The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co

AMARCHAND TOWERS, 216 OKHLA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, PHASE 3, NEW DELHI 110 020, INDIA
Tel:
Work +91 11 4159 0700
Fax:
Fax +91 11 2692 4900
Email:
Web:
www.amsshardul.com
Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Chennai, Gurugram, Kolkata, Mumbai and 1 more

Lawyer rankings

Anuj Berry

Tel:
Work + 91 11 4159 0700
Email:
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co

Work Department

Litigation, Dispute Resolution, White Collar Defense Group

Position

Anuj joined Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas in 2006 and is a Partner with the Firm’s Litigation, Dispute Resolution and White Collar Defense Group. He advises and represents large domestic and multinational corporations in a variety of regulatory investigations including those pertaining to anti-corruption, anti-money laundering as also internal investigations.

His key work experience on White Collar Defense matters is as under:

Advising the principal shareholder of a low-cost airline in India on allegations of fraudulent transactions engaged in by the ex-CEO of the airline basis a whistle-blower complaint and investigations initiated by the Enforcement Directorate, local police and connected litigation.

  1. Advising the principal shareholder of a low-cost airline in India on allegations of fraudulent transactions engaged in by the ex-CEO of the airline basis a whistle-blower complaint and investigations initiated by the Enforcement Directorate, local police and connected litigation.
  2. Advising a global professional services firm on allegations of favouritism in hiring practices basis a whistle-blower complaint.
  3. Advising a U.S. based corporation distributing mobile phones and other devices on allegations of vendor kickbacks and tampering with financial statements basis a whistle-blower complaint.
  4. Representing a large foreign retailer in investigations and court related action concerning the first investigation initiated against a private company by the Central Vigilance Commission in India. The investigations in India relate to an ongoing FCPA investigation in the United States.
  5. Representing a Malaysian media company in investigations before the federal anti-corruption investigating authority (CBI), money laundering authority and the proceedings before the Special Court setup by the Supreme Court of India to conduct the trial of cases pertaining to the ‘2G Spectrum Scam’ (India’s largest telecom industry-related scam). His work involves assisting clients and senior management in all aspects of the investigation, guiding defense strategy, advise on extradition issues and representation before Court.
  6. Advising a large US appliance manufacturer on the India leg of their FCPA audit.
  7. Advising a leading investment bank in relation to its investment in a media company which is facing investigations by various regulatory and investigative agencies in India.
  8. Represented the Indian subsidiary of a French transport company in investigations before the federal anti-corruption investigating authority (CBI) concerning alleged bribery allegations initiated at the instance of the United Kingdom Serious Frauds Investigation Office.

Anuj actively contributes articles in global publications. Mentioning a few as under:

  • “Making Section 482 CrPC the sole remedy – Case Study of Madras High Court's judgment in K.Raghupathy v The Commissioner of Police”, Mondaq (September 2017).
  • “Supreme Court On Admissibility Of Electronic Records As Secondary Evidence”, Mondaq (July 2017).
  • “The Consumer Is Paramount – National Consumer Commission's Assertion Of Its Jurisdiction”, Mondaq (July 2017).
  • “Retrospective application of Prevention of Money Laundering Act”, ILO (July 2017).

Career

Anuj joined Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas in 2006. He worked with the Firm till 2009 when he took a sabbatical to pursue Bachelor of Civil Laws (BCL) at the University of Oxford and then re-joined the firm in 2010. While at Oxford, he undertook academic and practical training in International Dispute Settlement. He gained his LLB from National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata.

Languages

English, Hindi

Member

Bar Council of Delhi

Education

B.A., LL.B (Hons.), National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata, BCL (Oxon)


India

White-collar crime

Within: Leading individuals

Anuj Berry - Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co

Within: White-collar crime

Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co’s ‘impeccable’ team ‘exceeds all expectations’, providing ‘solid attention to detail, good response times and excellent value for money’. The practice advises on Indian laws relating to bribery, money laundering, corporate fraud and data theft, its key clients including a range of banks, private equity firms and multinational corporations. Recent work includes representing Citibank before the Court of Appeal in a matter involving various offences, and acting for Samsung in a criminal prosecution regarding data theft, cheating and misappropriation. Pallavi Shroff heads the practice, and Anuj Berry is the other name to note.

