Brexit and non-EU Immigration

    There is no doubt that the UK has to date benefited immensely from visa-free EU immigration to the extent that visa conditions and caps on non-EU migrant have undermined and overshadowed the ability of this group to play a prominent role in British industry and commerce and in its expanding and overburdened NHS service. It is the view of  Gulbenkian Andonian  however, that after  Brexit, there should be a noticeable change in those skilled non-EU migrants contributing to British society in a meaningful way. 
  • Gulbenkian Andonian Solicitors discuss Post Brexit scenarios - EU Nationals and Salient Immigration

    From 1 January 2021 everyone except for British and Irish citizens will be subject to immigration control in the UK.   Gulbenkian Andonian solicitors has already published an article on this topic of post- Brexit immigration and has discussed the case of EU nationals and family members after Brexit, you can find that article here as one of many in our blog .

    Tescoadmitted wrongdoing over its accounting scandal in order to obtain a deferredprosecution agreement and avoid a conviction. But with everyone charged overthe scandal having been cleared, Aziz Rahman examines whether the deferredprosecution agreement process needs revising.

    With Standard Bank having become the first organisation to conclude a DPA, Aziz Rahman explains why gaining one is only the start of the challenge.

    The sacking of Nissan’s high-profile chairman may have beenproof that nobody is infallible. But Nicola Sharp argues that it should also beseen as an indicator that no company can be considered safe from wrongdoing.
  • Applying for A Sole Representative Visa

    Regardless of the Brexit outcome, the United Kingdom will remain one of the world most powerful economies. With a market of 65 million people and close ties with Europe, many overseas-based organisations look to establishing a subsidiary or branch office in Britain.

    Aziz Rahman considers the Ericsson bribery investigation and outlines how best to respond if you are investigated by more than one law enforcement agency
  • Have Changes to The Spouse/Civil Partnership Minimum Income Threshold Made A Difference?

    The plight of those denied a UK Spouse/CivilPartnership Visa or a Spouse/Civil Partnership Visa extension continues to feature in the headlines.   In August 2018, the Guardian reported on one young woman, driven to attempt suicide after her fiancé, an Albanian national, was not permitted to enter the country.   The Home Office ruled Paige Smith, a British Citizen, did not meet the £18,600 income threshold.   It later transpired the Home Office lost a crucial payslip proving that Ms Smith met the criteria, a document the department had been sent four times by a Solicitor and Ms Smith’s MP.   The appeal Judge took ten minutes to rule the Visa should have been approved; however, the couple still had to wait two months for the Home Office to declare it would not appeal the decision.