The Legal 500

Tuckers Solicitors

39 WARREN STREET, LONDON, W1T 6AF, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7388 8333
Fax:
Fax 0845 330 7268
DX:
123596 REGENTS PARK-3
Web:
www.tuckerssolicitors.com
Email:

What we say about the firm's legal practice in London

Crime, fraud and licensing

Within Crime, Tuckers Solicitors is a first tier firm,

Philip Smith and Nick Inge head up the teams at Tuckers Solicitors’ Central and South London offices, respectively. Recent work for Smith includes successfully representing Jack Tweed in a high-profile rape trial, while Inge has been acting in three gang-related murder cases. Fiona Dunkley is currently acting as solicitor-advocate in a number of Crown Court cases.

Within Fraud: white-collar crime , Tuckers Solicitors is a third tier firm,

Tuckers Solicitors has seen a significant increase in high-quality, high-value instructions. Richard Egan and Jim Meyer advised a senior employee at BAE in the SFO’s international corruption investigation.

Public sector

Within Civil liberties and human rights, Tuckers Solicitors is a second tier firm,

Jules Carey’s team at Tuckers Solicitors is currently ‘leading the way on control order litigation’. The group has experience in bringing actions against the police and in anti-terrorism law, including in complex claims for false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, discrimination and deaths in custody. In 2010 Carey successfully represented a client in a challenge against HM Treasury regarding the government’s asset-freezing regime, and his other recent work includes advising Ian Tomlinson’s family in the inquest into Tomlinson’s death during the 2009 G20 protests. Andre Clovis is recommended, and solicitor Zareena Mustafa has a ‘cool head’.


Further information on Tuckers Solicitors

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Tuckers Solicitors in other jurisdictions.

London

Offices in London SE5 and London W1T

North West

Offices in Manchester

West Midlands

Offices in Birmingham

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • COUNCIL TAX

    In Harrow LBC v Ayiku [2012] EWHC 1200 (Admin) Sales J held that the word “or” in the Council Tax (Exempt Dwellings) Order 1992, art 3 Class N, had a disjunctive meaning, therefore it was sufficient for the non-British spouse of a foreign student to satisfy one or other of the two conditions, namely being prevented from taking paid employment or being prevented from claiming benefits, in order to qualify as a “relevant person” who was exempted from liability to pay council tax.
    - 11KBW
  • QUEEN’S SPEECH

    Bills already introduced pursuant to the Queen’s Speech on 9 May 2012 include Local Government Finance Bill and Electoral Registration and Administration Bill, both accompanied by Explanatory Notes, which in each case address ECHR compatibility.
    - 11KBW
  • Standards

    In R (Calver) v Adjudication Panel for Wales [2012] EWHC 1172 (Admin) Mr Calver was a member of Manorbier Community Council who successfully challenged the decision of the Panel to dismiss his appeal against a decision by Prembrokeshire County Council Standards Committee censuring him for a number of comments or blogs posted by him on a website he owned and controlled.
    - 11KBW
  • A justified retrospective

    Clive Sheldon - QC debates the pros & cons of retrospective tax legislation
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty (“PSED”)

    In R (Greenwich Community Law Centre) v Greenwich LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 496 the Court of Appeal held that the Council had had “due regard to the PSED when making changes to its funding of community legal advice services”. At para 30 Elias LJ said:
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty

    Surrey County Council conducted a review of its Library Service. This culminated in a Report to the Council’s Cabinet. The Recommendations in the Report included that there should be consultation about a community-partnership approach at selected Libraries.
    - 11KBW
  • Judicial Review

    The Judgment of Lindblom J in The Manydown Co Ltd v Basingstoke and Deane BC [2012] EWHC 977 (Admin) repays attention. The Claimant sought to challenge by judicial review 2 decisions of the Council: (1) the Council’s refusal to reconsider its position on the development of a site that it owns (and is the subject matter of a Joint Development Partnership Agreement with the Claimant); and (2) a decision of the Council’s Cabinet approving a selection of sites for development which did not include this site.
    - 11KBW
  • The Health and Social Care Act 2012: impact on adult social services

    After its torrid passage through Parliament, the Health and Social Care Bill received Royal Assent on 27 March 2012. The Act deals principally with healthcare reform, but it also contains some amendments to the legislative framework for social care. It will come into force on a day yet to be appointed by the Secretary of State.
    - 11KBW
  • Immigration update May 2012

    In this issue:
  • Premium service for tier 2 and 5 sponsors to be launched

    A premium service for sponsors will be launched by the UKBA on 6 April 2012. The service is designed specifically for companies that sponsor international employees under tier 2 and 5 of the points based system and aims to provide them with enhanced support.