The Legal 500

Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP

WORLDWIDE PLAZA, 825 EIGHTH AVENUE, NEW YORK, NY 10019-7475, USA
Tel:
Work +1 212 474 1000
Fax:
Fax +1 212 474 3700
Web:
www.cravath.com
Email:
New York, London

Richard Clary

Tel:
Work (212) 474-1227
Email:
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP

Work Department

Litigation.

Position

Richard W. Clary is a partner in Cravath’s Litigation Department, and until recently, the Firm’s Head of Litigation. His cases have included securities defense for numerous financial institutions and for IBM; antitrust defense for Lucent and IBM; biotech patent litigation (on both the plaintiff and defense sides) for Schering AG and Berlex; telephony and semiconductor patent litigation (on both the plaintiff and defense sides) for Lucent; patent and antitrust litigation (at both the trial and appellate levels) for Paragon Trade Brands; bankruptcy litigation for Chase and Credit Suisse; trade secret, trademark and patent litigation for IBM; and appellate litigation for Qualcomm and INEOS. Mr. Clary has also handled antitrust and trade secret litigation for INEOS.

Mr. Clary has extensive district court and appellate experience; he has also handled both international and domestic arbitrations.

Mr. Clary was lead counsel for Credit Suisse in all its Enron-related civil litigation in Federal, state and bankruptcy courts. He argued on behalf of Credit Suisse the successful appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, reversing class certification in the $40 billion Enron Federal class action litigation. The Fifth Circuit ruled that Credit Suisse and other banks had no fiduciary obligation to Enron’s shareholders, had no duty of disclosure, had made no misrepresentations to Enron’s shareholders, and had not committed any conduct that rose to the level of a primary violation of the securities laws. The District Court subsequently granted summary judgment for Credit Suisse. Mr. Clary also successfully defended various financial institutions in securities litigation relating to Dynegy, El Paso and Anchor Glass. He currently represents the outside directors of Citigroup in connection with subprime-related litigation. He represented Credit Suisse and Deutsche Bank in litigation regarding the Hexion/Huntsman merger in Delaware, Texas and New York. Mr. Clary recently successfully defended Credit Suisse in a securities class action relating to collateralized debt obligations, and he is currently lead counsel for Credit Suisse in defense of actions relating to residential mortgage-backed securities.

Career

After a clerkship with Hon. Walter R. Mansfield of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and a clerkship with Hon. Thurgood Marshall of the U.S. Supreme Court, Mr. Clary joined Cravath in 1980 and became a partner in 1985. Mr. Clary served as the Firm’s Litigation Managing Partner from February 1997 to November 2005, and as Head of Litigation from November 2005 to September 2010.

Mr. Clary was cited as being one of the country’s leading practitioners in securities litigation by Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business from 2007 through 2011. He was also recognized by that publication as a leading trial lawyer in 2010 and 2011, and by Chambers Global in 2011 and 2012. From 2009 through 2012, The Best Lawyers in America named Mr. Clary a leader in commercial litigation and “Bet-the-Company” litigation and in 2011 and 2012, also named him a leader in banking and finance litigation and securities litigation. In addition, he was named to Lawdragon’s list of “100 Lawyers You Need to Know in Securities Litigation” in 2008, and has been recognized by Lawdragon as one of 500 leading lawyers in America from 2006 through 2011. Mr. Clary was recognized by Benchmark Litigation from 2009 through 2012 as one of the “Local Litigation Stars” for the New York area. From 2010 through 2012, he was recognized by the same publication as a “National Star” for his work in securities litigation, and in 2011 and 2012, he also was recognized as a “National Star” for his work in general commercial litigation. Since 2008, Mr. Clary has been named a leader in securities litigation by the U.S. edition of The Legal 500. He was also named by the publication as a Leading Trial Lawyer in 2011, after having been recognized the year before as “One to Watch” in that category. Mr. Clary was also noted for his appellate work by The Legal 500 in 2011. Mr. Clary was a finalist for The Chambers USA Awards for Excellence 2008 “Litigation: Business Trial Lawyers” award. In 2010, Mr. Clary was named by Law360 as one of the “10 Most Admired Securities Attorneys” based on nominations from Law360 readers and practice group heads at the 100 largest U.S. law firms.

Mr. Clary is a Lecturer of Law at Harvard Law School, where he teaches a course on Complex Litigation.

Member

Mr. Clary is a member of the Litigation and the Intellectual Property Sections of the American Bar Association, has served on both the Antitrust Committee and the Patent Committee of the Association of the Bar of The City of New York and is on the Lawyers Committee for the National Center for State Courts. He is also Vice President of the Association of the Bar of The City of New York. Mr. Clary recently completed nine years on the Board of the Legal Aid Society, where he was a Vice Chair of the Board and on its Executive and Strategic Planning Committees, and now serves on the Board of Advisors. Mr. Clary also serves on the Board of Trustees of Mystic Seaport and just ended six years on the Board of Trustees of the Rye Country Day School (2005-2011). Mr. Clary has twice received the Distinguished Service Award from Amherst College, and has received five Outstanding Pro Bono Service Awards from Legal Aid.

