The Legal 500

Back to Legal500 home

Pritchard Englefield

14 NEW STREET, LONDON, EC2M 4HE, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7972 9720
Fax:
Fax 020 7972 9722
DX:
88 LONDON CHANCERY LANE
Web:
www.pe-legal.com
Email:

Bryan Bletso

Tel:
Work +44 20 7972 9720
Email:
Pritchard Englefield

Work Department

UK corporate.

Position

Partner and head of the corporate and commercial department, specialising in all aspects of business law, including commercial contracts, buying and selling of companies to businesses, joint ventures, shareholder agreements, partnership and LLP agreements, group reorganisations, start-ups, insolvency-related work and e-commerce/website work, handling a substantial amount of work for UK, North American, German, French and Austrian clients.

Career

Articled Forstye Kerman 1988-90; assistant solicitor Pritchard Englefield 1990; partner 1995.

Languages

French.

Education

Reigate Grammar School; University of Sheffield (LLB Hons 2(1)); College of Law, Lancaster Gate.

Leisure

Member of Management Committee of Dorking Football Club; a member of the management committee of local youth football club Brockham Badgers FC; qualified FA coach coaching local boys team (under 16s); committee member of Brockham Badgers FC summer tournament (a two-day football tournament for U7s to U16s attracting 1,600 players and 3,000 spectators).

Practice Areas

Corporate and commercial; Corporate finance; M&A

Back to index

Search News and Articles

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to

  • Jersey Royal Court considers measure of damages for dilapidations claims

    In the absence of any statutory provision in Jersey addressing how dilapidations claims are to be quantified, the Royal Court's decision in JSSL v Barclays has provided some much needed guidance, particularly in circumstances where there is an acceptance that works to redress dilapidations have not been and will not be carried out.
    - Ogier

  • English Supreme Court rules on Mistake and Hastings Bass

    On 9 May 2013 the English Supreme Court handed down a unanimous judgment on the seminal cases of Pitt-v- Holt and Futter -v- Futter , with Lord Walker's valedictory judgment conclusively resolving the English position on the rule in Hastings Bass and rescission on the ground of mistake.
    - Ogier

  • Getting the breaks

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
    - Falcon Chambers

  • Product liability and dietary supplements

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
    - Shook, Hardy & Bacon International LLP

  • The calm before 
the storm: are 
you prepared for 
a dawn raid?

    WilmerHale currently authors the Fraud and Corporate Crime section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
    - WilmerHale

  • International shipment of waste: transporters beware

    Burges Salmon LLP currently authors the Environment and Energy section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here
    - Burges Salmon LLP

  • Cyprus Shipping Industry : Business as usual. Why despite recent events Cyprus remains an internatio

    Cyprus is the third most populated island in the Mediterranean Sea. It is strategically located at the crossroads of Europe, Africa and the Middle East. Traditionally Cyprus has always been at the heart of the seafaring trade and therefore always functioned as an important centre for trade and commerce. Today as a member of the European Union it remains an optimal business base. It is one of the most attractive locations for foreign investments worldwide. Foreign companies have been given the opportunity to invest and establish business in Cyprus on equal terms with local investors as no distinction is made between foreign and Cypriot companies.
    - Michael Kyprianou & Co

  • FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

    The excellent support system in combination with the ideal jurisdiction provided in Cyprus set the country in the list of the most desirable countries through which you can offer foreign exchange operations. In addition, the accession of Cyprus within the European Union and, most importantly, the extremely beneficial economic advantages available due to the low costs and the outstanding taxation, create a covetable environment for foreign investors.
    - Michael Kyprianou & Co

  • National public order. Adoption of the Draft

    The Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation (hereinafter - SCC RF) adopted by the Informative Letter No. 156 dated the 26th of February, 2013 (hereinafter - the Informative Letter) on Review of the consideration by arbitrazh courts of the cases on the implementation of the public order clause as the ground for rejection of the recognition and enforcement of the foreign court decisions and arbitral awards.
    - Lidings Law Firm

  • China Customs New Interpretation

    For many products, tariff classification can be technically complex, confusing, and subject to multiple interpretations. Often several different Harmonized System Codes ("HS Code") may seem applicable for one given product with different tariff rates. Tariff classification is indeed a process of application of customs classification rules, including customs rulings and decisions, and misclassification may trigger severe legal consequences. The sad fact is, unfortunately, that many companies rely on non-legal professionals to determine the HS Codes for imports or exports. A recent interpretation issued by the General Administration of Customs of China ("GACC") (Circular No. [2012] 495 Shu-Fa-Fa) (the "Interpretation") reinforces the process of tariff classification as a legal matter, and formulates the test as to what counts for regulatory violation if tariff classification rules are improperly applied by the importer or exporter in a given case. If the legal defense is successful, misclassification may only be treated as a non-violation misclassification, with the possible obligation to pay up additional customs duties, if any, but without administrative or criminal consequences. The Interpretation took effect as from February 1, 2013.
    - Haoliwen Partners
© 2013 www.legal500.com