The Legal 500

Work 020 7600 8080
Fax 020 7600 8080


Top-tier recommendations


London: Corporate and commercial

Within Commercial contracts, tier 4

Kemp Little LLP is raising its profile and demonstrating ‘thorough knowledge' in this area. Commercial contracts is a key focus across the firm, which acts for clients such as Burberry and Ernst and Young. It is advising the latter on its sponsorship of the 2014 Ryder Cup as well as individual golfers. Calum Murray and Andrew Joint are both highly experienced. The firm launched its consultancy business Kemp Little Consulting in 2013.

[back to top]

Within M&A: smaller deals, up to £50m, Kemp Little LLP is a first tier firm,

Recognised for its ‘good M&A capabilities for smaller deals', Kemp Little LLP specialises in technology and digital media, where its clients include FTSE 100 and Fortune 100 companies. Charles Claisse, Andy Moseby and Glafkos Tombolis are the names to note.

[back to top]

Within Venture capital, tier 6

Venture Capital mandates account for a fair proportion of boutique technology and digital media firm Kemp Little LLP’s instructions. Andy Moseby advised - a hotel metasearch website - on the UK aspects of the $8m investment in it by a group of investors including Balderton Capital and Accel Partners. Team head Charles Claisse is recommended.

[back to top]

London: Human resources

Within Employment: employers and senior executives, tier 7

David Williams leads the team at Kemp Little LLP, which has a particular focus representing clients in the technology sector. Work includes employment litigation and outsourcing issues, and the firm has seen an increase in instructions on matters involving online defamation by former employees.

[back to top]

London: TMT (technology, media and telecoms)

Within Intellectual property, tier 5

Kemp Little LLP acts for technology sector clients in IP litigation and licensing matters, and has recently advised Ikon Science and SITA. Rebecca Halford-Harrison is the key contact.

[back to top]

Within IT and telecoms, Kemp Little LLP is a second tier firm,

Kemp Little LLP has recently advised on transactional, procurement and contractual matters for clients such as Accenture, EuroMTS, Morgan Stanley and Reckitt Benckiser. The ‘extremely commercial' Calum Murray heads the practice, with Paul O’Hare advising on outsourcings. Andrew Joint focuses on transactional work, and Paul Hinton has expertise in relation to trading platforms. Name partner Richard Kemp left in May 2014 to set up Kemp IT Law.

[back to top]

Within Media and entertainment, Kemp Little LLP is a second tier firm,

Kemp Little LLP provides ‘a very high overall level of service' and its lawyers ‘are very responsive and have great commercial insight'. The firm specialises in digital media and entertainment, and its clients include Thomson Reuters, Activision Blizzard and Buzzfeed. Calum Murray, who leads the team, ‘understands issues immediately, and is a very good sounding board'. Andy Moseby‘has a sensible approach and is a very likeable guy'. Other key members of the team include Paul O’Hare and Paul Garland.

[back to top]

London: Transport

Within Travel, Kemp Little LLP is a third tier firm,

Kemp Little LLP is noted for TMT expertise for travel industry clients such as Expedia, Japan Airlines International, SITA and Calum Murray, who is ‘quick to respond and extremely commercial in his advice', heads the team.

[back to top]

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Finding the 
right words

    In the recent case of Newbury v Sun Microsystems [2013], the defendant argued that an offer to settle proceedings was ‘in principle' only and that a binding contract could not be formed until further terms had been agreed and a formal contract had been signed. It supported this argument by referring to a statement, in the offer letter, that the settlement was to be ‘recorded in a suitably worded agreement'. 

  • Behind the corporate veil: is that all there is?

    That companies have an existence entirely separate to that of their shareholders and directors is a foundational principle of English law and commerce.

  • Restoring environmental damage: putting a price on ecosystem services

    On 7 August 2009 a 40-inch pipeline ruptured, spilling 5,400 cubic metres of crude oil into the soil and groundwater of La Crau nature reserve in southern France, a habitat protected under French and European law. The operator had to excavate and replace 60,000 tons of soil, install 70 wells to pump and treat groundwater and 25 pumps to skim oil from surface water, at a cost in the region of €50m. However, this was just the primary remediation (that is, restoring the site to the state it would have been if the damage had not occurred). The operator was also required to compensate for the damage to the habitats and the loss of the ecosystem services that would otherwise have been provided by La Crau nature reserve. Measures included purchasing land outside of the nature reserve and contributing to its management for a period of 30 years (over €1m), monitoring the water table for 20 years (over €500,000), monitoring fauna over three years (€150,000) and rehabilitation in accordance with best available ecological techniques (nearly €2m). Overall, the compensatory restoration (to compensate for the amount of time that the ecosystem was impacted) and complimentary restoration (to compensate for elements of the ecosystem that had been permanently lost) came to more than €6.5m. 

  • The role of arbitrators in EU antitrust law

    In May 2014, it will be ten years since Regulation No 1/2003 entered into force. When the legislator of the European Union adopted this Regulation on 16 December 2002, its main objective was to decentralise the enforcement of the two main provisions of EU antitrust law, Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (now Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)). Where do the arbitrators fit in this picture?

  • New Immigration Bill, October 2013: cause for concern or appeasing public sentiment?

    The year 2013 has seen a string of reforms to the immigration system by the current coalition government. On 10 October, the government published a Bill aimed at continuing its drive to reduce net migration figures. 

  • New Schengen EU Regulations: impact on short-stay visa visitors

    The publication on 26 June 2013 of the European Union Regulation EU 610/2013 modified the incumbent Regulation EU 562/2006 in relation to third country nationals (ie non-EU citizens) and those travelling on a short-stay visitor visa, as well as those who do not require a visa to enter the Schengen area, Romania, Croatia and Bulgaria. Exceptions include EU and EEA nationals travelling to other EU/EEA states within the Schengen area together with foreign nationals holding either long-stay or residence permits for their destination Schengen countries.

  • New revised guidelines for administrators in pre-pack sales

    Pre-pack sales by administrators are now used frequently enough for most people in business to be aware of them and many have come across them in their business lives. A small amount of controversy still attaches to pre-packs, but it is probably right to say that they are now an accepted part of the UK business scene as a useful means of rescuing a business in difficulty and preserving some or all of the jobs connected with the business.
    - Druces
  • Silence is not always golden

    In PGF II SA v OMFS Company 1 Ltd [2013], the Court of Appeal considered, for the first time, whether a failure by a party to respond to an invitation to mediate should be treated as an unreasonable refusal to mediate - previous cases having focused on situations where there had been an express refusal to do so. 

  • Continued uncertainty for international manufacturers in the US

    For manufacturers that export, a key strategic issue for in-house counsel is assessing the risk of being sued in another jurisdiction - particularly the US. 

  • Parking rights: here to stay? Consent might be the surprising answer 

    In the field of the acquisition of easements by prescription, little has caused more consternation over the last decade or so than the question of whether a right to park cars can be acquired by twenty years user as of right. The types of property capable of being adversely affected range from individual residential units all the way up to major development sites. The establishment of such a right can have a devastating impact on the value of the burdened land.