The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP

WORLDWIDE PLAZA, 825 EIGHTH AVENUE, NEW YORK, NY 10019-7475, USA
Tel:
Work +1 212 474 1000
Fax:
Fax +1 212 474 3700
Email:
Web:
www.cravath.com
London, New York

Peter Barbur

Tel:
Work (212) 474-1058
Email:
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP

Work Department

Litigation.

Position

Peter T. Barbur is a partner in Cravath’s Litigation Department. He handles a wide variety of antitrust, intellectual property and securities litigation, as well as internal corporate investigations, antitrust-related government investigations, international arbitrations and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act matters.

Mr. Barbur currently represents American Express (“AmEx”) in several antitrust litigations in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, including a civil action brought by the Department of Justice and 17 state attorneys general that was tried over six weeks in 2014. The action concerns AmEx’s nondiscrimination provisions in its merchant agreements and is one of the largest and most significant cases brought by the government under Section 1 of the Sherman Act in over a decade. He also represented AmEx and certain of its directors and officers in a shareholder derivative suit arising from the DOJ’s enforcement action; defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint was granted with prejudice. Mr. Barbur also represents AmEx in a series of putative class actions and individual lawsuits brought by large supermarket and pharmacy chains alleging that AmEx’s “anti-steering” rules violate Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and in a putative class action brought on behalf of all U.S. merchants alleging that AmEx improperly tied acceptance of certain of its card products to acceptance of other AmEx card products. Mr. Barbur represented AmEx in another putative class action alleging unlawful tying that was dismissed after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2013 that the company’s arbitration provisions in its merchant agreements, which contained a class action waiver, were valid and enforceable.

Mr. Barbur represented Viacom International and Black Entertainment Television in a lawsuit brought by Cablevision the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that Viacom’s 2012 licensing agreement with Cablevision constituted illegal tying and block-booking in violation of the Sherman Act and New York’s Donnelly Act.

In addition to his antitrust work, Mr. Barbur is representing IBM in a DOJ FCPA investigation relating to IBM’s operations in Poland, Argentina, Bangladesh and Ukraine. He represented IBM in an investigation by the SEC relating to IBM’s operations in China and Korea, which settled.

Mr. Barbur has represented Time Warner in a number of matters, including in connection with the government investigations and private securities litigation concerning financial reporting and disclosure issues arising out of Time Warner’s merger with America Online in 2000.

Mr. Barbur also represented a special committee appointed by the Eli Lilly Board of Directors to respond to shareholder derivative demands and lawsuits relating to the marketing of Zyprexa.

Career

Following his graduation from law school, Mr. Barbur served as a law clerk to Hon. Hugh H. Bownes of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. He joined Cravath as a litigation associate in 1988 and became a partner in 1994.

From 2013 through 2016, Mr. Barbur was named a “National Star” in antitrust litigation and a “Local Litigation Star” in the New York area by Benchmark Litigation. He was also recognized as a leader in antitrust litigation by the 2015 and 2016 editions of The Best Lawyers in America. Mr. Barbur has been recognized for his antitrust and patent work by The Legal 500 United States and was selected by Lawdragon from 2012 through 2016 as one of 500 Leading Lawyers in America.

Member

Mr. Barbur is a member of the Board of Trustees of the Aperture Foundation and a member of the Photography Council at the Museum of Modern Art.

Education

Mr. Barbur received his B.A. magna cum laude from Dartmouth College in 1983, where he was elected to Phi Beta Kappa, and his J.D. cum laude from New York University School of Law in 1987, where he was Articles Editor of the Law Review, a Root‑Tilden Scholar, and elected to the Order of the Coif.


