The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon
29 - 31 ESPLANADE, ST HELIER, JE1 1LA, JERSEY
Tel:
Work 01534 888 445
Email:
Web:
www.laceyadvocates.com
Lacey Advocates, Beverley Lacey, St Helier, JERSEY

Lawyer rankings

Beverley Lacey

Tel:
Work 01534 888445
Email:
Lacey Advocates

Work Department

Commercial litigation and regulatory.

Position

With over 25 years’ experience, Beverley Lacey is a leading Jersey commercial litigation and regulatory law specialist, who acts in major cases before the island’s courts and on regulatory investigations and enforcement-action cases. Beverley is representing the Jersey government before the inquiry into historic child abuse (the Jersey Care Inquiry) and also leads the team acting for the JFSC before the island’s Royal Court and Court of Appeal. Beverley’s main clients include financial institutions, boards of directors, HNWIs, regulators and government bodies. Beverley has acted for the Jersey Financial Services Commission (JFSC) since its establishment in 1998. A crown advocate since 2000, her work also includes prosecuting on behalf of HM attorney general. As testament to her broad skill range and experience, for the Jersey government Beverley devised the Historic Abuse Redress Scheme, through which financial compensation is paid to the victims of child abuse, and oversees its administration. Beverley has an established leading reputation of managing major projects and complex cases for clients. In addition to the inquiry above, Beverley’s recent work includes having: negotiated settlements with HMRC over the establishment of 200+ trusts; overseen the wind down of a financial service business and transfer of 100+ clients to new service providers; undertaken a money laundering investigation into a bank-owned trust company; acting as reporting professional, concerning unauthorised financial services business. This work is often confidential and sensitive and not in the public domain. Beverley is a regular conference chairperson and speaker. Recent topics include regulatory investigations, AML/CFT and sanctions and company law, including directors’ duties, disqualification and shareholder rights and remedies.

Career

Trained Inns of Court School of Law. Barrister Inner Temple 1985; Chambers of Nicholas Valios QC, London 1985-90; senior litigation partner Mourant Ozannes 1990-2012; established Lacey Advocates 2012; Advocate of the Royal Court 1994; Crown Advocate 2000.

Education

Eastwood (Hall Park) School; Leeds University, LLB (Hons) 1984.

Leisure

Sailing.


Jersey

Dispute resolution

Within: Dispute resolution

Specialist litigation and regulatory boutique Lacey Advocates represents clients such as the Jersey government and the JFSC. Headed by founding partner Beverley Lacey, the team is currently advising the regulator on the enforcement of a number of potential independent financial adviser license revocations, and recently acted in a number of high-value trust disputes. Also notable are advocates Eloise Layzell, David Banks and Jane Martin.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments in Jersey

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Modernisation of Jersey’s pensions law

    Modernisation of Jersey’s pensions law
  • Jersey Opens the door to QROP’s

    Jersey opens the door to QROPs
  • Jersey Legislation Overview

    Jersey Legislation Overview
  • Civil Liability for Breaches of the Codes

    Civil Liability for Breaches of the Codes
  • AML Update: Review of 2014 amendments to the substantive offences

    AML Update: Review of 2014 amendments to the substantive offences under the Proceeds of Crime (Jersey) Law 1999 
  • The New Charities Law - a bright new dawn

    As of Friday 21 November 2014, the new Charities (Jersey) Law 2014 (the " Law ") (or at least certain parts of it) came into effect.  This represents a quantum leap forward for Jersey in the charity field.  The Law has introduced a new test for what is charitable (the " Charity Test "), has introduced the post of a Charity Commissioner and a Charity Tribunal, and in time will introduce standards that those who run charities in the Island will have to abide by.  It is hoped that the Law will enable the Island to flourish as a centre for the administration of charitable and philanthropic structures.
  • New Managed Account Regime for Jersey Hedge Fund Managers

    An exemption which will enable Jersey-regulated fund managers to be appointed in relation to managed accounts has now been introduced.  This will enable hedge fund managers that are already regulated under the Financial Services (Jersey) Law (FS Law) in Jersey to carry out fund services business (FSB) to also service qualifying segregated managed accounts (QSMAs) without the need to seek additional regulation for the conduct of investment business under the FS Law.
  • The Security Interests (Jersey) Law 2012: Changes to Jersey's security regime

    On 2 January 2014, the Security Interests (Jersey) Law 2012 came into force in respect of Jersey law security over intangible movable property (e.g. shares/securities, bank accounts and custody assets).  The new law replaces the Security Interests (Jersey) Law 1983 (which was in force for the last three decades) and introduces a number of important changes which modernise Jersey's security regime.
  • Exclusive and Inherent Jurisdictions: to boldly go where no Court has gone before?

    On 26 November 2014, the Privy Council delivered judgment in the long-running case of Crociani & Others v. Crociani & Others [2014] UKPC 40 .  The case is of interest to trustees because it provides conclusive and binding guidance on the treatment of exclusive jurisdiction clauses in trust deeds.  However, it also raises questions as to the fundamental nature of the inherent supervisory jurisdiction of the Royal Court in connection with trust matters, and whether it is in fact broader than previously thought.
  • Accessing EU Institutional investor capital

    Luxembourg is one of the largest global investment fund domiciles, benefiting from the following factors: