The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon
3A BLACKSTOCK ROAD, FINSBURY PARK, LONDON, N4 2JF, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 8800 6464
Fax:
Fax 020 8800 6066
DX:
57470 FINSBURY PARK
Email:
Web:
www.johnfordsolicitors.co.uk

Marian Shaughnessy

Tel:
Work 020 8800 6464
Email:
John Ford Solicitors

Work Department

Head of community care.

Position

Marian Shaughnessy has over 14 years experience in community care and education law and over 20 years experience in public law. Qualifying in 1990, Marian joined John Ford Solicitors in 2003. She has a wealth of experience representing clients and regularly undertakes judicial reviews of local authorities in respect of community care and education decisions. She also represents clients in claims for disability discrimination. Marian has acted in the court of protection for a number of family members of vulnerable adults. Marian has also represented clients wishing to challenge the contents of their Disclosure and Barring (DBS) and Enhanced DBS certificates and represented the claimant in the leading case of R (L) v The Metropolitan Police Commissioner, which went to the Supreme Court. Areas of Specialism: Community care, education law, public and administrative law, court of protection, discrimination and human rights. Important cases: P & W v LB Hackney [2014] This Judicial Review resulted in the Local Authority agreeing to remove its limit on disabled adults’ entitlement to overnight respite; R(ES) v LB Hillingdon [2013] Marian represented the vulnerable person in the court of protection and judicial review proceedings which resulted in the Local Authority contributing to the costs of the person’s residential college placement; R(HM) v Medway [2012] Marian successfully challenged the Local Authority’s decision to cut a disabled adult’s care package; R(KM) v Hertfordshire County Council [2012] Marian represented a child in a judicial review of the Local Authority’s decision not to fund nursery care and successfully obtained funding; B v LB Islington [2011] In this judicial review the Local Authority agreed to fund a private residential school place for Marian’s client with a statement of special educational needs (SEN); R(S) v LB Hillingdon [2010] Marian represented a child who was out of school and obtained home tuition from the Local Authority; R (L) v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [2009] UKHL3 Marian represented the claimant. The Supreme Court substantially altered the interpretation of the law that requires the police to disclose information for the purposes of enhanced criminal record certificates, holding that the law as currently interpreted did not comply with the rights to respect for private life. As a result the procedures adopted by the police have had to be amended to take into account the findings of the court in this case; AB v LB Barnet [2009] – Community Care Law Reports This case concerned the application of s.20 of the Children Act 1989 – the duty of the Local Authority to accommodate children where parents are unable to do so.

Career

Trained TV Edwards and Islington Council; qualified 1990; solicitor (housing and environmental health) LB Islington; advisory centre for education (ACE); Levenes (education) 2002-03; John Ford Solicitors 2003-to date.

Member

Education Law Association.


London: Public sector

Education: individuals

Within: Education: individuals

John Ford Solicitors’ ‘knowledgeable’ team has ‘a wealth of experience’. It recently acted in judicial review proceedings pertaining to the failure to comply with an EHC plan under the Children and Families Act 2014. The ‘pragmaticKaren May acts for individuals in judicial review cases, particularly at the interface between education and community care law. Also recommended are John Ford, who has ‘an excellent legal brain’, and ‘sharp and resourceful’ associates Marian Shaughnessy and Helen Gill.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments in London

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • The legal difference between a consultant and an employee according to Nicaraguan Law

    Knowing the legal difference between a consultant and an employee is important for a company that needs to hire someone in Nicaragua or for a person interested in rendering services for a company or another person, due to the fact that the nature of the contractual relationship will determine many factors that both parties must be aware of before executing the contracting modality that will govern the relationship between them - the nature of the contractual relationship impacts on the employment benefits, tax implications and liabilities that the parties must comply with according to the law.  labor_law_in_nicaragua
  • Single director - shareholder Companies according to the Nicaraguan legal system

    What is a Single Shareholder and Director legal entity?
  • Business in Nicaragua- The Most Important Changes in the Recent Tax Reform

    In recent years, the country ́s the government has been committed to improving Taxation in Nicaragua and attempting to follow the legislative model used by some of the other countries in the region. Starting January 1st, 2013, a new tax law (Law No. 822, Tax Concertation Law) came into force in and completely changed the taxation system in Nicaragua. Two years later a new law was issued by the National Assembly containing more than 80 amendments, additions and repeals (Law No 891) which came into force December 18th, 2014.