The Legal 500

16 TOOKS COURT, CURSITOR STREET, LONDON, EC4A 1LB, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7025 4450
Fax:
Fax 020 7242 3988
DX:
218 CHANCERY LANE
Web:
www.shearmanbowen.co.uk
Email:

Shearman Bowen & Co specialises in heavyweight criminal defence work and white-collar crime, with a growing reputation and proven track record in criminal confiscation and Proceeds of Crime Act cases.

The firm: Shearman Bowen & Co is a specialist criminal law practice renowned for its expertise in the full range of criminal defence work. The firm’s core business in serious and financial crime has continued to derive substantially from professional and own-client referrals.

The firm was founded in 2001 as a two-partner practice by Rick Shearman and Mark Bowen, and for years operated as a ‘well-kept secret’ in the profession. Listed in The Legal 500 for the first time in 2009, this expanding firm currently fields a team of 11 experienced and dedicated solicitors specialising in serious crime, business crime, criminal confiscation and POCA work.

Types of work undertaken: Fraud: the firm regularly defends individuals in criminal investigations and prosecutions brought by the Serious Fraud Office, HM Revenue & Customs, the Fraud Prosecution Service, the Financial Services Authority, local authorities, and other regulatory and investigative institutions.

Current/recent instructions include: defending the lead defendant in four-month, nine-handed charity fraud; advising a private client in relation to a City of London Police investigation into the £40m GFX Capital Markets collapse; defending a mortgage broker accused of a £23m fraud following collapse of the Money Machine chain; advising a client on a joint City of London Police/FSA/Lloyds of London investigation into international insurance fraud; advising a private client on Safe Deposit Centres Ltd investigation; defending an international banker accused of laundering the proceeds of crime through his private bank; defending a property developer accused of conspiring to defraud mortgage providers of £2m; and defending client accused of an £8.5m mortgage fraud and international money laundering.

Serious crime: the firm has strength in depth and a significant run of successes, including five consective not guilty verdicts in murder cases.

The firm has developed a niche practice in the ever-expanding area of criminal confiscation and POCA work. Its expertise has proven invaluable in advising and defending clients in the field of restraint orders, asset recovery, criminal confiscation and enforcement. In the past year alone, the firm has handled more than a dozen confiscation cases where the benefit exceeds £1m.

The firm has an in-house POCA team to handle complex financial investigations, which frequently works alongside established firms of forensic accountants and has achieved a spectacular level of success in the field. The firm has demonstrated time and again that specialist knowledge, sheer hard work and a unique systemic approach can pay dividends for clients in moderating the impact of the government’s wide-ranging powers in confiscation cases. The firm negotiates settlements directly with prosecutors and consistently achieves favourable results for clients.

The firm’s two senior partners have more than 36 years’ experience in criminal defence work between them and have conducted the defence in some of the country’s largest and most high-profile prosecutions during that time. Cases include R v Regan (the longest murder trial ever at the Old Bailey); R v Wright & others (the UK’s biggest-ever cocaine importation); and R v Worboys (the ‘taxi rapist’). Solicitors at the firm advise and represent clients in investigations and proceedings across the board, and throughout the country. The team prides itself on its thoroughness and its dedication to its clients’ interests.

Number of UK partners 3
Number of other UK fee-earners 12

Above material supplied by Shearman Bowen & Co.

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • COUNCIL TAX

    In Harrow LBC v Ayiku [2012] EWHC 1200 (Admin) Sales J held that the word “or” in the Council Tax (Exempt Dwellings) Order 1992, art 3 Class N, had a disjunctive meaning, therefore it was sufficient for the non-British spouse of a foreign student to satisfy one or other of the two conditions, namely being prevented from taking paid employment or being prevented from claiming benefits, in order to qualify as a “relevant person” who was exempted from liability to pay council tax.
    - 11KBW
  • QUEEN’S SPEECH

    Bills already introduced pursuant to the Queen’s Speech on 9 May 2012 include Local Government Finance Bill and Electoral Registration and Administration Bill, both accompanied by Explanatory Notes, which in each case address ECHR compatibility.
    - 11KBW
  • Standards

    In R (Calver) v Adjudication Panel for Wales [2012] EWHC 1172 (Admin) Mr Calver was a member of Manorbier Community Council who successfully challenged the decision of the Panel to dismiss his appeal against a decision by Prembrokeshire County Council Standards Committee censuring him for a number of comments or blogs posted by him on a website he owned and controlled.
    - 11KBW
  • A justified retrospective

    Clive Sheldon - QC debates the pros & cons of retrospective tax legislation
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty (“PSED”)

    In R (Greenwich Community Law Centre) v Greenwich LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 496 the Court of Appeal held that the Council had had “due regard to the PSED when making changes to its funding of community legal advice services”. At para 30 Elias LJ said:
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty

    Surrey County Council conducted a review of its Library Service. This culminated in a Report to the Council’s Cabinet. The Recommendations in the Report included that there should be consultation about a community-partnership approach at selected Libraries.
    - 11KBW
  • Judicial Review

    The Judgment of Lindblom J in The Manydown Co Ltd v Basingstoke and Deane BC [2012] EWHC 977 (Admin) repays attention. The Claimant sought to challenge by judicial review 2 decisions of the Council: (1) the Council’s refusal to reconsider its position on the development of a site that it owns (and is the subject matter of a Joint Development Partnership Agreement with the Claimant); and (2) a decision of the Council’s Cabinet approving a selection of sites for development which did not include this site.
    - 11KBW
  • The Health and Social Care Act 2012: impact on adult social services

    After its torrid passage through Parliament, the Health and Social Care Bill received Royal Assent on 27 March 2012. The Act deals principally with healthcare reform, but it also contains some amendments to the legislative framework for social care. It will come into force on a day yet to be appointed by the Secretary of State.
    - 11KBW
  • Immigration update May 2012

    In this issue:
  • Premium service for tier 2 and 5 sponsors to be launched

    A premium service for sponsors will be launched by the UKBA on 6 April 2012. The service is designed specifically for companies that sponsor international employees under tier 2 and 5 of the points based system and aims to provide them with enhanced support.