Mr. Clary chairs the Practising Law Institute’s annual “Managing Complex Litigation” conference, which he created in 2006. As part of that conference, Mr. Clary has led panel discussions on “Creative Tools for Streamlining the Litigation Process,” “Creative Tools for Managing Complex Litigation,” “Issues Concerning Resolving Complex Litigation,” “Controlling Opt-Outs and Coordinated Cases” and “Crafting a Settlement Agreement,” and he has written on those topics for PLI.

In June 2008, Mr. Clary spoke at “The Role of Courts in Defining the Social Contract: A Case Study of Socio-Economic Rights,” a program sponsored by the Foundation for Law, Justice and Society in association with the Centre for Socio-Legal Studies at the University of Oxford. Mr. Clary’s policy brief, “A Discussion of the ‘Homeless Families with Children’ Litigation as a Case Study of the Issues That Arise When a Court Defines and Enforces the Right to Shelter,” was published by the Foundation in the fall of 2008.

Education

Mr. Clary received a B.A. magna cum laude from Amherst College in 1975, where he was elected to Phi Beta Kappa, and a J.D. magna cum laude from Harvard Law School in 1978, where he was Developments Officer of the Law Review and awarded the Sears Prize.

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Jersey Royal Court considers measure of damages for dilapidations claims

    In the absence of any statutory provision in Jersey addressing how dilapidations claims are to be quantified, the Royal Court's decision in JSSL v Barclays has provided some much needed guidance, particularly in circumstances where there is an acceptance that works to redress dilapidations have not been and will not be carried out.
  • English Supreme Court rules on Mistake and Hastings Bass

    On 9 May 2013 the English Supreme Court handed down a unanimous judgment on the seminal cases of Pitt-v- Holt and Futter -v- Futter , with Lord Walker's valedictory judgment conclusively resolving the English position on the rule in Hastings Bass and rescission on the ground of mistake.
  • Getting the breaks

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • Product liability and dietary supplements

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • The calm before 
the storm: are 
you prepared for 
a dawn raid?

    WilmerHale currently authors the Fraud and Corporate Crime section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • International shipment of waste: transporters beware

    Burges Salmon LLP currently authors the Environment and Energy section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here
  • Cyprus Shipping Industry : Business as usual. Why despite recent events Cyprus remains an internatio

    Cyprus is the third most populated island in the Mediterranean Sea. It is strategically located at the crossroads of Europe, Africa and the Middle East. Traditionally Cyprus has always been at the heart of the seafaring trade and therefore always functioned as an important centre for trade and commerce. Today as a member of the European Union it remains an optimal business base. It is one of the most attractive locations for foreign investments worldwide. Foreign companies have been given the opportunity to invest and establish business in Cyprus on equal terms with local investors as no distinction is made between foreign and Cypriot companies.
  • FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

    The excellent support system in combination with the ideal jurisdiction provided in Cyprus set the country in the list of the most desirable countries through which you can offer foreign exchange operations. In addition, the accession of Cyprus within the European Union and, most importantly, the extremely beneficial economic advantages available due to the low costs and the outstanding taxation, create a covetable environment for foreign investors.
  • National public order. Adoption of the Draft

    The Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation (hereinafter - SCC RF) adopted by the Informative Letter No. 156 dated the 26th of February, 2013 (hereinafter - the Informative Letter) on Review of the consideration by arbitrazh courts of the cases on the implementation of the public order clause as the ground for rejection of the recognition and enforcement of the foreign court decisions and arbitral awards.
  • China Customs New Interpretation

    For many products, tariff classification can be technically complex, confusing, and subject to multiple interpretations. Often several different Harmonized System Codes ("HS Code") may seem applicable for one given product with different tariff rates. Tariff classification is indeed a process of application of customs classification rules, including customs rulings and decisions, and misclassification may trigger severe legal consequences. The sad fact is, unfortunately, that many companies rely on non-legal professionals to determine the HS Codes for imports or exports. A recent interpretation issued by the General Administration of Customs of China ("GACC") (Circular No. [2012] 495 Shu-Fa-Fa) (the "Interpretation") reinforces the process of tariff classification as a legal matter, and formulates the test as to what counts for regulatory violation if tariff classification rules are improperly applied by the importer or exporter in a given case. If the legal defense is successful, misclassification may only be treated as a non-violation misclassification, with the possible obligation to pay up additional customs duties, if any, but without administrative or criminal consequences. The Interpretation took effect as from February 1, 2013.