The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Broad & Bright

Work +86 10 8513 1818
Fax +86 10 8513 1919
Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, Shanghai

Jun Ji

Work +8610 85131818
Broad & Bright

Work Department



Mr. Ji’s areas of focus include Litigation & Arbitration, Intellectual Property, Foreign Direct Investment and M&A. Mr. Ji has had extensive experience and success in litigation and arbitration, especially in cases involving intellectual property rights. In 2005, he won a trademark infringement suit on behalf of a Japanese company against four notable Chinese enterprises. The PRC’s Supreme People’s Court held the Chinese enterprises liable for trademark infringement, awarding Mr. Ji’s client 8.3 million RMB (1.1 million USD) in damages, which Mr. Ji’s team was able to successfully collect in full. This case was the largest amount of damages ever awarded to a foreign company for trademark infringement in China. For this remarkable achievement, Broad & Bright was granted the “Asia-Pacific Trademark Case 2008 Award” by Managing IP, a leading international magazine on Intellectual Property. In 2007, Mr. Ji represented a large Japanese electrical manufacturer against five domestic companies in an unfair competition case regarding imitation of industrial designs. The judgment was the first in China to base its decision on the PRC’s Anti-Unfair Competition Law for protection of industrial designs, opening up a new path for protection of industrial designs. During the 2009 global financial crisis, Mr. Ji successfully recovered over 10 million USD for U.S. creditors in China. He also headed contract and negotiations for a joint venture project, valued at 7 billion USD, between a large Japanese heavy industry company and a Chinese counterpart. In the field of M&A, Mr. Ji handled a transnational merger and acquisition case in 2003, transacting nearly 1 billion USD, the largest transaction by volume that year in China. Mr. Ji continues to be engaged in a variety of M&A deals on behalf of international clients.


Mr. Ji is one of the founding partners of Broad & Bright. From 1994-1997 he was an associate with Mori Hamada & Matsumoto in Tokyo, and practiced with Kirkland & Ellis LLP in their Los Angeles office from 1998 to 2000. Before founding Broad & Bright in 2004, Mr. Ji was a partner at Zhongzi Law Office in Beijing.


Chinese, English and Japanese


National Bar of China, State Bar of New York.


Mr. Ji received his LL.B degree from Peking University in 1991. He also holds two LL.M degrees from the University of Tokyo Law School (1997) and Harvard Law School (1998), respectively.


Mr. Ji is currently a member of the Japanese Intellectual Property Association. The Protection of Patent Rights under China’s New Patent Law: Introducing Issues Concerning Application of Law on Reducing Pre-litigation Patent Infringements , International Commercial Business, Volume 29, No.10 of 2001 New Developments in Trademark Protection Laws in China, International Commercial Business, Volume 30, No.12 of 2002 Regulations of Work-For-Hire Invention in China, ActeB Review, No.5 Review of the Supreme People’s Court of the PRC’s Judgments on Trademark Infringement in Favor of a Foreign Companies, (Co-authored) Published on Jurist of Japan (2007) No. 1343 Review of the Supreme People’s Court of the PRC’s Decision on Yamaha Motor Co.’s Trademark Infringement Case, (Co-authored) Published on New Business Law (NBL) of Japan (2007) No. 864

China: Corporate and M&A

PRC firms

Within: PRC firms

Broad & Bright fields a number of highly regarded practitioners: David Wang is ‘an excellent counsel who helps to navigate the sometimes difficult coasts of Chinese Law’; Jun Ji is praised for his ‘powerful and customer-oriented service’; Libin Zhang has ‘excellent energy sector knowledge’; and Roland Sun is ‘a strong rising star’. Recent instructions include divestment and Sino-foreign joint venture.

[back to top]

Back to index

Legal Developments in China

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • What is the relationship between PPP and concessions?

