The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

901 NEW YORK AVENUE, NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413, USA
Tel:
Work +1 202 408 4000
Web:
www.finnegan.com

Adriana Burgy, Partner

Adriana Burgy explains how Finnegan’s technological capabilities benefit prosecution clients

What do you see as the main points that differentiate Finnegan from your competitors?

Today, experience, depth of practice, efficiency, quality, and value are all buzzwords in the legal industry.  Clients are looking for their counsel to provide that type of legal service, and our competitors aptly describe themselves as able to provide those types of legal services.  Having those qualities, however, does not set you apart from the crowd. 

Finnegan leads the intellectual property legal market because historically, that is all we have done. Our attorneys speak our clients’ language, our attorneys have worked in our clients’ industries, our attorneys hold advanced degrees in all the major sciences, and our attorneys are experts in their respective fields.  But most of all, I see how we invest in our attorneys. That investment comes in the form of training, mentoring, continuing education, and our firm resources. Our attorneys are as passionate as our clients are about their new inventions/technological advancements. This is what sets Finnegan ahead of its competitors. 

Which practices do you see growing in the next 12 months? What are the drivers behind that?

From a patent prosecution perspective, areas to watch include how the courts and the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) tackle subject matter eligibility. The USPTO will likely continue to roll out programs geared toward its’ quality initiatives and pilot programs, and we will continue to see the effects of the American Invents Act, eg, developing and implementing prosecution strategies with an eye towards insulating granted patents from post-grant proceedings.

Intellectual property continues to be an area that clients look to build and/or solidify their edge in the marketplace. Finnegan services all aspects of intellectual property, including all aspects of patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret law, including counseling, prosecution, licensing, and litigation. We also represent clients on IP issues related to international trade, portfolio management, the Internet, e-commerce, government contracts, antitrust, and unfair competition. In the next 12 months, we will continue to see growth in all of these different aspects of intellectual property as long as companies continue to innovate, compete, and grow.

What’s the main change you’ve made in the firm that will benefit clients?

We innovated our firm’s patent prosecution practice to benefit clients. Taking a 360° look at the way we handle patent prosecution at the firm, we innovated our docketing systems, updated the administrative aspects of patent prosecution, and modernized the internal resources available to those that are involved in patent prosecution. What does this mean for clients? It means our attorneys’ focus remains on the legal, technical, and strategic aspects of patent prosecution, while at the same time meeting the administrative demands of clients today. This translates to our clients by being able to offer big firm resources with a small firm feel.

Is technology changing the way you interact with your clients, and the services you can provide them?

While technology continues to change the way we interact with our clients, as well as the services that we provide them, it is just one part of the picture. From an administrative perspective, technology gives us the ability to manipulate large amounts of data, instantaneously forward court and agency communications to our clients, keep in constant communication with our clients, and provide various platforms to demonstrate our skill set. But, technology cannot be a substitute for a personal call or face-to-face meeting. As technology revolutionaries in the way we conduct business, the bedrock of our firm remains the relationships between our clients and our attorneys. Technology merely serves as a facilitator or a tool in building or growing that relationship.

Can you give us a practical example of how you have helped a client to add value to their business?

Adding value to a clients’ business is one of the best ways to stand out and to really become partners with clients in today’s competitive legal landscape. That is one of our goals at Finnegan, i.e., to become a trusted partner to our clients that can marry their legal and business aspects. For example, as a patent prosecutor, it is not only my job to draft and obtain robust protection for my clients’ inventions, but also to think strategically to position my client favorably in the competitive landscape and for any future challenges (including post-grant proceedings) once a product comes to market. Recently, we were able to obtain patent coverage for an invention that was stuck in prosecution for many years. In view of that patent coverage, our client was able to negotiate a favorable licensing position with one of its competitors.

Are clients looking for stability and strategic direction from their law firms – where do you see the firm in three years time?

Clients come in all different shapes and sizes; their needs are just as diverse. But, stability and strategic direction are two characteristics that may unite all of our clients in what they look for from Finnnegan. In the next three years, Finnegan will continue to have the flexibility to pivot with our clients. Finnegan has and continues to be the world’s leading intellectual property firm. To maintain that position, we will continue to speak our clients’ languages by becoming an integral member of their team that helps them to obtain their business goals through their intellectual property assets.

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • New requirement for all issuers operating on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange

    On 10 August 2017 the Luxembourg Stock Exchange announced that all domestic and foreign issuers operating on the regulated market (Bourse de Luxembourg) or on the multilateral trading facility (Euro MTF) of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange must provide their legal entity identifier (“LEI ”) codes to the Luxembourg Stock Exchange before 15 September 2017.
  • Luxembourg law on the exploration and use of space resources entered into force

    The Luxembourg law on the exploration and use of space resources of 20 July 2017 entered into force on 2 August 2017 and placed Luxembourg among the most innovative space-oriented nations in the world.
  • VAT in the GCC – Q&A updates from the UAE Ministry of Finance

    On 9 July the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Ministry of Finance (MOF) published an update of the Value Added Tax (VAT) FAQ section of its website.
  • PRIIPs KID: The final pieces of the puzzle

    The pieces of the puzzle are finally falling into place. The long-awaited level 3 and 4 measures have been published earlier this week, half a year before the PRIIPs KID becomes compulsory.
  • MiFID II: Further guidance on product governance requirements

    Amongst the numerous topics covered by the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II), the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has decided to provide further guidance on the requirements regarding product governance through its guidelines dated 2 June 2017 which focus on the target market assessment by manufacturers and distributors of financial products.     
  • Arendt & Medernach is again the “Luxembourg Tax Firm of the Year”

    The partners of Arendt & Medernach are pleased to announce that their firm has been awarded once again the prestigious “Luxembourg Tax Firm of the Year” title during the International Tax Review’s European Tax Awards ceremony held at the Savoy Hotel in London on 18 May.
  • Signature of the Multilateral instrument – reservations made by Luxembourg

    On 7 June 2017, the official ceremony for the signing of the multilateral instrument (“MLI”) took place bringing to a close a process initiated last year when a consensus was reached on the wording of the MLI on 24 November 2016 (see also our newsflash dated 2 December 2016, available on our website www.arendt.com section Publications/Newsflash).
  • Arendt & Medernach: Luxembourg Law Firm of the Year

    Luxembourg, May 2017 – Arendt & Medernach is proud to have been named “Luxembourg Law firm of the year” both by Chambers & Partners and IFLR (International Financial Law Review). The prestigious trophies were both received in April in London at the respective ceremonies of the Chambers Europe Awards 2017 and the IFLR European Awards 2017.
  • First VAT EU case law on the cost-sharing VAT exemption

    The question of the scope of the cost-sharing VAT exemption, also referred to in the Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 as amended ("EU VAT Directive") as “Independent Groups of Persons” or “IGPs”, is currently being debated at the Court of Justice of the EU (“CJEU”) in several cases. Last Thursday marked the first milestone regarding this specific VAT exemption since the CJEU released its judgment in the case Commission v Luxembourg (C-274/15).
  • An Introduction to Corporate Guarantee

    In the UAE, the risk management activities inherent in running a corporate or investment banking business remain of crucial importance, not least because of the strong local characteristic of “name lending”, by which is meant lending or providing other banking facilities to family or other private businesses, primarily on the strength of the “name” or “names” of the proprietors standing behind the business, rather than on the strength of the asset quality and underlying credit of the particular business. Of course, in practice, there is commercial overlap between the proprietors and the companies which they own, but the credit analyses can break down where poor banking practices and procedures result in poorly constructed legal documentation and gaps in guarantee and security support documents.