The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon
CHEAPSIDE HOUSE, 138 CHEAPSIDE, LONDON, EC2V 6BJ, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7600 8080
Email:
Web:
www.kemplittle.com

The firm

Kemp Little is one of the UK's leading technology law firms; we began as purely IT lawyers and technology has remained our core focus ever since. Because technology is at the heart of everything we do, our lawyers are exposed to the nuances of technology- driven business on a daily basis.

As a specialist technology legal services firm we act for sector-leading organisations across a range of technology, digital media and communications industries and in sectors where technology is fundamental to an organisation's operations and success. Our focus on providing practical business solutions to our clients means that we increasingly involve non-legal business consultants and specialist technology, some of which we have built in-house, to deliver results.

Our clients range from global technology and digitally-focussed businesses (including over 20 in the FTSE 100/250 and Global Fortune 500) to fast-growth venture backed companies and owner-managed businesses. Whilst each client has specific needs and goals, they come to us for the same thing: unrivalled sector knowledge and legal excellence.

Established in 1997, we deliver expert legal advice in a pragmatic, responsive and cost-effective way via our technology-focussed practice areas:

  • Commercial Technology (including Sourcing, Cybersecurity and Fintech)
  • Corporate (including Venture Capital, M&A, Private Equity and Tax)
  • Data Protection & Privacy
  • Employment & Immigration
  • Financial Regulation
  • Intellectual Property
  • Technology Disputes

We achieve this by:

  • Focusing on our industry specialisms
  • Investing time to understand our clients‚Äô business needs and objectives, applying this knowledge to the work that we do and the advice we give
  • Building long-term, enduring client relationships
  • Offering highly competitive rates
  • Right-sizing our teams to our clients‚Äô specific project, using the most appropriate blend of senior and junior resource

Our particular niche expertise means that not only do technology and digitally-based businesses see us as their go-to firm, but so too do businesses for whom technology is key in sectors such as professional services, financial services, retail, travel and healthcare.

  • Number of UK partners: 25
  • Number of other UK fee-earners: 65
  • Breakdown of work %
  • ‚Ä©
  • Commercial Technology: 9
  • IP & Technology Disputes: 5
  • Corporate: 3
  • Employment: 3

‚Ä©

Above material supplied by Kemp Little LLP.

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‚Äėcentre of life test‚Äô in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of¬† ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan ¬† [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the ‚ÄúRegulations‚ÄĚ). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess ¬†Surinder Singh ¬†cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a¬† sole representative visa ¬†is not ‚Äúa¬† majority shareholder in the overseas business‚ÄĚ.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has ¬†‚Äėpreviously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules‚Äô,¬† the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11).¬†
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 
  • PARALLEL PROCEEDINGS ‚Äď CIVIL AND CRIMINAL

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (‚Äúthe 2014 Act‚ÄĚ) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal.¬†The¬† explanatory notes ¬†to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the¬† Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 ¬†(‚Äúthe 2002 Act‚ÄĚ). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.