The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon
CALLE 67 NO. 7-35, OF. 1204, BOGOTÁ, COLOMBIA
Tel:
Work +57 1 319 2900
Fax:
Fax +57 1 3121 0295
Email:
Web:
www.gomezpinzon.com
Bogota, Medellin

David Araque

Tel:
Work +57 1 319 2900 Ext. 274
Email:
Web:
www.gomezpinzon.com
Gómez-Pinzón Abogados

Work Department

Dispute Resolution & Investment Protection

Position

Partner.

Career

He has more than 15 years of experience in commercial transactions, domestic litigation and national and international arbitration, in areas that include construction, commercial distribution of goods and services, infrastructure and, in general, in complex commercial disputes.

David has represented several national and multinational companies in commercial litigation before Colombian courts and arbitration courts. Likewise, he has provided advice on issues of contractual and extracontractual liability of the producer / manufacturer, as well as in various group and popular actions in the defense of various multinationals in environmental matters, personal injuries and consumer protection rules.

He has been professor of the Universidad de los Andes in Roman Law, Business Law and Obligations (Civil Liability, Effects, Transmission and Termination of Obligations).

Languages

English, Spanish

Education

Attorney from Universidad de Los Andes; Specialist in Financial & Banking Law from the same University and LL.M with distinction in International and Comparative Dispute Resolution from Queen Mary University of London.


Colombia: Dispute resolution

Arbitration

Within: Arbitration

William Araque, who ‘stands out for his broad knowledge in arbitration’, leads the 16-strong team at Gómez-Pinzón Abogados (GPA), which acts for both private and state parties in national and international arbitration proceedings. Acting in conjunction with David Araque, he recently led the successful advice to IGT Games in arbitration proceedings involving state entity Coljuegos concerning an alleged breach of concession contract by IGT and the use of the "Baloto" brand. In other work, the team continues to represent Reficar in two arbitration procedures against EPC contractors and supervisors. Senior associate Natalia Castellanos is also noted.

[back to top]

Litigation

Within: Next Generation Partners

David Araque - Gómez-Pinzón Abogados (GPA)

Within: Litigation

The ‘results-oriented’ Gómez-Pinzón Abogados (GPA) is ‘outstanding in getting to know the business in order to give in-depth legal opinions, and not just providing off the book concepts and recommendations’. A very well-reputed figure in the field, William Araque heads the 16-strong team, with David Araque as co-director of the dispute resolution and investment protection practice. Both are particularly recommended for - among other skills - developing ‘relationships of trust generating a strong synergy’. The practice is continuing to act for Chevron on a $20m domestic litigation regarding the tariff that gas transporters or producers in Colombia may effectively charge purchasers. The case is particularly sensitive since it also involves the interpretation that the relevant regulatory body (Creg) has of the tariffs system. In other work, the team successfully represented Compañía Minera Cerro Tasajero, in the first and second instances, in a dispute arising out of a breach of a port-operation services contract. Clients include Honeywell, OHL, Refinería de Cartagena and Servientrega.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • DO FIDIC RULE APPLY IN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS IN UAE?

    Since a very long time, FIDIC (The International Federation of Consulting Engineers) is commonly used a standard for international construction and engineering contracts and is very frequently used in UAE. It mainly governs the construction works within the country and in GCC. 
  • Communiqué on Equity Crowdfunding Is Officially Published

    By way of background, in January 2019, the Capital Markets Board (“ CMB ”) had issued an announcement on its website on the Draft Communiqué on Equity Crowdfunding [1] . The CMB has now officially published the Communiqué on Crowdfunding No. III-35/A (“ Communiqué ”), on October 3, 2019. The Communiqué entered into force as of October 3, 2019.
  • Beneficial Ownership Concept new interpretation from the Russian federal tax service

    The recent interpretative letter issued by the Russian Federal Tax Services (“FTS”) on 08th August 2019, has provided further guidance as to the application of the Beneficial Ownership Concept, further to the letter initially provided on the 12th of April 2018 which adopted a strict approach of the concept. 
  • Cyprus and Netherlands Double Tax Treaty Update

    Cyprus has concluded the negotiations for the avoidance of double taxation with the Netherlands. The double tax treaty was agreed at technocratic level in Hague. It is expected to be signed by the end of 2019 or early in 2020.
  • Vacancy - Senior Corporate Lawyer

    The Senior Corporate Lawyer, who will be reporting to Partners, will be working with both the firm’s legal team as well as the financial services team. The successful candidate will be requested to show initiative, take on certain responsibilities within the firm, work in a multinational environment and will immediately be given the opportunity to further advance their career within the law firm.
  • CJEU RULED ON THE APPLICATION OF THE BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP CONCEPT

    The judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on February 26, 2019, in the “Danish Beneficial Ownership Cases”, can be perceived as a landmark on the interpretation of the Beneficial Ownership concept under the Interest and Royalties Directive (IRD) and the Parent-Subsidiary Directive (PSD).
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‘centre of life test’ in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of  ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan   [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the “Regulations”). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess  Surinder Singh  cases that appear before them.
  • ITALIAN RULES ON JOINT VENTURES IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AND CONCESSIONS

    Italian rules on jointventures concerning public procurement and concession contracts are set out inlight of the European legal framework provided for in Directive 2014/23/EU and 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. The European rules aim to ensurethe best use of public money so that EU citizens benefit from strategicinvestments and services at fair prices. In this context, public procurementand concessions represent key instruments that need to be regulated and standardisedin order to ensure free movement of goods, freedom of establishment and freedomto provide services.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.