The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Bird & Bird

8/F, CHINA WORLD TOWER 1, 1 JIANGUOMENWAI DAJIE, CHAOYANG DISTRICT, BEIJING 100004, CHINA
Tel:
Work +86 10 5933 5688
Email:
Web:
www.twobirds.com

China: Corporate and M&A

Foreign firms
Corporate and M&A: foreign firms - ranked: tier 4

Bird & Bird 鸿鹄律师事务所

Bird & Bird’s Shanghai-based partner Sven-Michael Werner is highly rated and the mainland China practice was augmented by the recruitment of Beijing corporate head John Shi and Shan Lai as partners from DLA Piper. Recent work for the team saw it assist IAI, one of Israel’s three largest defence companies, with establishing a civil aviation maintenance and repair joint venture in China.

[back to top]

China: Dispute resolution

Foreign firms
Other recommended firms - ranked: tier 1

Bird & Bird 鸿鹄律师事务所

[back to top]

China: Employment

Foreign firms
Other recommended firms - ranked: tier 1

Bird & Bird 鸿鹄律师事务所

[back to top]

China: Intellectual property

Foreign firms
Intellectual property: foreign firms - ranked: tier 1

Bird & Bird 鸿鹄律师事务所

A strong, diverse team’, Bird & Bird is rated for its ‘great understanding’ in the IP field. In Hong Kong, the ‘excellent’ Ted Chwu has been leading the team in the Chinese aspects of assisting Gibson Innovations with managing its patent portfolio and representing the client in patent and design litigation, as well as enforcement actions. The team includes Shanghai-based Christine Yiu, who specialises in handling technology litigation, and Beijing-based Rieko Michishita, who is experienced in acting for clients in cross-border IP litigation. Clients regard Hong Kong-based practice head Matthew Laight as having ‘great technical understanding’.

Leading individuals

Matthew Laight - Bird & Bird

Next generation lawyers

Dorie Wong - Bird & Bird

[back to top]

China: TMT

Foreign firms
TMT: foreign firms - ranked: tier 2

Bird & Bird 鸿鹄律师事务所

Clients rate Bird & Bird for its ‘good response time and industry knowledge’. The team specialises in telecoms regulatory advice, data protection and commercial transactions, most notably in the sports and media sectors. Clients include Warner Bros., Huawei and Kaspersky. In Hong Kong, ‘very experienced’ co-head Michelle Chan often advises domestic and international telecoms operators, media companies and institutional investors on data protection issues. Justin Walkey is the other practice co-head.

[back to top]


Further information on Bird & Bird LLP

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Bird & Bird LLP in other jurisdictions.

United Arab Emirates

Offices in Abu Dhabi and Dubai

Australia

Offices in Sydney

Belgium

Offices in Brussels

China

Offices in Beijing and Shanghai

Czech Republic

Offices in Prague

Germany

Offices in Munich, Dusseldorf, Frankfurt, and Hamburg

Denmark

Offices in Aarhus and Copenhagen

Spain

Offices in Madrid

Finland

Offices in Helsinki

France

Offices in Paris and Lyon

Hong Kong

Offices in Hong Kong

Hungary

Offices in Budapest

India

Italy

Offices in Milan and Rome

London

Offices in London

Netherlands

Offices in The Hague

Poland

Offices in Warsaw

Sweden

Offices in Stockholm

Singapore

Offices in Singapore

Slovakia

Offices in Bratislava

Legal Developments by:
Bird & Bird LLP

  • gTLDs Update: List of gTLD applications published

    Earlier this month, we reported that the list of gTLD applications would be published on 13 June 2012. "Reveal Day" has arrived and the list of gTLD applications has been published on ICANN's website. Please click here to download a PDF copy of this list for your review.
    - ATMD Bird & Bird LLP

Legal Developments in China

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • What is the relationship between PPP and concessions?