[back to top]


IHL Briefings

If your firm wishes to publish IHL Briefings or articles, please contact Antony Dine on +44 (0) 207 396 9315 or antony.dine@legalease.co.uk

 

Nikesh Tarachand Shah v. Union of India Constitutionality of the pre-bail conditions provid

June 2018. By Anuj Berry

Introduction The question “Bail or Jail ?” at the pre-trail stage, as famously pointed out by the famous Indian jurist, Hon’ble V R Krishna Iyer, shall always belong to the “blurred area of the criminal justice system ” [1] . The Indian courts, in line with the Eight Amendment of the US Constitution, have acknowledged that ‘bail, not jail, is the norm’ [2] but at the same time have also evolved principles such as “collective interest of the community and the safety of the nation ” [3] , to carefully balance the interest of the state and the rights of the accused while deciding bail applications made by accused persons. [Continue Reading]

Back to index

Legal Developments in India

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • BRAND-JACKING

    WHAT IS BRANDJACKING?
  • Post Marketing Surveillance of Drugs

    Post marketing surveillance is performed after market approval/clinical trials of drugs in India. The regulatory framework for conducting clinical trials of drugs is provided under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 (“ Act ”) and the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 (“ Rules ”). Further, Part X-A and Schedule Y of the Rules specifically deal with the statutory provisions applicable for clinical trial of drugs in India. Schedule Y divides Clinical trial of drugs into 4 Phases, namely, Human Pharmacology (Phase-I), Therapeutic exploratory trials (Phase-II), Therapeutic confirmatory trials (Phase III) and Post Marketing Trials (Phase-IV).
  • Protection of Biotechnology under Indian Laws

    According to the eighth annual survey conducted by the Association of Biotechnology-Led Enterprises (ABLE) and Bio Spectrum, the Indian biotech industry grew threefold in just five years to report revenues of US$ 3 billion in 2009-10, a rise of 17 per cent over the previous year. Maintaining the momentum of the previous years, the Indian biotech industry grew 16.28 per cent in FY2014; the total industry size was US$ 5 billion at the end of the financial year and it reached US$ 7 billion in FY2015. Fast-paced growth is likely to continue; the industry is expected to increase in size to USD11.6 billion by 2017, driven by a range   of factors such as growing demand, intensive R & D activities and strong government initiatives ( http://www.ibef.org/industry/biotechnology-india.aspx )
  • Cabinet Approves India’s IPR Policy - “Creative India; Innovative India: रचनात्म??

    The Union Cabinet on 13 May 2016 approved the National Intellectual Property Right (IPR) policy roadmap ( http://dipp.gov.in/English/Schemes/Intellectual_Property_Rights/National_IPR_Policy_12.05.2016.pdf ) to foster creativity and innovation, promote entrepreneurship and enhance socio development, enhance access to healthcare, food security and environmental protection. The Policy recognizes the abundance of creative and innovative energies that flow in India, and the need to tap into and channelize these energies towards a better and brighter future for all.
  • Real Estate - India

    Real Estate - India
  • SEBI’s Jurisdiction | Analysis of the Supreme Court judgment in the Sahara case

    The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) is responsible for investor protection and development and regulation of the securities market in India. The scope of SEBI’s jurisdiction over the issue of securities by public companies is an important issue. This issue was recently considered by the Supreme Court in Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Ltd. and Ors. v. Securities and Exchange Board of India and Anr., MANU/SC/0702/2012; (2012) 8 SCALE 101. This article analyses this judgment and its implications.
  • Mainstreaming the Alternative: Issuance of NCDs

    Debt financing is a significant means for corporates to raise capital. Indian regulators have taken a number of steps to deepen the Indian debt market. Permission has been granted to foreign institutional investors (FIIs) and qualified foreign investors (QFIs) to invest in non-convertible debentures (NCDs) issued by Indian companies. This article summarises the legal and regulatory requirements for Indian companies to issue NCDs to FIIs and QFIs.
  • Options – Not a Part of History Yet

    At the time when India is completing two decades of the economic liberalization there are several laurels which the policymakers can boast of.   The path-breaking shift from the license-raj to a regime focusing on regulation introduced by the Government of India in the landmark year 1991 have been continued through further economic reforms and the same has also found support from the regulators and the market players.
  • Liberalization Back on Track with the Relaxation of Share Transfer Norms

    Soon after the rollback of the much criticized aspect of the Consolidated Foreign Direct Investment policy dated October 1, 2011 which treated foreign investments in Indian securities as external commercial borrowings in case such investments conferred options on the foreign investors, the policy makers have brought more good news for the investor community.
  • Franchising in India

    In the last two decades, India has witnessed a sea change in its foreign investment policy resulting in it being one of the most preferred investment destinations. With growing globalisation and liberalisation, brand awareness has been created in the Indian masses and today India is the one of the biggest and fastest emerging markets for various businesses across the world. Being geographically vast and culturally diverse, India offers the most favorable franchising environment with a huge consumer market. Franchising in this respect has managed to pick up as a successful business module for local companies in India.