The Legal 500

HBJ Claim Solutions LLP

Work 0141 249 6199

The firm traces its roots back to 1808, when Mr Boyd set up a legal practice in Edinburgh specialising in maritime law. The firm is a top-50 UK firm and continues to enjoy year on year growth. The firm’s ninth UK office is opening in Aberdeen in May 2014.

Types of work undertaken: Corporate recovery and insolvency: the firm operates one of the largest dedicated corporate recovery teams in Scotland. The team has a significant track record of managing large and complex matters. In 2013, the team led a firm-wide, multi-disciplinary team of lawyers advising KPMG as liquidator of The Scottish Resources Group. The team is one of the few in Scotland to be on the panel for every significant UK bank. It is also heavily involved in borrower work, with significant instructions from asset-based lenders, complex and cross-border restructurings, a range of instructions from IPs and accountancy firms, in addition to significant instructions in terms of volume and quality from banks and financial institutions.

Venture capital and investment: the corporate team handled a large market share of Scotland’s investment deals in 2013. Clients include Panoramic Enterprise Capital Fund I LP and Souter Investments. The firm has a particularly strong focus on the life sciences, oil and gas, and technology sectors. The corporate team continues to develop and achieved a 10% increase in turnover in the last financial year against a background of difficulties faced by other Scottish corporate teams.

Life sciences: increasingly high-profile in this sector, the firm completed a number of deals in 2013 for various clients including Lux Assure Limited, Silent Herdsman Holdings Limited, Ambicare Health Limited, ProFactor Pharma Limited and Pharmacells Limited.

Real estate: this large cross-border team is heavily involved in all aspects of the UK real estate market. During 2013, the real estate team concluded a number of high-profile, high-value transactions, including the £120m acquisition of 41 investment properties for Harwood Real Estate; acting for PPG on the sale of ten property investment assets for more than £42m; and the purchases of two shopping centres in Edinburgh and Grangemouth for New River Retail. Other work includes portfolio acquisition and management for blue-chip clients including BT, Virgin Media, PPG, Certas Energy (formerly GB Oils) and Senergy Group. The real estate team also bought and sold several large schemes, portfolios and single assets for the likes of Deka Immobilien, PPG, IVG and Harwood Real Estate. Residential investment and development clients include Terrace Hill plc, Grainger plc and Addington Capital and several administrators in the acquisition, management and disposal of large-volume residential investment portfolios.

Energy: 2013 was a very strong year for the team in on- and offshore wind projects, with particularly high levels of activity in the sale and purchase of onshore windfarms. Clients include Burcote Wind, BT, Windflow Technology, Wind Harvest, vento ludens and ABO Wind. The top-ranking shipping team combines effectively with the energy team. The firm’s global shipping expertise and capability is unmatched. This is a significant advantage for renewables and oil and gas industries, where much of the work is done offshore. In addition, the energy team provides banking and finance, corporate, commercial, property, planning, environmental, employment and disputes advice, all from specialists with hands-on experience in the sector.

Oil and gas services sector: this team is growing in strength and reputation. It has acted for many Aberdeen, London and Dubai-based oil and gas sector clients for many years. Due to its commitment to this sector, the firm is opening an Aberdeen office in May 2014. It is known for advising oil and gas services businesses in the UK and beyond; and has strong experience (unique for a Scottish-based firm) advising clients and managing transactions in the MENA and Caspian regions. Key clients include Senergy Group (the team advised Senergy on a significant investment made by Lloyd’s Register during 2013), Topaz Energy and Marine (the firm led the team acting as English and Scottish counsel to Topaz in connection with its successful $350m high-yield bond issue in 2013), Certas Energy, Bridge Energy ASA, Briggs Marine, Divex Limited and Lux Assure.

Retail: the firm provides a range of legal services to the sector. In 2013, it concluded the purchase of two shopping centres for New River Retail. It also acted for JD Sports in the high-profile acquisition of a controlling interest in the Tiso Group Limited. Other clients include Chanel, Tommy Hilfiger, Hackett, Karl Lagerfeld, Waitrose, Mappin & Webb and Go Outdoor.

Other offices: Aberdeen, Birmingham, Dubai, Glasgow, Leeds, Leicester, London, Manchester, Nottingham

Number of UK partners 148

Number of other UK fee-earners 280

Above material supplied by Gateley Plc.

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to

    How to build an investment fraud defence case that disproves prosecution allegations of dishonesty.

    With a town council now officially facing a fraud investigation, we examine what individuals in such a large body should do if they come under suspicion.
  • The risks of liberation

    The dangers that pension liberation and money laundering pose to those involved in pension funds and management.

    What has been achieved since the introduction of the Act that was intended to tackle bribery in business?

    Five banks being fined £3.6 billion in the US for manipulating forex is a stark reminder of the legal risks involved in currency trading. Here, Aziz Rahman of Rahman Ravelli examines how the brokers and the traders in forex can avoid legal problems.
  • Foreign Intercepts

  • Finding the 
right words

    In the recent case of Newbury v Sun Microsystems [2013], the defendant argued that an offer to settle proceedings was ‘in principle' only and that a binding contract could not be formed until further terms had been agreed and a formal contract had been signed. It supported this argument by referring to a statement, in the offer letter, that the settlement was to be ‘recorded in a suitably worded agreement'. 

  • Behind the corporate veil: is that all there is?

    That companies have an existence entirely separate to that of their shareholders and directors is a foundational principle of English law and commerce.

  • Restoring environmental damage: putting a price on ecosystem services

    On 7 August 2009 a 40-inch pipeline ruptured, spilling 5,400 cubic metres of crude oil into the soil and groundwater of La Crau nature reserve in southern France, a habitat protected under French and European law. The operator had to excavate and replace 60,000 tons of soil, install 70 wells to pump and treat groundwater and 25 pumps to skim oil from surface water, at a cost in the region of €50m. However, this was just the primary remediation (that is, restoring the site to the state it would have been if the damage had not occurred). The operator was also required to compensate for the damage to the habitats and the loss of the ecosystem services that would otherwise have been provided by La Crau nature reserve. Measures included purchasing land outside of the nature reserve and contributing to its management for a period of 30 years (over €1m), monitoring the water table for 20 years (over €500,000), monitoring fauna over three years (€150,000) and rehabilitation in accordance with best available ecological techniques (nearly €2m). Overall, the compensatory restoration (to compensate for the amount of time that the ecosystem was impacted) and complimentary restoration (to compensate for elements of the ecosystem that had been permanently lost) came to more than €6.5m. 

  • The role of arbitrators in EU antitrust law

    In May 2014, it will be ten years since Regulation No 1/2003 entered into force. When the legislator of the European Union adopted this Regulation on 16 December 2002, its main objective was to decentralise the enforcement of the two main provisions of EU antitrust law, Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (now Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)). Where do the arbitrators fit in this picture?