The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Fletcher Day

110 CANNON ST, MAYFAIR, LONDON, EC4N 6EU, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7766 5260
Fax:
Fax 020 7240 7617
DX:
37227 PICCADILLY
Email:
Web:
www.fletcherday.co.uk
Horsham, London EC2V, London EC4N

London: Dispute resolution

Commercial litigation
Commercial litigation - ranked: tier 8

Fletcher Day

Fletcher Day's team is 'friendly, approachable and knowledgeable, and it is praised for its agility, responsiveness and availability'. Jovita Vassallo specialises in complex multi-jurisdictional disputes in the English commercial courts and Luiz Costa is the senior associate to note.

Practice head(s):Jovita Vassallo

Other key lawyers:Luiz Costa

Testimonials

'Good knowledge and the ability to move things forward'.

'Jovita Vassallo is brilliant'.

'Senior associate Luiz Costa provides superb assistance'.

Key Clients

Brazilian Navy

Welsh & Jefferies

Work highlights

  • Acted in a Court of Appeal matter concerning the beneficial ownership of foreign companies and the enforceability of English judgments against third parties.

[back to top]

London: Human resources

Immigration
Immigration: business - ranked: tier 6

Fletcher Day

Fletcher Day's immigration offering is 'professional, responsive and possesses strong technical abilities'. The team demonstrates particular expertise in advising individual clients on the entrepreneur visa route, and is also experienced in advising high-net-worth individuals on investor applications. Corporate clients also turn to the practice for advice on sponsor licences, including companies across the fashion, consultancy, financial services and dentistry sectors.

Practice head(s):Sam Meymand

Testimonials

The team excels at identifying the unique needs of the client and matches solutions in an expeditious and professional manner.

Sam Meymand gives thorough attention to detail and is extremely attentive to the needs of his clients.

The team combines professionalism, skill, a commercial approach and personalised care.

Sam Meymand has a very personable approach.

Sam Meymand is highly engaged with all clients

Sam Meymand consistently delivers a premium service.

Work highlights

  • Advised an ultra-high-net worth client, with Indian and St Kitts nationality and domiciled in the UAE, on his application for entry clearance as a Tier 1 investor.
  • Advised an Iranian and Dominican high-net-worth individual, with a leading pharmaceutical business in Germany, who was looking to move to the UK on the Entrepreneur visa.
  • Advised an international hotel chain on sponsor license issues.
  • Advised an investment bank in London on the sponsor management system and a number of issues relating to its migrant employees and Brexit.
  • Advised a company established in the USA and South Africa on its establishment in the UK which included advising on the transfer of one of its senior employees from South Africa to the UK.

[back to top]

London: Real estate

Property litigation
Property litigation - ranked: tier 5

Fletcher Day

With particular expertise in retail and leisure industry work, Fletcher Day handles landlord and tenant disputes, neighbourly issues, such as right of access and right of way, alongside property purchase disputes and property development-related matters across the commercial and residential property sectors. Chris Hill and Greg Barnbrook jointly head the practice, which also acts for individuals.

Practice head(s):Chris Hill; Greg Barnbrook

Key Clients

British Steel Pension Fund

Toni & Guy Group

Cote Restaurants

Jackson & Rye Restaurants

Newbury Properties

Seed Property Group

Gelato Mio

Berjaya Hotel Group

Spaces Group

O’Mara Properties

Salaft Properties

Sawalana

Attention Seekers Productions

Inspired Asset Management

Work highlights

  • Acted for Seed Property Group in a development dispute with a tenant of the freehold building it acquired and wishes to develop by extending and adding additional dwellings.

[back to top]


Further information on Fletcher Day

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Fletcher Day in other jurisdictions.

London

Offices in London EC4N and London EC2V

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‚Äėcentre of life test‚Äô in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of¬† ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan ¬† [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the ‚ÄúRegulations‚ÄĚ). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess ¬†Surinder Singh ¬†cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a¬† sole representative visa ¬†is not ‚Äúa¬† majority shareholder in the overseas business‚ÄĚ.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has ¬†‚Äėpreviously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules‚Äô,¬† the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11).¬†
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 
  • PARALLEL PROCEEDINGS ‚Äď CIVIL AND CRIMINAL

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (‚Äúthe 2014 Act‚ÄĚ) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal.¬†The¬† explanatory notes ¬†to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the¬† Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 ¬†(‚Äúthe 2002 Act‚ÄĚ). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.