The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Machado Meyer Sendacz e Opice Advogados

Work +55 11 3150 7000

Renata Martins de Oliveira Amado

Work 55 11 3150-7056
Machado Meyer Sendacz e Opice Advogados

Work Department

Restructuring and insolvency / Crisis management / Litigation, arbitration and dispute resolution/ Financial services




Specialist in disputes prevention and resolution before the Judiciary, public agencies and reputed national and international Arbitration Centres, and restructuring and recovery of credit and companies. Works in disputes concerning Bankruptcy Law, Administrative Law, Civil Law, Commercial Law, Environmental Law, Mining Law, Consumer’s Law, Aviation Law, Banking Law, Real Estate Law, Corporate Law and issues related to compliance. Also provides legal assistance to players involved in processes of debt restructuring, companies recovery or bankruptcy, and provides assistance to companies in economical and financial difficulties, to creditors or to third parties interested in the acquisition of assets or in granting financing to such organizations. Has previous experience in areas of knowledge such as automotive, banking, electronics, energy, telecommunications, pharmaceutical, chemical, services, retail, steelmaking, mining and food.


Portuguese and English.


Admitted to the Brazilian Bar Association. Member of International Bar Association. Member of Brazilian Arbitration Committee ICDR Young & International


Received her LL.B. and post-graduate degree in Civil Procedural law from Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo. Also continuing education in credit recovery and debt restructuring at Fundação Getulio Vargas and continuing education in US Private Law and Foundations of Conflict Dispute Resolution at New York University.


Bankruptcy and restructuring

Within: Bankruptcy and restructuring

Machado Meyer Sendacz e Opice Advogados has established a strong restructuring team, drawing particularly on the expertise and experience of key partners Renata Martins de Oliveira Amado and Renato Gomes Ribeiro Maggio. It covers the gamut of in- and out-of-court restructurings and distressed deals, and the firm’s multidisciplinary capabilities allow it to staff cases with restructuring, corporate, banking and other sector specialists. In significant work, Gomes Ribeiro Maggio and Camilo Torres Gerosa Gomes acted for creditors Itaú Unibanco, Banco Santander (Brasil) and Banco Bradesco in the pre-packaged reorganisation plan of Máquina de Vendas.

[back to top]

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Communiqué on Equity Crowdfunding Is Officially Published

    By way of background, in January 2019, the Capital Markets Board (“ CMB ”) had issued an announcement on its website on the Draft Communiqué on Equity Crowdfunding [1] . The CMB has now officially published the Communiqué on Crowdfunding No. III-35/A (“ Communiqué ”), on October 3, 2019. The Communiqué entered into force as of October 3, 2019.
  • Beneficial Ownership Concept new interpretation from the Russian federal tax service

    The recent interpretative letter issued by the Russian Federal Tax Services (“FTS”) on 08th August 2019, has provided further guidance as to the application of the Beneficial Ownership Concept, further to the letter initially provided on the 12th of April 2018 which adopted a strict approach of the concept. 
  • Cyprus and Netherlands Double Tax Treaty Update

    Cyprus has concluded the negotiations for the avoidance of double taxation with the Netherlands. The double tax treaty was agreed at technocratic level in Hague. It is expected to be signed by the end of 2019 or early in 2020.
  • Vacancy - Senior Corporate Lawyer

    The Senior Corporate Lawyer, who will be reporting to Partners, will be working with both the firm’s legal team as well as the financial services team. The successful candidate will be requested to show initiative, take on certain responsibilities within the firm, work in a multinational environment and will immediately be given the opportunity to further advance their career within the law firm.

    The judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on February 26, 2019, in the “Danish Beneficial Ownership Cases”, can be perceived as a landmark on the interpretation of the Beneficial Ownership concept under the Interest and Royalties Directive (IRD) and the Parent-Subsidiary Directive (PSD).
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‘centre of life test’ in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of  ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan   [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the “Regulations”). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess  Surinder Singh  cases that appear before them.

    Italian rules on jointventures concerning public procurement and concession contracts are set out inlight of the European legal framework provided for in Directive 2014/23/EU and 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. The European rules aim to ensurethe best use of public money so that EU citizens benefit from strategicinvestments and services at fair prices. In this context, public procurementand concessions represent key instruments that need to be regulated and standardisedin order to ensure free movement of goods, freedom of establishment and freedomto provide services.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a  sole representative visa  is not “a  majority shareholder in the overseas business”.