The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Mayer Brown

Work +1 312 782 0600
Fax +1 312 701 7711

Charles Rothfeld

Work +1 202 263 3233
Mayer Brown

Work Department



Charles Rothfeld, recognized by the National Law Journal in 2012 as "one of the leading members of the Supreme Court bar" and by USA Today as "part of an emerging elite private-sector group of lawyers who dominate advocacy at the Supreme Court," focuses his practice on Supreme Court and appellate litigation. His appellate experience has earned him listings in Chambers USA and Best Lawyers in America, and repeated recognition as one of "Washington’s top lawyers" by Washingtonian Magazine. He has worked on more than 200 cases before the United States Supreme Court and on hundreds of other cases before federal and state appellate courts. Charles has argued 28 cases before the US Supreme Court, most recently in January and March 2012. Since joining Mayer Brown in 1991, Charles has represented foreign governments, states, municipalities, members of Congress, Indian tribes, and groups of state and local officials before the Supreme Court. His representations also have included Fortune 500 companies and other businesses in a range of industries, for which he has worked in cases involving various aspects of constitutional law — including the Commerce and Due Process clauses, the First Amendment, and the Twenty-first Amendment — as well as antitrust, securities regulation, federal preemption, taxation, ERISA, banking, criminal law, and the Alien Tort Statute. Among his recent Supreme Court cases, Charles successfully argued before the Court on behalf of the Republic of the Philippines and the Philippine National Bank in an effort to reclaim assets stolen by former Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos. He also prevailed in Polar Tankers, Inc. v. City of Valdez, the first case since the nineteenth century in which the Court invalidated a state tax under the Constitution’s Tonnage Clause. Charles is a founder and co-director of the Yale Law School’s Supreme Court Clinic, which is among the largest and most successful appellate advocacy programs in the nation. Over the past six years, students in the Yale Clinic have worked on almost 50 cases in the Supreme Court at the merits and certiorari petition stages. In addition, Charles is a member of the Board of Advisors of Georgetown University Law Center’s Supreme Court Institute. He also has served as a faculty member in the National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG) Supreme Court advocacy program and is a judge in NAAG’s annual “Best Supreme Court Brief” competition. He is a regular participant in moot courts for NAAG, the Chamber of Commerce, and the Georgetown Supreme Court Institute. He has published widely on the Supreme Court, the Constitution, and appellate advocacy, and he is one of the co-authors of Mayer Brown’s treatise on practice in the federal courts of appeals. Prior to joining Mayer Brown, Charles served as Special Counsel for the State and Local Legal Center (1988–1990) and as Assistant to the Solicitor General, US Department of Justice (1984–1988), where he had primary responsibility for handling the government’s Supreme Court litigation in the areas of banking and securities regulation. From 1982 to 1984, he worked with another law firm in Washington, DC. Earlier, Charles served as Law Clerk to Justice Harry A. Blackmun, US Supreme Court (1981–1982) and to Chief Judge Spottswood W. Robinson III, US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (1980–1981).


The University of Chicago Law School, JD, cum laude 1980 Articles Editor, University of Chicago Law Review Joseph Henry Beale Prize for outstanding legal writing Cornell University, AB, cum laude 1977 Editor-in-Chief, Cornell Daily Sun

United States: Dispute resolution


Within: Appellate

‘Gold standard advice’ attracts the most complex mandates at Mayer Brown’s ‘outstanding’ team of ‘superstars, who think beyond the case to see the big picture and plan for it’. The group houses ‘exceptional partners, whose high-octane brain power provides actionable solutions and competitive business advantage’. Andrew Pincus, whose ‘oral advocacy and strategic acumen are unsurpassed’, argued for the petitioner in Impression Products, Inc. v Lexmark International, Inc, the US Supreme Court patent infringement appeal; Paul Hughes was also part of the team, which secured a 7-1 victory. A team led by Pincus obtained another 7-1 judgment in the US Supreme Court in Kindred Nursing Centers Limited Partnership v Clark, also acting for the petitioner. Evan Tager ‘has a jeweler’s eye for legal issues, sees things that no one else does, and communicates them to courts as no one else can’. Both Brian Netter and Michael Kimberly ‘produce jaw-droppingly good work and are a joy to work with’. Charles Rothfeld is also recommended.

[back to top]

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to