The Legal 500

Sullivan & Cromwell LLP

1 NEW FETTER LANE, LONDON, EC4A 1AN, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7959 8900
Fax:
Fax 020 7959 8950
Web:
www.sullcrom.com
Email:

What we say about the firm's legal practice in London

Corporate and commercial

Within Corporate tax Corporate tax

Within Equity capital markets: UK capability, tier 5

At Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, Vanessa Blackmore advised Pershing Square as a founding shareholder in the £900m IPO and London listing of Justice Holdings, and also represented the underwriters, including Goldman Sachs, in Mail.ru Group’s IPO and London listing. With particular strength on the issuer side, the team also advised Kenmare Resources in a $270m rights offering.

Within Equity capital markets: US capability, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP is a first tier firm,

Sullivan & Cromwell LLP is noted for its ‘excellent’ advice. In 2010, John O’Connor acted as US counsel to Standard Chartered Bank in a $5.4bn rights offering, and also advised Enel Green Power in its €2.6bn IPO. Kathryn Campbell advised Wil. Wilhemsen on a NOK1.45bn IPO and listing on the Oslo Stock Exchange. William Plapinger and David Rockwell are recommended.

Within EU and competition EU and competition

Within M&A: upper mid-market and premium deals, 250m+, tier 6

Sullivan & Cromwell LLP has in Tim Emmersonone of the premier public company lawyers in the UK market’. In total the London practice worked on 23 UK M&A deals in 2010, notably advising Goldman Sachs PIA on its acquisition of Ontex for around €1.2bn, and handling a string of mandates for Rio Tinto in the divestment of its Alcan Global Packaging businesses.

Within M&A: US law capability, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP is a first tier firm,

Sullivan & Cromwell LLP advised longstanding client Goldman Sachs on Seawell’s $890m acquisition of Allis-Chalmers Energy, led by the highly rated William Plapinger. New office head Richard Morrissey and Stewart Robertson led a team that advised BP on its $7.1bn sale of its interest in Pan American Energy to Bridas Corporation.

Within Private equity: transactions , tier 7

City grandee of the takeover marketTim Emmerson is recommended at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP.

Finance

Within Debt capital markets, tier 5

Sullivan & Cromwell LLP joins the ranking in recognition of Vanessa Blackmore and William Plapinger’s work on deals such as BG Energy’s $1bn issue and their longstanding role as counsel to Goldman Sachs.

Projects, energy and natural resources

Within Infrastructure, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP is a third tier firm,

The mainstay of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP’s practice is project finance, with a weighting towards the energy and mining sectors. Jamie Logie recently advised on the English law aspects of the financing of the $823m Boleo mining project in Mexico.

Within Mining and minerals, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP is a second tier firm,

Sullivan & Cromwell LLP has ‘good mining industry knowledge’, with Jamie Logie singled out as a ‘very constructive and lateral thinker’. The firm advised the commercial bank lenders on the Boleo mining project on intercreditor issues and related commodities hedging.

Within Oil and gas, tier 4

Sullivan & Cromwell LLP handles a healthy mix of project finance, M&A and capital markets work. On the projects side, it is acting as sole international finance counsel to the project company on the development of the $3.9bn Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline.


Further information on Sullivan & Cromwell LLP

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Sullivan & Cromwell LLP in other jurisdictions.

London

Offices in London

United States

Offices in Washington DC, New York, Los Angeles, and Palo Alto

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • HOUSING

    In Nzinga Maswaku v Westminster City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 669 the Court of Appeal clarified that in offering a homeless person with alternative temporary accommodation the local authority is obliged to point that if the offer is refused it has discharged its Part VII duties under the Housing Act 1996.
    - 11KBW
  • COUNCIL TAX

    In Harrow LBC v Ayiku [2012] EWHC 1200 (Admin) Sales J held that the word “or” in the Council Tax (Exempt Dwellings) Order 1992, art 3 Class N, had a disjunctive meaning, therefore it was sufficient for the non-British spouse of a foreign student to satisfy one or other of the two conditions, namely being prevented from taking paid employment or being prevented from claiming benefits, in order to qualify as a “relevant person” who was exempted from liability to pay council tax.
    - 11KBW
  • QUEEN’S SPEECH

    Bills already introduced pursuant to the Queen’s Speech on 9 May 2012 include Local Government Finance Bill and Electoral Registration and Administration Bill, both accompanied by Explanatory Notes, which in each case address ECHR compatibility.
    - 11KBW
  • Standards

    In R (Calver) v Adjudication Panel for Wales [2012] EWHC 1172 (Admin) Mr Calver was a member of Manorbier Community Council who successfully challenged the decision of the Panel to dismiss his appeal against a decision by Prembrokeshire County Council Standards Committee censuring him for a number of comments or blogs posted by him on a website he owned and controlled.
    - 11KBW
  • A justified retrospective

    Clive Sheldon - QC debates the pros & cons of retrospective tax legislation
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty (“PSED”)

    In R (Greenwich Community Law Centre) v Greenwich LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 496 the Court of Appeal held that the Council had had “due regard to the PSED when making changes to its funding of community legal advice services”. At para 30 Elias LJ said:
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty

    Surrey County Council conducted a review of its Library Service. This culminated in a Report to the Council’s Cabinet. The Recommendations in the Report included that there should be consultation about a community-partnership approach at selected Libraries.
    - 11KBW
  • Judicial Review

    The Judgment of Lindblom J in The Manydown Co Ltd v Basingstoke and Deane BC [2012] EWHC 977 (Admin) repays attention. The Claimant sought to challenge by judicial review 2 decisions of the Council: (1) the Council’s refusal to reconsider its position on the development of a site that it owns (and is the subject matter of a Joint Development Partnership Agreement with the Claimant); and (2) a decision of the Council’s Cabinet approving a selection of sites for development which did not include this site.
    - 11KBW
  • The Health and Social Care Act 2012: impact on adult social services

    After its torrid passage through Parliament, the Health and Social Care Bill received Royal Assent on 27 March 2012. The Act deals principally with healthcare reform, but it also contains some amendments to the legislative framework for social care. It will come into force on a day yet to be appointed by the Secretary of State.
    - 11KBW
  • Immigration update May 2012

    In this issue: