The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Paul Hastings LLP

55 SECOND STREET, 24TH FLOOR, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105, USA
Tel:
Work +1 415 856 7000
Fax:
Fax +1 415 856 7100
Web:
www.paulhastings.com
Atlanta, Beijing, Brussels, Chicago, Costa Mesa, Frankfurt and 15 more

Holly House

Tel:
Work 415-856-7000
Email:
Paul Hastings LLP

Work Department

Litigation; Antitrust and Competition

Position

Holly House is an Antitrust and Competition partner in the Litigation Department of Paul Hastings. Her practice focuses on antitrust and trade regulation matters as well as intellectual property disputes. Ms. House has successfully represented premier clients as both plaintiffs and defendants in myriad types of complex commercial and class action disputes, including at several notable trials. Ms. House is the past chair of the California State Bar’s Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Section. She has been named one of the "Top 250 Women in Litigation" and a "Local Litigation Star" in the inaugural 2013 edition of Benchmark Litigation, "Top 75 California Women Litigators” by the Daily Journal in 2010 and 2011, one of the Best Lawyers in America since 2005, one of the top 50 women lawyers in Northern California in 2011 and 2012, and a Northern California “Super Lawyer” since this peer award was first offered. Ms. House has also repeatedly been named one of the top antitrust lawyers in the United States by Chambers USA, where sources single her out as “a reliable and responsive, business-savvy practitioner” and "a long-standing, diligent antitrust attorney -- she commands great respect."

Career

- Leading defense team for LG Display in TFT-LCD Flat Panel Screens MDL in the Northern District of California. - Led the damages effort and on trial team for Oracle Corporation that yielded a $1.3 billion verdict against SAP AG, SAP America and TomorrowNow for improper infringement and misuse of Oracle’s proprietary service and support software; this was the largest jury verdict of 2010 and the largest copyright verdict ever. - Represented IKON Office Solutions in antitrust actions brought by independent servicer competitors who are complaining about IKON’s leasing practices and pursuing single-brand aftermarket domination claims. - Assisted in defense of Intel Corporation in civil purported antitrust class actions related to Intel’s and other Silicon Valley companies’ hiring practices Was on team representing Anadarko Petroleum in connection with Louisiana oil spill litigation against BP - Represented SanDisk Corp. in antitrust litigation in EDVA “rocket docket” seeking determination that MPEG patent pool was anti-competitive - Defended luxury goods conglomerate LVMH Moet Hennessy – Louis Vuitton and international trading giant Mitsui Co. Ltd. (and its subsidiaries) in complex multidistrict price-fixing litigations involving prestige cosmetics and the food additive methionine Key member of team that represented Oracle Corporation in California state action brought by PeopleSoft in connection with PeopleSoft’s efforts to avoid acquisition by Oracle - Member of team which represented California Department of Water Resources (DWR) in dispute with energy supplier Sempra stemming from the California energy crisis; arbitration panel awarded $75 million to DWR in the first phase of the dispute Lead counsel for high-tech storage company Adaptec Inc. in dispute with company it had acquired yielding client $53+ million arbitration result Part of teams which represented electronic payment company First Data Corporation in actions brought by DOJ to block acquisition of Concord and investigating practices of subsidiary Western Union - Secured $50 million settlement for national real estate developer suing Indian tribe over casino development - Represented Covad Communications in its successful battles to compete in the dynamic broadband market, including $30 million arbitration result against SBC Communications - Defended National Football League in a heated dispute with Oakland Raiders involving intellectual property, contract, derivative and other claims summary; adjudication for NFL granted - Defended Eastman Kodak in all stages of ITS v. Kodak, a groundbreaking antitrust suit brought by independent service organizations regarding access to service parts that included several appeals (including to the U.S. Supreme Court) and a jury trial Represented Frito-Lay Inc. against suit brought by California Attorney General under Proposition 65

Member

Adviser, State Bar of California’s Antitrust and Unfair Competition Section (2005–present) Chair of Executive Committee, State Bar of California’s Antitrust and Unfair Competition Section (2004–2005) First vice chair, vice chair (Golden State Institute), secretary-treasurer and editor of Competition, Executive Committee, State Bar of California’s Antitrust and Unfair Competition Section (past) ABA Antitrust Section

Education

Ms. House received her J.D. from Harvard Law School in 1988 and her B.A. from Smith College, magna cum laude, in 1984.