United States: Antitrust

Civil litigation/class actions

Within: Civil litigation/class actions

Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLPcombines a quick and thorough grasp of clients’ issues with the ability to communicate simply, clearly and completely’. The team is particularly active in financial services litigation and American Express is a key client in this regard. Evan Chesler, Peter Barbur and Kevin Orsini advised the credit card company in a number of disputes, including its appeal of a district court judgment in a case brought by the DOJ and 17 state attorneys general alleging that the merchant acceptance rules imposed by American Express violated the Sherman Act. The pharmaceutical sector is another regular source of work, and Chesler, Rowan Wilson* and David Marriott represented Mylan in its long-running set of lawsuits alleging pay-for-delay agreements with Cephalon relating to the Provigil drug. Qualcomm and Thai Airways are also recent clients. All the lawyers named above are based in the firm’s New York office. *Since publication, Rowan Wilson has been confirmed as an Associate Judge of the New York State Court of Appeals.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Innovation & Thailand 4.0: Value Creation for Business using Trade Secrets

    Thailand 4.0 stands for the new stage to transform the country currently relying on heavy industries (3.0 stage) into a creativity and innovation-driven economy. Trade secrets are definitively value-based and could help pursing Thailand 4.0.
  • Novelties Introduced by the Movable Pledge Law

    As of January 1, 2017, Law No. 6750 on Pledge over Movable Assets in Commercial Transactions (“Movable Pledge Law “), which was enacted on October 20, 2016, entered into force and abolished Law No.1447 on Commercial Enterprise Pledge (“Commercial Enterprise Pledge Law “). The Movable Pledge Law introduces significant changes and offers more practical methods for establishing pledge over movable assets as explained below.
  • Determination of Injury in Anti-Dumping Investigations: Turkey’s Side of the Story

    I - Introduction
  • Tax evasion: Only voluntary disclosure affords protection from severe penalties

    Anyone who has been caught for tax evasion should expect to be faced with severe penalties. Voluntary disclosure is the only way of returning to a state of normal tax affairs and avoiding penalties.
  • Turkish Health PPP Projects

    The Turkish health sector has undergone major reforms over the past ten years as part of the health transformation program. The most important pillar of such program has been the development of public-private partnership (“PPP ”) model health campus projects. More than twenty health campus projects with an investment amount of more than € 10 billion have been developed through PPP model in Turkey. They are currently at different stages ranging from tendering to operation, and more than ten health PPP projects are still in the pipeline.
  • Infrastructure REIC: An Alternative Source of Funding for Infrastructure Projects

    With the start of operation in certain BOT and other PPP model infrastructure projects in Turkey, refinancing alternatives have become more attractive and diversified. Capital market instruments and institutions are likely to have a greater share in the refinancings of projects which have become operational and the construction risks have been removed. Over the last few years, the use of capital market instruments in the infrastructure financings have gained a new impetus with the introduction of various incentives and financing solutions in this aspect. Most recently, the removal of the 1/3 and 1/5 bond issuance limits for healthcare PPP projects on 18 February 2017 represented an important step towards incentivizing the use of bonds in the healthcare sector. In line with this overall strategy, the government has also adopted various measures to make the Real Estate Investment Companies (“REICs ”) more attractive for the financing/refinancing of infrastructure projects such as BOT, BLT and other PPP projects.
  • Ankara-Niğde Highway Project

    Tender process for 330 km Ankara-Niğde Highway Project has been launched by the General Directorate of Highways upon publication of the tender announcement in the Official Gazette on December 30, 2016.
  • Establishment of the Natural Gas Spot Market in Turkey

    In line with the government’s objectives to make Turkey a regional hub for natural gas trading, a natural gas spot market has been established by the Natural Gas Organized Wholesale Market Regulation published in the Official Gazette on 31 March 2017.
  • Philippine Court of Appeals Denies Issuance of Environmental Protection Order Against Mining Company

    In a decision issued on March 8, 2017, the Philippine Court of Appeals (CA) denied the petition by NGO Ang Aroroy ay Alagaan, Inc. and certain individuals, for the issuance of a writ of kalikasan against Filminera Resources Corporation, and its directors and officers. The petitioners have claimed that Filminera, which operates in the Philippine province of Masbate, had been causing environmental damage in the conduct of its mining operations in violation of local law, and that a writ of kalikasan should be issued.
  • LIS ALIBI PENDENS UNDER THE COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) NO 44/2001 ON JURISDICTIONAND THE RECOGNITION AN

    Lis Alibi pendens is Latin for ‘suit pending elsewhere .’ Both Articles 27 and 28 of the EU Regulation 44/2001 regulate the existence of lis alibi pendens and related judicial actions. In particular it is a doctrine that regulates the jurisdictional relationship of courts hearing concurrent proceedings involving the same or related causes of action between the same parties pending in the courts of different Member States.