The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Broad & Bright

701 CBD INTERNATIONAL PLAZA, NO.16 YONG'ANDONGLI, JIANGUOMENWAI AVENUE, CHAOYANG DISTRICT, BEIJING 100022, CHINA
Tel:
Work +86 10 8513 1818
Fax:
Fax +86 10 8513 1919
Email:
Web:
www.broadbright.com
Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, Shanghai

The firm

Broad & Bright is a full-service Chinese law firm providing a broad range of specialised legal services in multiple practice areas for domestic and international clients, with particular expertise and outstanding achievements in cross-border business transactions.

Since its inception in 2004, the firm has been providing clients with legal services at the top international standard. Its professional training and hands-on experience in cross-border transactions are evident in the creative, yet soundly practical, solutions the firm offers. Maintaining partnerships with law firms abroad and drawing on the advice of legal specialists within and outside of China, it is confident that its solutions will work for clients.

Areas of practice

The corporate and commercial team possesses extensive, in-depth knowledge and experience in advising on important and complicated corporate legal issues. The firm has advised many Chinese and foreign companies on establishing a business presence and on their operations.

The firm offers comprehensive M&A services for companies and organisations, both Chinese and foreign. The firm has represented buyers, targets, lenders, financial advisors and other participants in complex M&A transactions.

With China’s participation in global trade now recognised as a major factor in the continued growth and stabilisation of a global economy, the firm’s lawyers have won a hard-earned place at the forefront of international trade practice. Providing a whole spectrum of legal services in this area, Broad & Bright has been a pioneer in responding to anti-dumping and countervailing suits. For example, its trade lawyers represented the Chinese government in the first countervailing proceedings against China, which was initiated by the Canadian government.

Dispute resolution is one of the mainstays of Broad & Bright’s legal services. Its lawyers have successfully represented multinational companies, financial institutions, large state-owned enterprises, private enterprises and other entities in hearings and trials before the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission, the Supreme People’s Court, the provincial high people’s courts and other tribunals.

Private equity and venture capital is also one of Broad & Bright’s major practice areas. Its comprehensive services cover all stages of investment, from initial start-up and seed investments to later stages of growth and mature investments.

The firm’s efforts and dedication contribute to the continued success of its banking and trust practice. It covers and specialises in a variety of financial legal services that range from project finance, leveraged acquisition finance and mezzanine finance to off-balance-sheet finance and trade finance, and compliance and regulatory affairs for financial institutions operating in China.

The firm is actively involved in domestic and international capital market transactions. By leveraging its expertise in mergers and acquisitions, it represents clients acquiring shares and investing in PRC-listed companies or pre-IPO companies.

The volume of intellectual property cases the firm has handled has allowed it to build an extensive intellectual property practice, specialising in dispute resolution and protection of clients’ rights through administrative, civil and criminal procedures.

The employment and social benefits team provides clients with legal advice, counseling and representation in arbitration and litigation in connection with all aspects of employment, benefits and labour laws. Its attorneys are experienced in assisting foreign and Chinese companies with establishing and implementing employment and HR systems in China, and in advising clients on a wide array of issues.

The firm’s real estate lawyers advise clients on all phases of real estate investment, development, financing and operations.

The firm is involved in the dynamic carbon trading and new energy markets. It advises on buying and selling CERs and VERs, implementation of CDM projects, carbon trading, energy efficiency projects, and development of alternative energies in China.

LanguagesChinese
English
Japanese
Korean

Other officesShanghai
Guangzhou
Hong Kong
Tokyo
Los Angeles

Number of lawyers 100

Above material supplied by Broad & Bright.

Legal Developments in China

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • What is the relationship between PPP and concessions?

