The Legal 500

25A WESTERN AVENUE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON, OXFORDSHIRE, OX14 4SH, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 01235 836600
Fax:
Fax 01235 836700
DX:
144160 ABINGDON-4
Web:
www.bsdr.com
Email:

Philip Shaw

Tel:
Work 01235 836652
Email:
BrookStreet des Roches LLP

Work Department

Dispute resolution.

Position

Head of dispute resolution. Philip has 25 years experience of dealings with commercial and real estate disputes at all levels of the judicial hierarchy and in all forms of dispute resolution including litigation, arbitration and adjudication and is a qualified mediator having completed an accredited course with ADR Group in March 1996. Philip has a particular interest in professional negligence involving solicitors, surveyors, architects and accountants. He also undertakes judicial review work, principally in the retail sector. Some of the reported cases he has been involved in are set out below: National Grid Company Plc v M25 Group Limited [1998] All England Reports (D) 791 – rent review and third party determination provisions in a lease did not confer on an expert the exclusive power to construe it; Nurdin and Peacock Plc v DD Ramsdon & Co [1999] All England (D) 112 – overpayments of rent made in the mistaken belief they were due and owing could be recovered as money paid by mistake, whether the mistake was one of fact or law; Fenton v Holmes [2007] All England ER (D) 12 – solicitor found negligent arising out of failure to spot an agricultural tie; R (on the application of The Midcounties Cooperative Limited) v Forest of Dean DC [2007] EWHC 1714 – the adequacy of reasons to be given as part of a planning permission for an edge of town superstore (the court found the reasons were inadequate); R (on the application of The Midcounties Cooperative Limited) v Wyre Forest District Council (1) and Tesco Stores Ltd (2) [2010] EWCA Civ 841 – challenge to the right of a retailer to build a superstore on the outskirts of an historic town; Kama Aviation Company Ltd v Zaher Nicola Jeries Deir (1) and Jet Connections Ltd (2) [2010] EWHC 1276 (QB) – commission claim commission arising from the sale of a Boeing 737 aircraft in complex commercial arrangements with a Saudi Sheikh. Net judgment of more than $130,000 in favour of the agent; and Zaher Nicola Jeries Deir v Fahad Bin Saleh Mohammed Al Athel and Others [2011] EWHC 354 (QB) – acting in further ‘acrimonious litigation’ relating to director’s fees including various counterclaims with net judgment of over £250,000 in favour of the claimant.

Career

Trained Allan Janes & Co; qualified 1988; Linnells (now Blake Lapthorn), partner 1991; partner and head of dispute resolution BrookStreet des Roches LLP 1994 to date.

Member

Property Lawyers Association (PLA); Professional Negligence Lawyers Association (PNLA).

Education

The John Hampden Grammar School; Kingston University (LLB 1985); College of Law, Guildford (Solicitors Finals 1986).

Leisure

Golf, skiing, spinning, watching rugby.

Practice Areas

Litigation - commercial; Professional negligence; Property - litigation

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Legal Remedy Against Decisions About Precautionary Attachment

    In this article, we have reviewed the legal opinion and information about rejection of precautionary attachments and decisions considering Code of Civil Procedure ( "Code" ) numbered 6100 and Court of Appeal Assembly of Civil Chambers Precedent Decision numbered 2013/1 E. 2014/1 K.  /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Calibri; mso-ansi-language:TR; mso-fareast-language:TR;}
  • Well – Known Trademark

     
  • Introduction to IP in Turkey

    Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;} In the world where the importance of corporate image increases, nonmaterial assets, become more of a nonfigurative issue, day by day. Trademarks, patents - utility models, industrial designs, copyrights and unfair competition are the main subjects of Intellectual Property. We will discuss each of these subjects below.
  • All Aboard… Have Your Passports Ready II

    Our previous article in the November 2013 edition of the Chronicle introduced the genesis of the Asia Region Funds Passport project, being a framework to allow collective investment schemes ( CIS ) established and regulated in a passport member economy (the home economy ) to be offered to investors in other passport member economies (the host economy ) [1] . The working group members 2 have since released a consultation paper 3 setting out proposals relating to the application process and supervision / enforcement regime for the ARFP, as well as substantive criteria relating to the eligibility of passport funds, licensing of the passport fund operator, operation of the passport fund and investor interactions.
  • The Forthcoming LCIA Rules: A Snapshot of Current Trends in International Arbitration

    Introduction
  • Cross-Border Insolvencies – Building Blocks Towards Universalism

    The theory of universality in insolvency, along with globalisation, has gained much traction across many jurisdictions in recent years. Briefly, the universality theory proposes that an insolvency proceeding has worldwide effect over all the assets of the insolvent company, wherever they may be.
  • FAQs on the SGD-Denominated Corporate Bond Market

    We have compiled below a series of responses to questions which we frequently encounter in the course of advising our clients, and we hope that these will be useful for your planning purposes.  
  • Challenging Times: Arbitrator Bias and Investment Treaty Arbitration

    In the previous issue, we explored the English court's approach to challenges mounted by a party against an arbitrator's independence or impartiality under the UK's legislative framework for arbitration in the context of commercial arbitration. In this issue we will compare how similar challenges are resolved before arbitral tribunals in the context of investment treaty arbitration.
  • Red-Card – Penalty!

    Penalty clauses are unenforceable under both English and Singapore law. A distinction has traditionally been drawn between liquidated damages clauses and penalty clauses: while the former provides for a genuine, pre-determined compensation for a breach of contract and is upheld, the latter goes beyond compensation, seeks to deter parties from breaching a contract by penalizing that party and is unenforceable (see the seminal case of Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Company Limited v New Garage and Motor Company Limited [1]).
  • Halting Harassment

    Disgruntled employees and customers can sometimes wreak havoc in businesses.