The Legal 500

Work 01235 836600
Fax 01235 836700
144160 ABINGDON-4

Lawyer rankings

Philip Shaw

Work 01235 836652
BrookStreet des Roches LLP

Work Department

Dispute resolution.


Head of dispute resolution. Philip has 25 years experience of dealings with commercial and real estate disputes at all levels of the judicial hierarchy and in all forms of dispute resolution including litigation, arbitration and adjudication and is a qualified mediator having completed an accredited course with ADR Group in March 1996. Philip has a particular interest in professional negligence involving solicitors, surveyors, architects and accountants. He also undertakes judicial review work, principally in the retail sector. Some of the reported cases he has been involved in are set out below: National Grid Company Plc v M25 Group Limited [1998] All England Reports (D) 791 – rent review and third party determination provisions in a lease did not confer on an expert the exclusive power to construe it; Nurdin and Peacock Plc v DD Ramsdon & Co [1999] All England (D) 112 – overpayments of rent made in the mistaken belief they were due and owing could be recovered as money paid by mistake, whether the mistake was one of fact or law; Fenton v Holmes [2007] All England ER (D) 12 – solicitor found negligent arising out of failure to spot an agricultural tie; R (on the application of The Midcounties Cooperative Limited) v Forest of Dean DC [2007] EWHC 1714 – the adequacy of reasons to be given as part of a planning permission for an edge of town superstore (the court found the reasons were inadequate); R (on the application of The Midcounties Cooperative Limited) v Wyre Forest District Council (1) and Tesco Stores Ltd (2) [2010] EWCA Civ 841 – challenge to the right of a retailer to build a superstore on the outskirts of an historic town; Kama Aviation Company Ltd v Zaher Nicola Jeries Deir (1) and Jet Connections Ltd (2) [2010] EWHC 1276 (QB) – commission claim commission arising from the sale of a Boeing 737 aircraft in complex commercial arrangements with a Saudi Sheikh. Net judgment of more than $130,000 in favour of the agent; and Zaher Nicola Jeries Deir v Fahad Bin Saleh Mohammed Al Athel and Others [2011] EWHC 354 (QB) – acting in further ‘acrimonious litigation’ relating to director’s fees including various counterclaims with net judgment of over £250,000 in favour of the claimant.


Trained Allan Janes & Co; qualified 1988; Linnells (now Blake Lapthorn), partner 1991; partner and head of dispute resolution BrookStreet des Roches LLP 1994 to date.


Property Lawyers Association (PLA); Professional Negligence Lawyers Association (PNLA).


The John Hampden Grammar School; Kingston University (LLB 1985); College of Law, Guildford (Solicitors Finals 1986).


Golf, skiing, spinning, watching rugby.

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Awards in Kazakhstan: Issues and Practical Reco

    Lyailya Tleulina, AEQUITAS Senior Associate
  • Claeys & Engels presents its VerkiezingsWijzer/Guide Pratique Elections Sociales

    The next social elections will take place between 9 and 22 May 2016. Whether or not these are your company’s first elections, you will know that they require very thorough preparation.
  • New Labor Code: Notes on the Margins

    Yulia Chumachenko, Partner, AEQUITAS Law Firm
  • CSSF clarifies marketing rules in updated AIFMD law Q&A

    On August 10, the CSSF issued the latest update of its Frequently Asked Questions document on the grand duchy’s law of July 12, 2013 implementing the AIFMD and the European Commission’s Level 2 regulation on implementation of the directive, last revised on December 29, 2014. The FAQ document has now run to nine versions over the past year and a half. Its aim is to highlight aspects of the AIFMD rules from a Luxembourg perspective, for the benefit primarily of alternative funds and managers established in the grand duchy. It complements Q&A documents on the AIFMD published by ESMA, itself most recently updated last month, and by the European Commission.
  • Europe: EU-Export Compliance – Loosening of Iran trade restrictions

    In order to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear programme for the construction of weapons of mass destruction ("WMD"), the UN Security Council from July 2006 onwards passed a series of resolutions by which several foreign trade restrictions were imposed on Iran. Consequently, the EU too enacted a series of restrictive measures against Iran through which the UN resolutions have been implemented and materially amended. The EU has imposed additional sanctions against Iran due to human rights infringements and internal repression in Iran. Currently, the following EU trade restrictions are in place:  read more

    In the recent times, warranty and after sales service problems have occurred on the sales of imported and cheaper goods on the internet except the sales by authorized distributor. It has been discussed for a long time whether parallel import is permissible in Turkish law. Now, this matter is discussed by consumers and importers as well.
  • Evaluation in Mediation

    Proponents of the purist approach to mediation argue that evaluative mediation is not mediation at all. In 1996, Professor Riskin produced a grid (“Riskin’s Grid”), in an attempt to encompass within it the various dispute resolution methods commonly referred to as mediation. The Grid gave rise to a controversy amongst writers because it included evaluative mediation. This article explores the limits of mediation by considering the extent to which evaluation can be used in mediation without deviating from the basic principles upon which mediation developed.  Evaluation in Mediation "Read more..."
  • Changes to New Zealand’s anti-dumping laws

    Changes to New Zealand’s anti-dumping laws
  • New health and safety laws passed by New Zealand Parliament

    New health and safety laws passed by Parliament
  • Removal of sanctions against Iran

    Removal of sanctions against Iran Ian Gault , Partner and  Andy Glenie , Senior Associate | Tuesday 25 August 2015 Since 2006, the international community led by the United Nations (UN) Security Council has imposed a range of sanctions against Iran in response to its nuclear development programme. 1