    From fledgling concessions to PPP that is sweeping the country today, there are two major sets of regulations to be followed: one being regulations for concessions led by the National Development and Reform Commission (“NDRC”) and the other the series of regulations for PPP led by the Ministry of Finance (“MoF”).  However, to date, there is still not one law that expressly defines the relationship between the two, resulting in much confusion and many impediments in practice.  The relationship between concessions and PPP is an issue currently desperately needing clarification.
  • Thought on Developing Convention on Enforceability of Settlement Agreements Reached Through Concilia

    The UN Commission on International Trade Law (“UNCITRAL”) held its 47th session in New York on 7-18 July 2014 and the Author had the privilege of attending the conference at invitation of Mr. Yu Jianlong, President of the Asia Pacific Regional Arbitration Group (“APRAG”). During the conference, the U.S. Government submitted a proposal suggesting Working Group II (Arbitration and Conciliation) of UNCITRAL (“Working Group II”) to develop a multilateral convention with respect of the enforceability of international commercial settlement agreements reached through conciliation (“Enforceability Convention”) for the purpose of encouraging the use of conciliation in resolving international commercial disputes.  Read more
  • Impact of Article 43 of the Commercial Bank Law on PPP Projects

    With the widespread use of the PPP model in China, financing channels for PPP projects have also increasingly diversified.  Bank, trust, fund and insurance channels of capital have all rushed onto the stage of project financing. Subject to Article 43 of the Commercial Bank Law, banks, as the traditional big brother of financing, have always played the role of lender.  In practice, the opinions as to whether they can participate in the bidding on, and contributing capital to, PPP projects as private investors have been mixed.
  • A LOOK BACK AND THOUGHTS ON PPP LEGAL PRACTICE IN CHINA IN 2015

    The current PPP tide in China driven by the Ministry of Finance and the National Development and Reform Commission witnesses the transformation and upgrading of large state-owned enterprises.  These enterprises that have traditionally only been familiar with bid invitation, bid submission, and construction, have started to have an impact on numerous new areas such as project proposal and planning, company establishment and acquisition, fund establishment and operation, etc.  Certain state-owned enterprises that got their starts fairly early have cultivated teams with extensive experience in investing, and certain enterprises that are just starting up are selecting young talent from various entities in all out effort to catch up.  Private enterprises also participate enthusiastically.
  • Transfer Pricing – New Risks in Declaring Price Impact of Special Relationship to China Customs

    China Customs recently requires that the importer or exporter of record declare the impact on the import or export price of its special relationship with the counterpart (“Price Impact”). Specifically the declaring party must state whether its special relationship, if any, would affect the transaction value or price as declared to the China Customs. Previously the special relationship was an item of declaration subsequent to a specific request from the Customs. However, the impact of the special relationship was not an item of declaration, and the declaration party even had a general defense right to disprove such Price Impact. The Price Impact, if any, has been a pre-condition for  the Customs not to accept the declared transfer price for the purpose of ascertaining dutiable price of a given import or export shipment, in which case, China Customs shall re-value the given shipment according to China customs valuation rules.
  • New China Customs Taxation Policy on Cross-Border B2C E-Commerce Imports

    The Ministry of Finance, General Administration of Customs and State Administration of Taxation of China jointly issued a circular (“Joint Circular ”) relating to the taxation policy on the cross-border e-commerce retailing imports, with effect as from April 8, 2016.
  • ICC and CIETAC Arbitration Practice Comparison - Case Study Note 1

    One of the most important negotiated points by parties in contract negotiations is the dispute resolution clause. If parties agree on arbitration, they often negotiate which arbitration institution or arbitration rules will apply in resolving potential disputes.
  • Interpretation of New Anti-monopoly Provisions in the Field of Intellectual Property Rights:

    Ren Qing and Wu Peng, Partners in Zhong Lun Law Firm
  • POTENTIAL CHANGE OF CHINA’S FOREIGN INVESTMENT LAWS AND ITS EFFECT ON VIE STRUCTURES

    By Steve Zhao
  • Zhong Lun Advises Chinese Consortium on $1.9 Billion Acquisition of OmniVision Technologies, Inc.

    On April 30, 2015, OmniVision Technologies, Inc. (OVTI, a Delaware company listed on NASDAQ) announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to be acquired by a consortium composed of Hua Capital Management Co. Ltd. (“Hua Capital Management”), CITIC Capital Holdings Limited (“CITIC Capital”) and GoldStone Investment Co. Ltd. (“GoldStone Investment”) (collectively, the “Consortium”). Under the terms of the agreement, OmniVision stockholders will receive $29.75 per share in cash, or a total of approximately $1.9 billion. The agreement was unanimously approved by OmniVision’s Board of Directors.