    From fledgling concessions to PPP that is sweeping the country today, there are two major sets of regulations to be followed: one being regulations for concessions led by the National Development and Reform Commission (“NDRC”) and the other the series of regulations for PPP led by the Ministry of Finance (“MoF”).  However, to date, there is still not one law that expressly defines the relationship between the two, resulting in much confusion and many impediments in practice.  The relationship between concessions and PPP is an issue currently desperately needing clarification.
  • Thought on Developing Convention on Enforceability of Settlement Agreements Reached Through Concilia

    The UN Commission on International Trade Law (“UNCITRAL”) held its 47th session in New York on 7-18 July 2014 and the Author had the privilege of attending the conference at invitation of Mr. Yu Jianlong, President of the Asia Pacific Regional Arbitration Group (“APRAG”). During the conference, the U.S. Government submitted a proposal suggesting Working Group II (Arbitration and Conciliation) of UNCITRAL (“Working Group II”) to develop a multilateral convention with respect of the enforceability of international commercial settlement agreements reached through conciliation (“Enforceability Convention”) for the purpose of encouraging the use of conciliation in resolving international commercial disputes.  Read more
  • Impact of Article 43 of the Commercial Bank Law on PPP Projects

    With the widespread use of the PPP model in China, financing channels for PPP projects have also increasingly diversified.  Bank, trust, fund and insurance channels of capital have all rushed onto the stage of project financing. Subject to Article 43 of the Commercial Bank Law, banks, as the traditional big brother of financing, have always played the role of lender.  In practice, the opinions as to whether they can participate in the bidding on, and contributing capital to, PPP projects as private investors have been mixed.

    The current PPP tide in China driven by the Ministry of Finance and the National Development and Reform Commission witnesses the transformation and upgrading of large state-owned enterprises.  These enterprises that have traditionally only been familiar with bid invitation, bid submission, and construction, have started to have an impact on numerous new areas such as project proposal and planning, company establishment and acquisition, fund establishment and operation, etc.  Certain state-owned enterprises that got their starts fairly early have cultivated teams with extensive experience in investing, and certain enterprises that are just starting up are selecting young talent from various entities in all out effort to catch up.  Private enterprises also participate enthusiastically.
  • Transfer Pricing – New Risks in Declaring Price Impact of Special Relationship to China Customs

    China Customs recently requires that the importer or exporter of record declare the impact on the import or export price of its special relationship with the counterpart (“Price Impact”). Specifically the declaring party must state whether its special relationship, if any, would affect the transaction value or price as declared to the China Customs. Previously the special relationship was an item of declaration subsequent to a specific request from the Customs. However, the impact of the special relationship was not an item of declaration, and the declaration party even had a general defense right to disprove such Price Impact. The Price Impact, if any, has been a pre-condition for  the Customs not to accept the declared transfer price for the purpose of ascertaining dutiable price of a given import or export shipment, in which case, China Customs shall re-value the given shipment according to China customs valuation rules.
  • New China Customs Taxation Policy on Cross-Border B2C E-Commerce Imports

    The Ministry of Finance, General Administration of Customs and State Administration of Taxation of China jointly issued a circular (“Joint Circular ”) relating to the taxation policy on the cross-border e-commerce retailing imports, with effect as from April 8, 2016.
  • ICC and CIETAC Arbitration Practice Comparison - Case Study Note 1

    One of the most important negotiated points by parties in contract negotiations is the dispute resolution clause. If parties agree on arbitration, they often negotiate which arbitration institution or arbitration rules will apply in resolving potential disputes.
  • Interpretation of New Anti-monopoly Provisions in the Field of Intellectual Property Rights:

    Ren Qing and Wu Peng, Partners in Zhong Lun Law Firm

    By Steve Zhao
  • Zhong Lun Advises Chinese Consortium on $1.9 Billion Acquisition of OmniVision Technologies, Inc.

    On April 30, 2015, OmniVision Technologies, Inc. (OVTI, a Delaware company listed on NASDAQ) announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to be acquired by a consortium composed of Hua Capital Management Co. Ltd. (“Hua Capital Management”), CITIC Capital Holdings Limited (“CITIC Capital”) and GoldStone Investment Co. Ltd. (“GoldStone Investment”) (collectively, the “Consortium”). Under the terms of the agreement, OmniVision stockholders will receive $29.75 per share in cash, or a total of approximately $1.9 billion. The agreement was unanimously approved by OmniVision’s Board of Directors.