The Legal 500

OCEAN FINANCIAL CENTRE, LEVEL 27, 10 COLLYER QUAY, SINGAPORE, 049315, SINGAPORE
Tel:
Work +65 6389 3000
Fax:
Fax +65 6389 3099
Web:
www.stamfordlaw.com.sg
Email:

Show all Press releases

Stamford Law advised Maxi-Cash, a leader and innovator in the Singapore pawnbroking industry, on...

June 2012

their initial public offering

Stamford Law advised on the listing of Maxi-Cash Financial Services Corporation, a leader and innovator in the Singapore pawnbroking industry on the SGX-ST Catalist, raising a significant amount of proceeds in the face of a volatile and difficult economic situation.  

A public offer of 56 million new shares at SGD0.30 each was made and an overwhelming response (especially in the case of the public retail offer, which was 88 times subscribed) was received. Maxi-Cash surged 30 per cent above its initial public offering price on its debut, closing at 39 cents. Over 85 million shares had changed hands, resulting in it being the third most traded stock by volume.

In an article published on Reuters.com, a local trader commented that: "There's a perception that Maxi-Cash's earnings may be more defensive because even during times of recession, the pawnbroking business will still do well."

Maxi-Cash, a subsidiary of the listed jeweller and property developer, Aspial Corp Ltd, is the first pawnbroker to debut on the Singapore bourse.


For more information please visit www.stamfordlaw.com.sg

Legal Developments by:
Stamford Law Corporation

  • Killing 2 Birds With 1 Stone: The Conceptual Double Derivative Action Comes to Life

    The separate legal entity doctrine means that a company can sue in its own name for a wrong done to it. Where a solvent company is unable to bring an action, its members can apply to do so. This was set out by the courts in several long standing decisions that set out the circumstances under which this would be allowed. This is known as the common law derivative action. In Singapore, the Companies Act was amended to provide for what has become known as a statutory derivative action where a private company incorporated in Singapore is involved. However, modern businesses are organised in groups of companies so that investors are shareholders in a holding company and businesses are run in wholly-owned subsidiaries. A deceptively simple question then arises - can a member of a holding company apply to court to take out a derivative law suit in the name a subsidiary where the member has no direct shareholding (termed a "double derivative action")? 
    - Stamford Law Corporation

Legal Developments in Singapore

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Killing 2 Birds With 1 Stone: The Conceptual Double Derivative Action Comes to Life

    The separate legal entity doctrine means that a company can sue in its own name for a wrong done to it. Where a solvent company is unable to bring an action, its members can apply to do so. This was set out by the courts in several long standing decisions that set out the circumstances under which this would be allowed. This is known as the common law derivative action. In Singapore, the Companies Act was amended to provide for what has become known as a statutory derivative action where a private company incorporated in Singapore is involved. However, modern businesses are organised in groups of companies so that investors are shareholders in a holding company and businesses are run in wholly-owned subsidiaries. A deceptively simple question then arises - can a member of a holding company apply to court to take out a derivative law suit in the name a subsidiary where the member has no direct shareholding (termed a "double derivative action")? 
  • Indonesia Releases New Investment Laws on Public Companies

    On 8 April 2013, the Indonesian Investment Coordination Board ( BKPM ) issued the new BKPM Regulation No. 5 of 2013 on the Guidelines and Procedures for Licensing and Non-Licensing in relation to Capital Investments ( Regulation 5/2013 ), which generally deals with foreign and domestic investments in public companies and their subsidiaries in Indonesia. Regulation 5/2013 was promulgated in the State Gazette on 12 April 2013 and took effect on 27 May 2013.
  • MYANMAR’S FOREIGN INVESTMENT LAW 2012: A SHORT COMMENTARY

    On 2 November 2012, President Thein Sein signed into law Myanmar’s new Foreign Investment Law (the new FIL), replacing the previous Union of Myanmar Foreign Investment Law of 1988. Pursuant to the new FIL, the Foreign Investment Rules and the Classification of Types of Economic Activities Notification (collectively, the Rules) were published on 31 January 2013. The Rules provide further guidance on the new FIL by expanding upon the rights and duties of foreign investors under the new FIL, as well as clarifying the types of activities for which foreign investment is prohibited or restricted.
  • Competition Appeal Board Dismisses Most Grounds of Appeal by Modelling Agencies

    On 10 April 2013, the Competition Appeal Board (CAB) dismissed all but two grounds of appeal by five modelling agencies that had been found by the Competition Commission of Singapore (CCS) to have engaged in price-fixing activities. CAB's decision resulted in a reduction in the total amount of financial penalties for the five modelling agencies.
  • COMPETITION ASSESSMENT OF THE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY MARKET IN SINGAPORE: CCS DECIDES THAT...

    NO IMMEDIATE ACTION IS NECESSARY
  • SINGAPORE FINES 12 MOTOR VEHICLE TRADERS FOR BID-RIGGING AT PUBLIC AUCTIONS

    On 28 March 2013, the Competition Commission of Singapore ("CCS") handed down fines totalling S$179,071 on 12 motor vehicle traders for bidrigging at public motor vehicle auctions held by various government agencies
  • MAS RESPONDS TO FEEDBACK ON ITS CONSULTATION TO DESIGNATE TAX CRIMES AS MONEY LAUNDERING...

    PREDICATE OFFENCES
  • Consultation on the recommendations of the Financial Advisory Industry Review

    On 26 March 2012, the Monetary Authority of Singapore ("MAS") announced the launch of the Financial Advisory Industry Review ("FAIR"), with the aim of raising standards of practice in the financial advisory ("FA") industry and improving efficiency in the distribution of life insurance and investment products in Singapore. Subsequently, a panel, chaired by MAS and comprising representatives from industry associations, consumer and investor bodies, academia, media, and other stakeholders ("FAIR Panel"), was formed on 2 April 2012 to conduct the review.
  • Sweeping changes to the Computer Misuse Act

    The Computer Misuse Act has been renamed the Computer Misuse and Cybersecurity Act. The name change is only the first sign of the myriad of changes within the body of the Act, with new provisions giving the Government “sweeping powers over cyberspace”. The wording of the law now allows a very broad interpretation of the circumstances in which the Government may exercise such “sweeping powers” to order "measures and requirements... as may be necessary...
  • Shin Khai Construction Pte Ltd v FL Wong Construction Pte Ltd [2013] SGHCR 04

    In the case of Shin Khai Construction Pte Ltd v FL Wong Construction Pte Ltd, the Learned Assistant Registrar Jordan Tan AR (“the learned AR”) had to consider the novel question of whether an adjudication determination may be set aside on the ground that the adjudication application was lodged later that the period of entitlement stipulated by s 13(3)(a) of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act (Cap 30B, 2006 Rev Ed) (“the Act”).