The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon
GRANT HOUSE, 56-60 ST JOHN STREET, LONDON, EC1M 4HG, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7183 8950
Fax:
Fax 020 7183 8951
Email:
Web:
www.brettwilson.co.uk

London: Crime, fraud and licensing

Crime: general
Crime: general - ranked: tier 4

Brett Wilson LLP

Brett Wilson LLP's 'strong criminal team' has recently advised on cases involving sexual offences, fraud, violent crime, historic sexual abuse and drug offences. 'Exceptional lawyer' Nick Brett heads the practice; he is supported by the 'tenacious and tactical' Alistair Parker.

Practice head(s):Nick Brett

Other key lawyers:Alistair Parker

Testimonials

'A boutique practice that offers impeccable client service and value for money'.

'An excellent outfit'.

'Nick Brett is an exceptional lawyer; he is extremely knowledgeable, and always a safe pair of hands'.

'Alistair Parker is tenacious, tactical and deeply committed to providing a quality service'.

[back to top]

Fraud: white-collar crime
Rising stars

Mayuri Lakhani - Brett Wilson LLP

[back to top]

London: Dispute resolution

Professional discipline
Professional discipline - ranked: tier 4

Brett Wilson LLP

Brett Wilson LLP's Nick Brett and solicitor Alistair Parker have longstanding expertise in acting for clients being investigated or facing disciplinary action. The department is particularly focused on the legal and medical professions, and the firm's lawyers are additionally experienced in criminal proceedings that often run parallel to disciplinary matters.

Practice head(s):Nick Brett

Other key lawyers:Alistair Parker

Testimonials

'Provides total care for the client'.

'The utterly great Nick Brett is unfailing in his support for clients; his dedication and capacity for work are a wonder to see'.

[back to top]

London: Risk advisory

Reputation management
Reputation management - ranked: tier 5

Brett Wilson LLP

Acting for both claimants and defendants, the 'progressive' Brett Wilson LLP conducts libel, privacy, data protection and harassment cases with a particular focus on online publication matters. The firm's defamation and privacy team headed by 'innovator' Iain Wilson also undertakes "right to be forgotten" and other internet-related claims. 'Thoughtful high-quality lawyer' Max Campbell regularly advises on harassment, stalking and revenge porn cases; the 'friendly and approachable' solicitor Tom Double also provides key support, especially in matters with a litigious aspect.

Practice head(s):Iain Wilson

Other key lawyers:Max Campbell, Tom Double; Elisabeth Mason

Testimonials

'An excellent niche firm specialising in media and communications law, providing sound advice at a reasonable cost.'

'Iain Wilson has done extremely well to build up a successful small firm in this area.'

'Max Campbell is impressive in his attention to detail and the care he takes with cases.'

'Tom Double is very bright and on-the-ball.'

'There is a core team working at Brett Wilson and each of them is a specialist in the area of reputation management. They apply a very innovative approach and use the legal remedies available in novel ways to achieve the client's aims.'

'Iain Wilson is superb. Extremely knowledgeable and very clever.'

'Iain Wilson is an innovator in this field. He is constantly looking for new ways to deal with the problems which his clients face.'

'The firm's main strengths are its long experience in the media field, especially in dealing with harassment injunctions and online publication cases, and depth of legal knowledge.'

'Brett Wilson are a go-to firm for reputation management issues. They have a team of dedicated and knowledgeable information law and reputation management specialists, using the law in novel and innovative ways to achieve the best results for clients. Their client care is excellent. '

'Highly recommend this law firm as their service is second to none.'

'Elisabeth Mason is a stand-out associate in this area, and is widely respected for her exceptional industry, judgement, knowledge and client-management. She is not afraid to roll up her sleeves when required and delivers excellent results. I cannot recommend her highly enough and she would be my first-choice associate in this area.'

Key Clients

Alison Morgan, QC

Kim Suttle

George Galloway

Association of British Bookmakers Ltd

Suhad Sadik

Life 2009 Ltd

Work highlights

  • Bringing defamation claims against the Daily Mail and The Times on behalf of Alison Morgan QC.
  • Brought a defamation/harassment claim for Kim Suttle against an individual who ran a vigilante Facebook group anonymously.
  • Acting for George Galloway in relation to committal proceedings arising from breach of a settlement agreement.
  • Defending ABBL (Association of British Bookmakers) and its spokesperson in defamation proceedings brought by Matt Zarb-Cousin, a spokesperson for the Campaign for Fairer Gambling.
  • Defending Suhad Sadik in a defamation claim brought by her brother-in-law.

[back to top]


Further information on Brett Wilson LLP

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Brett Wilson LLP in other jurisdictions.

London

Offices in London

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‚Äėcentre of life test‚Äô in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of¬† ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan ¬† [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the ‚ÄúRegulations‚ÄĚ). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess ¬†Surinder Singh ¬†cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a¬† sole representative visa ¬†is not ‚Äúa¬† majority shareholder in the overseas business‚ÄĚ.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has ¬†‚Äėpreviously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules‚Äô,¬† the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11).¬†
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 
  • PARALLEL PROCEEDINGS ‚Äď CIVIL AND CRIMINAL

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (‚Äúthe 2014 Act‚ÄĚ) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal.¬†The¬† explanatory notes ¬†to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the¬† Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 ¬†(‚Äúthe 2002 Act‚ÄĚ). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.