The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon
Work +91 11 46667000

Show all Press releases

Jindal Rail Infrastructure Limited wins INR 18.35 Crores plus Interest in Arbitration against Union

March 2019

Jindal Rail Infrastructure Limited wins INR 18.35 Crores plus Interest in Arbitration against Union of India, Ministry of Railways

The Final Award dated 01.03.2019 has now been pronounced by the Sole Arbitrator, Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.K. Patnaik, Former Judge of Supreme Court of India. The Hon’ble Tribunal decided the dispute which arose between M/s Jindal Rail Infrastructure Limited (“Jindal Rail”) and the Union of India, Ministry of Railways (“Indian Railways”).

The S&A Team led by Mr. Manoj K Singh, Founding Partner, and Mr. Nilava Bandyopadhyay, Sr. Partner advised and represented Jindal Rail in the arbitration.

The arbitration was related to the dispute for supply of wagons to the Railways. The Indian Railways is the only entity which purchases wagons in bulk quantities and a prospective wagon manufacturer has to be certified by the Research Design and Standards Organizations (RDSO). The Jindal Rail is certified by the RDSO and it became a regular supplier manufacturing and supplying various types of wagons to Indian Railways. As a regular supplier, Jindal Rail participated in the tender process floated by the Indian Railways and became L1 and accordingly, as per the formula of the bidding document was awarded the Contract. As per the bidding document, the entire tender quantity of wagons was to be distributed to the eligible tenderer based on their past performances and also as per L1, L2 and L3. However, as per the law, rules and prevalent practices of the Indian Railways, all the other eligible tenders were to match the L1 price while getting their respective quantities. The Contract also provides for the exercise of 30% Option clause in favour of Indian Railways, by which it can increase or decrease the awarded quantity of wagons. Jindal Rail raised a dispute with Indian Railways, being aggrieved by mainly two acts of Indian Railways, i.e., awarding a tender to L2 bidders at L2 rate, which was much higher than the L1 rate and wrong and illegal exercise of 30% Option clause by the Indian Railways.

The Hon’ble Tribunal after perusal of the pleadings, and evidence led by the parties arrived at the conclusion that the Indian Railways have committed a breach of the contract by purchasing 496 wagons BOXNHL wagons from Jindal Rail at a lower price than the market price. Thus, the Indian Railways are liable to compensate Jindal Rail for the loss or damage caused to Jindal Rail for such breach under Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act 1872. The Hon’ble Tribunal has duly held that in either case of a breach of contract or for enjoying the benefit of a non-gratuitous act, the quantum of compensation has to be paid by the party who has enjoyed the luxury of the act i.e. Indian Railways.

This award is a first-of-its-kind and has duly dealt with the regular scenario within the railway industry, wherein the contractor does not have any option other than to abide by the in terrorem clauses as the railway enjoys the sole monopoly amongst the wagon manufacturers. The award will boost the morale of the contractors working in the railway industry as the same is tantamount to a victory over the arbitrariness of the Railway Industry.

Legal Developments by:
Singh & Associates Founder – Manoj K Singh Advocates and Solicitors


    - Singh & Associates Founder – Manoj K Singh A

Legal Developments in India

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Sulphur Cap Ahead - Regulatory

    Sulphur Cap Ahead - Regulatory
  • GTDT Shipping - India

    Mr Shardul Thacker heads the shipping, oil and gas and banking practice group at Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe. Lloyd’s List ranked him third in their top 10 lawyers stating: “Highly regarded for his work in the liquefied natural gas sector, particularly for interesting and highly geared finance deals in relation to infrastructure projects, energy, ports and ships.” india_-_gtdt_shipping_
  • Chambers Guides - Insurance 2018 - India

    India is a common-law jurisdiction. In general, Indian laws borrow heavily from, and are based on, English law. However, insurance law in India has certain unique features that deviate from English insurance law. The primary legislation of insurance law in India is the Insurance Act, 1938 (the “Insurance Act”) and the Insurance Rules, 1939 (the “Insurance Rules”).
  • Transport Finance Review - India

    The transportation industry – aviation, shipping and rail – has been predominantly owned by government entities since India’s independence in 1947. Air India and Indian Airlines, both government-owned, rules the skies; the Shipping Corporation of India (SCI), established in 1961 and owned by the government, owns and operates around one-third of the Indian tonnage. All railway property is government owned.
  • International Arbitration Review - India

    The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) provides the framework for arbitration and conciliation in India. Drafted on the basis of the UNCITRAL Model Law, it is divided into four parts. Each part governs a different aspect of the arbitration and conciliation process: a Part 1 governs commercial arbitration; b Part 2 governs the enforcement of certain foreign awards; c Part 3 governs conciliation; and d Part 4 contains supplementary provisions (regarding the power of the court to make rulings, etc.). The Act 2 was recently amended in 2016 with an aim to make it more robust by plugging the lacunae that existed in the original legislation.
  • ICLG Shipping law 2018 - India

  • India - Chambers Guides - Shipping 2018

    The ‘Law & Practice’ sections provide easily accessible information on navigating the legal system when conducting business in the jurisdiction. Leading lawyers explain local law and practice at key transactional stages and for crucial aspects of doing business.

  • Post Marketing Surveillance of Drugs

    Post marketing surveillance is performed after market approval/clinical trials of drugs in India. The regulatory framework for conducting clinical trials of drugs is provided under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 (“ Act ”) and the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 (“ Rules ”). Further, Part X-A and Schedule Y of the Rules specifically deal with the statutory provisions applicable for clinical trial of drugs in India. Schedule Y divides Clinical trial of drugs into 4 Phases, namely, Human Pharmacology (Phase-I), Therapeutic exploratory trials (Phase-II), Therapeutic confirmatory trials (Phase III) and Post Marketing Trials (Phase-IV).
  • Protection of Biotechnology under Indian Laws

    According to the eighth annual survey conducted by the Association of Biotechnology-Led Enterprises (ABLE) and Bio Spectrum, the Indian biotech industry grew threefold in just five years to report revenues of US$ 3 billion in 2009-10, a rise of 17 per cent over the previous year. Maintaining the momentum of the previous years, the Indian biotech industry grew 16.28 per cent in FY2014; the total industry size was US$ 5 billion at the end of the financial year and it reached US$ 7 billion in FY2015. Fast-paced growth is likely to continue; the industry is expected to increase in size to USD11.6 billion by 2017, driven by a range   of factors such as growing demand, intensive R & D activities and strong government initiatives ( )