The Legal 500

Back to Legal500 home

Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP

ADELAIDE HOUSE, LONDON BRIDGE, LONDON, EC4R 9HA, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 3400 1000
Fax:
Fax 020 3400 1111
DX:
92 LONDON CHANCERY LANE WC2
Web:
www.blplaw.com
Email:
Tel Aviv, Singapore, Paris, Moscow, London, Hong Kong and 4 more

David Leibowitz

Tel:
Work +44 20 3400 2109
Email:
Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP

Work Department

Restructuring and insolvency.

Position

David acts for banks, IPs, creditors, directors, the Insolvency Service and foreign lawyers on both domestic and cross-border insolvencies. He has extensive experience in enforcement of security, corporate insolvencies, defending office holders from creditor challenges, directors' disqualification proceedings, directors' duties, transactional avoidance, tracing claims, civil aspects of commercial fraud and asset recovery. He has particular expertise in restructuring and insolvency assignments in the insurance and financial services industries. David lectures regularly on domestic and cross-border insolvency. He is a CEDR accredited mediator and is currently a member of both the R3 Education Committee and the CBI Insolvency Panel. He is recognised by both 'Chambers' and 'The Legal 500' as a leading practitioner in insolvency law.

Career

Qualified 1986; assistant solicitor Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP 1986-92, partner 1992 to date.

Member

INSOL; Insolvency Lawyer's Association; R3; CEDR.

Education

University of Exeter (1983 LLB Hons); College of Law, London.

Leisure

Music, tennis, hiking.

Practice Areas

Insolvency and corporate recovery

Back to index

Search News and Articles

Legal Developments by:
Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to

  • Jersey Royal Court considers measure of damages for dilapidations claims

    In the absence of any statutory provision in Jersey addressing how dilapidations claims are to be quantified, the Royal Court's decision in JSSL v Barclays has provided some much needed guidance, particularly in circumstances where there is an acceptance that works to redress dilapidations have not been and will not be carried out.
    - Ogier

  • English Supreme Court rules on Mistake and Hastings Bass

    On 9 May 2013 the English Supreme Court handed down a unanimous judgment on the seminal cases of Pitt-v- Holt and Futter -v- Futter , with Lord Walker's valedictory judgment conclusively resolving the English position on the rule in Hastings Bass and rescission on the ground of mistake.
    - Ogier

  • Getting the breaks

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
    - Falcon Chambers

  • Product liability and dietary supplements

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
    - Shook, Hardy & Bacon International LLP

  • The calm before 
the storm: are 
you prepared for 
a dawn raid?

    WilmerHale currently authors the Fraud and Corporate Crime section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
    - WilmerHale

  • International shipment of waste: transporters beware

    Burges Salmon LLP currently authors the Environment and Energy section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here
    - Burges Salmon LLP

  • Cyprus Shipping Industry : Business as usual. Why despite recent events Cyprus remains an internatio

    Cyprus is the third most populated island in the Mediterranean Sea. It is strategically located at the crossroads of Europe, Africa and the Middle East. Traditionally Cyprus has always been at the heart of the seafaring trade and therefore always functioned as an important centre for trade and commerce. Today as a member of the European Union it remains an optimal business base. It is one of the most attractive locations for foreign investments worldwide. Foreign companies have been given the opportunity to invest and establish business in Cyprus on equal terms with local investors as no distinction is made between foreign and Cypriot companies.
    - Michael Kyprianou & Co

  • FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

    The excellent support system in combination with the ideal jurisdiction provided in Cyprus set the country in the list of the most desirable countries through which you can offer foreign exchange operations. In addition, the accession of Cyprus within the European Union and, most importantly, the extremely beneficial economic advantages available due to the low costs and the outstanding taxation, create a covetable environment for foreign investors.
    - Michael Kyprianou & Co

  • National public order. Adoption of the Draft

    The Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation (hereinafter - SCC RF) adopted by the Informative Letter No. 156 dated the 26th of February, 2013 (hereinafter - the Informative Letter) on Review of the consideration by arbitrazh courts of the cases on the implementation of the public order clause as the ground for rejection of the recognition and enforcement of the foreign court decisions and arbitral awards.
    - Lidings Law Firm

  • China Customs New Interpretation

    For many products, tariff classification can be technically complex, confusing, and subject to multiple interpretations. Often several different Harmonized System Codes ("HS Code") may seem applicable for one given product with different tariff rates. Tariff classification is indeed a process of application of customs classification rules, including customs rulings and decisions, and misclassification may trigger severe legal consequences. The sad fact is, unfortunately, that many companies rely on non-legal professionals to determine the HS Codes for imports or exports. A recent interpretation issued by the General Administration of Customs of China ("GACC") (Circular No. [2012] 495 Shu-Fa-Fa) (the "Interpretation") reinforces the process of tariff classification as a legal matter, and formulates the test as to what counts for regulatory violation if tariff classification rules are improperly applied by the importer or exporter in a given case. If the legal defense is successful, misclassification may only be treated as a non-violation misclassification, with the possible obligation to pay up additional customs duties, if any, but without administrative or criminal consequences. The Interpretation took effect as from February 1, 2013.
    - Haoliwen Partners
© 2013 www.legal500.com