United States: Antitrust

Civil litigation/class actions

Within: Civil litigation/class actions

Paul Hastings LLP’s practice is spearheaded from Washington DC by global antitrust head Scott Hataway, who is a former trial attorney at the DOJ’s Antitrust Division. Other key individuals are San Francisco-based Holly House and Sean Unger, who defended LG Display and its US subsidiary in the multi-district price-fixing TFT-LCD antitrust litigation. In another highlight, House is acting as co-counsel to plaintiff Cave Consulting in a case against OptumInsight involving an alleged ‘Walker Process’ antitrust violation. Elsewhere, the firm defended Sara Lee against claims of price-fixing and unlawful territorial allocations with distributors. Thomas Brown (San Francisco) and MJ Moltenbrey (Washington DC) are recommended. Lee Berger joined the DOJ’s Antitrust Division as a trial attorney.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Awards of excessive compensation under Turkish Intellectual and Industrial Property Law

    Introduction
  • EU: High-Level Expert Group on Sustainable Finance delivers early recommendations

    On 13 July 2017, the High-Level Expert Group (" HLEG ") on Sustainable Finance published its interim report (" Interim Report ") setting out concrete steps to create a financial system that supports sustainable investments. This Legal Insight is part of our dedicated newsletter series on the European Capital Markets Union (" CMU "). Background The growing awareness of environmental challenges and sustainability risks as well as the adoption of the UN 2030 Agenda and the conclusion of the Paris Climate Agreement by the EU in 2015 call for an EU strategy on sustainable finance. Establishing an EU strategy on sustainable finance is a priority action of the CMU. In December 2016, the HLEG was established to advise on the development of such an EU strategy . The recently published HLEG Interim Report was recently presented in a public hearing on sustainable finance on 18 July 2017. At the same time, the HLEG presented an online questionnaire on the Interim Report aimed at obtaining targeted feedback until 20 September 2017, which would be reflected in the final report of the HLEG scheduled for publication by the end of 2017.
  • Serbian Competition Authority Steps Up Antritrust Enforcement

    The Serbian Commission for Protection of Competition (the " Commissio n") recently intensified its antitrust activities before the new Administrative Act came into effect. In one week alone the Commission initiated four antitrust cases and conducted two dawn raids. 1. What/who will be on the Commission's radar?
  • First Annual Privacy Shield Review to take place in September 2017

    One of the core principles of the EU-US Privacy Shield (" Privacy Shield ") is its Joint Review mechanism, which obliges the European Commission, the US Department of Commerce and the Federal Trade Commission to jointly review the functioning of the Privacy Shield on an annual basis, together with its national security and law enforcement aspects. The very first Joint Review is scheduled for September 2017. This first review is considered especially important, as it will be the first opportunity for US and EU regulators to closely analyse the operation of the Privacy Shield, address possible concerns about its functioning, and seek to ensure that the Privacy Shield continues to be a valid legal basis for transfers of personal data from the EU to the US.
  • The role of the supervisory board in investor relations

    1.Abstract
    - Dorda
  • An Introduction to Personal Guarantee

    The economic boom in UAE has resulted in huge developments and a considerable increase in trade. This in turn has led to a rise in transactions which require a fast debt recovery mechanism. According to common practice in the UAE, the most secure and quickest method is the post-dated -  and in some cases undated – cheque. This is often requested by creditors (financial institutions) and sellers, mostly in real estate transactions and trade. The rationale is mostly economic to individuals who are issuing the cheque, and how does personal guarantee play a role? In this Article, we attempt to analyze and overview UAE laws on Personal guarantee.
  • [Legal Update] Proposed Amendment to Reduce Capital Gains Exemptions...

    The Ministry of Strategy and Finance announced its proposed tax law amendments for 2018 on August 2, 2017. This tax alert highlights the proposed change to the capital gains exemption currently available to foreign investors engaged in on-the-market transactions.
  • Constitutional Court's Recent Judgments on Rent in Austria

    The Constitutional Court has recently provided two judgments on 28 June 2017 on the rent control legislation in Austria ruling that the current system for flats complies with Austrian Constitutional Law and the European Convention on Human Rights. The Constitutional Court visibly failed to take the opportunity to initiate a change to the current legislation. Further appeals to the Constitutional Court are likely and worthwhile with the Austrian parties currently involved in their campaigns for the general election in October 2017.
    - Dorda
  • The importance of the effective date in tax laws

    8 Aug 2017 at 04:00 / NEWSPAPER SECTION: BUSINESS
  • NON-DELIVERY PLEDGES OVER MOVABLES

    Law on Pledges over Movable Property in Commercial Transactions No. 6750 is published in the Official Gazette No. 29871 and dated October 28, 2016 and entered into force as of January 1, 2017. Law on Pledges over Movable Property in Commercial Transactions No. 6750 abolished the Commercial Enterprise Pledges Law No. 1447 and dated July 21, 1971 and introduced many new innovations to movable pledges. However, Commercial Enterprise Pledges Law No. 1447 will remain applicable for commercial enterprise pledges that are already established before 1 January 2017.