The Legal 500

Stephenson Harwood

1 FINSBURY CIRCUS, LONDON, EC2M 7SH, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7329 4422
Fax:
Fax 020 7329 7100
DX:
64 CHANCERY LANE WC2
Web:
www.shlegal.com
Email:
Singapore, Shanghai, Piraeus, Paris, London, Hong Kong and 2 more

Andrew Edge

Tel:
Work +44 20 7809 2102
Email:
Stephenson Harwood

Work Department

Corporate.

Position

Andrew is a corporate partner who advises on public and private M&A, joint ventures and equity fundraisings. Andrew was the lead partner working on the deal that was shortlisted for corporate deal of the year 2010/11 by 'Legal Business' magazine. Andrew has been named by The Lawyer Magazine as one of the 'hot 100' lawyers for 2012 and was awarded the ILO client choice award for M&A 2012. Prior to joining Stephenson Harwood in 2010, Andrew was partner for eight years in another major international law firm. Transactions on which Andrew has advised include: Piramal Healthcare - $3.7bn disposal of its generic branded prescription pharmaceuticals division to Abbott; Nicholas Piramal India Limited (now Piramal Healthcare Limited) - acquisition of Pfizer's Northumberland manufacturing plant; FTSE-250 speciality pharmaceutical company, BTG plc - £177m public takeover of Biocompatibles International plc; Lavendon Group plc - successful defence against a hostile approach from TVH Services NV and Ashtead Group plc; Lavendon Group plc - £250m debt refinancing and placing and open offer; GDF SUEZ - the world's largest utility company - disposal of the Logan Teleflex group of companies to Tokyo-listed company Daifuku; Commerzbank - disposal of Kleinwort Benson to RHJ International; United Company Rusal Limited and its largest shareholder, EN+ Group Limited - $14bn acquisition of a 25 percent stake in Moscow-listed copper and nickel miner Norilsk Nickel; Rusal Limited - $30bn combination with Sual and the alumina assets of Glencore International, to form United Company Rusal, the world's largest aluminium producer; Biopharmaceutical company, Protherics plc - acquisition by BTG plc.

Practice Areas

Corporate finance; M&A; Pharmaceuticals, biotechnology

Back to index

Legal Developments by:
Stephenson Harwood

  • Companies should plan now to minimise their pension protection levy

    The amount that pension schemes have to pay to the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) for the year 2006/07 may have increased by as much as five times the previous year's levy. Employers who ultimately bear the cost of many pension schemes will need to make plans now to ensure the levy payable for the year 2008/09 is kept to a minimum.
    - Stephenson Harwood

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Jersey Royal Court considers measure of damages for dilapidations claims

    In the absence of any statutory provision in Jersey addressing how dilapidations claims are to be quantified, the Royal Court's decision in JSSL v Barclays has provided some much needed guidance, particularly in circumstances where there is an acceptance that works to redress dilapidations have not been and will not be carried out.
  • English Supreme Court rules on Mistake and Hastings Bass

    On 9 May 2013 the English Supreme Court handed down a unanimous judgment on the seminal cases of Pitt-v- Holt and Futter -v- Futter , with Lord Walker's valedictory judgment conclusively resolving the English position on the rule in Hastings Bass and rescission on the ground of mistake.
  • Getting the breaks

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • Product liability and dietary supplements

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • The calm before 
the storm: are 
you prepared for 
a dawn raid?

    WilmerHale currently authors the Fraud and Corporate Crime section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • International shipment of waste: transporters beware

    Burges Salmon LLP currently authors the Environment and Energy section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here
  • Cyprus Shipping Industry : Business as usual. Why despite recent events Cyprus remains an internatio

    Cyprus is the third most populated island in the Mediterranean Sea. It is strategically located at the crossroads of Europe, Africa and the Middle East. Traditionally Cyprus has always been at the heart of the seafaring trade and therefore always functioned as an important centre for trade and commerce. Today as a member of the European Union it remains an optimal business base. It is one of the most attractive locations for foreign investments worldwide. Foreign companies have been given the opportunity to invest and establish business in Cyprus on equal terms with local investors as no distinction is made between foreign and Cypriot companies.
  • FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

    The excellent support system in combination with the ideal jurisdiction provided in Cyprus set the country in the list of the most desirable countries through which you can offer foreign exchange operations. In addition, the accession of Cyprus within the European Union and, most importantly, the extremely beneficial economic advantages available due to the low costs and the outstanding taxation, create a covetable environment for foreign investors.
  • National public order. Adoption of the Draft

    The Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation (hereinafter - SCC RF) adopted by the Informative Letter No. 156 dated the 26th of February, 2013 (hereinafter - the Informative Letter) on Review of the consideration by arbitrazh courts of the cases on the implementation of the public order clause as the ground for rejection of the recognition and enforcement of the foreign court decisions and arbitral awards.
  • China Customs New Interpretation

    For many products, tariff classification can be technically complex, confusing, and subject to multiple interpretations. Often several different Harmonized System Codes ("HS Code") may seem applicable for one given product with different tariff rates. Tariff classification is indeed a process of application of customs classification rules, including customs rulings and decisions, and misclassification may trigger severe legal consequences. The sad fact is, unfortunately, that many companies rely on non-legal professionals to determine the HS Codes for imports or exports. A recent interpretation issued by the General Administration of Customs of China ("GACC") (Circular No. [2012] 495 Shu-Fa-Fa) (the "Interpretation") reinforces the process of tariff classification as a legal matter, and formulates the test as to what counts for regulatory violation if tariff classification rules are improperly applied by the importer or exporter in a given case. If the legal defense is successful, misclassification may only be treated as a non-violation misclassification, with the possible obligation to pay up additional customs duties, if any, but without administrative or criminal consequences. The Interpretation took effect as from February 1, 2013.