    From fledgling concessions to PPP that is sweeping the country today, there are two major sets of regulations to be followed: one being regulations for concessions led by the National Development and Reform Commission (“NDRC”) and the other the series of regulations for PPP led by the Ministry of Finance (“MoF”).  However, to date, there is still not one law that expressly defines the relationship between the two, resulting in much confusion and many impediments in practice.  The relationship between concessions and PPP is an issue currently desperately needing clarification.
  • Thought on Developing Convention on Enforceability of Settlement Agreements Reached Through Concilia

    The UN Commission on International Trade Law (“UNCITRAL”) held its 47th session in New York on 7-18 July 2014 and the Author had the privilege of attending the conference at invitation of Mr. Yu Jianlong, President of the Asia Pacific Regional Arbitration Group (“APRAG”). During the conference, the U.S. Government submitted a proposal suggesting Working Group II (Arbitration and Conciliation) of UNCITRAL (“Working Group II”) to develop a multilateral convention with respect of the enforceability of international commercial settlement agreements reached through conciliation (“Enforceability Convention”) for the purpose of encouraging the use of conciliation in resolving international commercial disputes.  Read more
  • Impact of Article 43 of the Commercial Bank Law on PPP Projects

    With the widespread use of the PPP model in China, financing channels for PPP projects have also increasingly diversified.  Bank, trust, fund and insurance channels of capital have all rushed onto the stage of project financing. Subject to Article 43 of the Commercial Bank Law, banks, as the traditional big brother of financing, have always played the role of lender.  In practice, the opinions as to whether they can participate in the bidding on, and contributing capital to, PPP projects as private investors have been mixed.
  • A LOOK BACK AND THOUGHTS ON PPP LEGAL PRACTICE IN CHINA IN 2015

    The current PPP tide in China driven by the Ministry of Finance and the National Development and Reform Commission witnesses the transformation and upgrading of large state-owned enterprises.  These enterprises that have traditionally only been familiar with bid invitation, bid submission, and construction, have started to have an impact on numerous new areas such as project proposal and planning, company establishment and acquisition, fund establishment and operation, etc.  Certain state-owned enterprises that got their starts fairly early have cultivated teams with extensive experience in investing, and certain enterprises that are just starting up are selecting young talent from various entities in all out effort to catch up.  Private enterprises also participate enthusiastically.
  • Transfer Pricing – New Risks in Declaring Price Impact of Special Relationship to China Customs

    China Customs recently requires that the importer or exporter of record declare the impact on the import or export price of its special relationship with the counterpart (“Price Impact”). Specifically the declaring party must state whether its special relationship, if any, would affect the transaction value or price as declared to the China Customs. Previously the special relationship was an item of declaration subsequent to a specific request from the Customs. However, the impact of the special relationship was not an item of declaration, and the declaration party even had a general defense right to disprove such Price Impact. The Price Impact, if any, has been a pre-condition for  the Customs not to accept the declared transfer price for the purpose of ascertaining dutiable price of a given import or export shipment, in which case, China Customs shall re-value the given shipment according to China customs valuation rules.
  • New China Customs Taxation Policy on Cross-Border B2C E-Commerce Imports

    The Ministry of Finance, General Administration of Customs and State Administration of Taxation of China jointly issued a circular (“Joint Circular ”) relating to the taxation policy on the cross-border e-commerce retailing imports, with effect as from April 8, 2016.
  • ICC and CIETAC Arbitration Practice Comparison - Case Study Note 1

    One of the most important negotiated points by parties in contract negotiations is the dispute resolution clause. If parties agree on arbitration, they often negotiate which arbitration institution or arbitration rules will apply in resolving potential disputes.
  • Interpretation of New Anti-monopoly Provisions in the Field of Intellectual Property Rights:

    Ren Qing and Wu Peng, Partners in Zhong Lun Law Firm
  • POTENTIAL CHANGE OF CHINA’S FOREIGN INVESTMENT LAWS AND ITS EFFECT ON VIE STRUCTURES

    By Steve Zhao
  • Zhong Lun Advises Chinese Consortium on $1.9 Billion Acquisition of OmniVision Technologies, Inc.

    On April 30, 2015, OmniVision Technologies, Inc. (OVTI, a Delaware company listed on NASDAQ) announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to be acquired by a consortium composed of Hua Capital Management Co. Ltd. (“Hua Capital Management”), CITIC Capital Holdings Limited (“CITIC Capital”) and GoldStone Investment Co. Ltd. (“GoldStone Investment”) (collectively, the “Consortium”). Under the terms of the agreement, OmniVision stockholders will receive $29.75 per share in cash, or a total of approximately $1.9 billion. The agreement was unanimously approved by OmniVision’s Board of Directors.