The Legal 500

Berrymans Lace Mawer LLP

CASTLE CHAMBERS, 43 CASTLE STREET, LIVERPOOL, L2 9SU, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 0151 236 2002
Fax:
Fax 0151 236 2585
DX:
14159 LIVERPOOL-1
Web:
www.blm-law.com
Email:

Berrymans Lace Mawer LLP (BLM) is one of the largest litigation law firms in the country – 95% of its turnover relates to the resolution of disputes. It provides advice to a broad range of commercial and public sector clients, including insurance companies, FTSE 100 companies, small and medium enterprises, local authorities, medical defence organisations, police authorities, professional service organisations, government departments, universities and other public sector institutions, as well as clients in the not-for-profit sector.

The firm: BLM’s services are integrated across nine UK offices in Birmingham, Bristol, Cardiff, Leeds, Liverpool, London, Manchester, Southampton and Stockton on Tees. All BLM offices work closely together to ensure clients receive a seamless service. The firm is over 1,300 strong, with 146 partners and more than 590 additional legal professionals. Despite its tremendous growth in recent years, it has managed to retain its approachable style and friendly working atmosphere.

BLM’s foremost objective is to help its clients gain the competitive edge – the firm does this by being totally focused on the needs of its clients’ markets. This means looking beyond the immediate legal issues to develop the best all-round practical and commercial solutions. BLM’s established policy development unit acts as a conduit between government, policy makers and clients, to provide briefings on government reforms and consultations. The team helps to shape the policy agenda and update clients on issues affecting their operations before they arise. BLM also offers a highly successful lawyer-led claims management service, and clients are also provided with a legal risk solution consultancy product, which trains and advises on risk and the prevention of claims and litigation.

Types of work undertaken: The firm operates in almost 50 areas of law, grouped broadly into nine market sectors: insurance and indemnity, construction and property, business services, healthcare, leisure, retail, public sector, transport, and media and technology.

Many partners play an active role in professional and industry bodies that are shaping the legal landscape. Partners take a leading role in the Forum of Insurance Lawyers (including BLM partner Michelle Penn, who is the Law Society representative for FOIL), and sit on the Law Society’s Civil Litigation Committee, Court of Appeal Users’ Group, as Deputy District Judges and the Law Society’s Clinical Negligence Reference Group.

BLM is regularly involved in test cases and high-profile litigation on behalf of its clients, including the Supreme Court case of Willmore v Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council (liability for mesothelioma) and Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Ltd & ors (the first noise induced hearing loss claim to reach the Supreme Court), as well as the Court of Appeal EL Trigger Litigation (resolving disputes concerning the definition of the ‘trigger’ event in employers’ liability policies relating to mesothelioma claims). The firm also acted in the professional negligence Supreme Court case of Jones v Kaney (in which the court abolished the immunity afforded to expert witnesses from claims for negligence arising out of evidence prepared for the purposes of legal proceedings).

More information about BLM can be found on its website: www.blm-law.com.

Other offices: Birmingham, Bristol, Cardiff, Leeds, Southampton, Stockton on Tees

Breakdown of work %
Business services 10
Construction and property 10
Insurance and indemnity 40
Leisure 5
Media and technology 5
Public sector 15
Retail 5
Transport 5
Healthcare 5

Number of UK partners 146
Number of other UK fee-earners 594

Above material supplied by Berrymans Lace Mawer LLP.

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • COUNCIL TAX

    In Harrow LBC v Ayiku [2012] EWHC 1200 (Admin) Sales J held that the word “or” in the Council Tax (Exempt Dwellings) Order 1992, art 3 Class N, had a disjunctive meaning, therefore it was sufficient for the non-British spouse of a foreign student to satisfy one or other of the two conditions, namely being prevented from taking paid employment or being prevented from claiming benefits, in order to qualify as a “relevant person” who was exempted from liability to pay council tax.
    - 11KBW
  • QUEEN’S SPEECH

    Bills already introduced pursuant to the Queen’s Speech on 9 May 2012 include Local Government Finance Bill and Electoral Registration and Administration Bill, both accompanied by Explanatory Notes, which in each case address ECHR compatibility.
    - 11KBW
  • Standards

    In R (Calver) v Adjudication Panel for Wales [2012] EWHC 1172 (Admin) Mr Calver was a member of Manorbier Community Council who successfully challenged the decision of the Panel to dismiss his appeal against a decision by Prembrokeshire County Council Standards Committee censuring him for a number of comments or blogs posted by him on a website he owned and controlled.
    - 11KBW
  • A justified retrospective

    Clive Sheldon - QC debates the pros & cons of retrospective tax legislation
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty (“PSED”)

    In R (Greenwich Community Law Centre) v Greenwich LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 496 the Court of Appeal held that the Council had had “due regard to the PSED when making changes to its funding of community legal advice services”. At para 30 Elias LJ said:
    - 11KBW
  • Public Sector Equality Duty

    Surrey County Council conducted a review of its Library Service. This culminated in a Report to the Council’s Cabinet. The Recommendations in the Report included that there should be consultation about a community-partnership approach at selected Libraries.
    - 11KBW
  • Judicial Review

    The Judgment of Lindblom J in The Manydown Co Ltd v Basingstoke and Deane BC [2012] EWHC 977 (Admin) repays attention. The Claimant sought to challenge by judicial review 2 decisions of the Council: (1) the Council’s refusal to reconsider its position on the development of a site that it owns (and is the subject matter of a Joint Development Partnership Agreement with the Claimant); and (2) a decision of the Council’s Cabinet approving a selection of sites for development which did not include this site.
    - 11KBW
  • The Health and Social Care Act 2012: impact on adult social services

    After its torrid passage through Parliament, the Health and Social Care Bill received Royal Assent on 27 March 2012. The Act deals principally with healthcare reform, but it also contains some amendments to the legislative framework for social care. It will come into force on a day yet to be appointed by the Secretary of State.
    - 11KBW
  • Immigration update May 2012

    In this issue:
  • Premium service for tier 2 and 5 sponsors to be launched

    A premium service for sponsors will be launched by the UKBA on 6 April 2012. The service is designed specifically for companies that sponsor international employees under tier 2 and 5 of the points based system and aims to provide them with enhanced support.