The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Gilbert + Tobin

LEVEL 35, TOWER TWO, INTERNATIONAL TOWERS SYDNEY, 200 BARANGAROO AVENUE, BARANGAROO, AUSTRALIA
Tel:
Work +61 2 9263 4000
Fax:
Fax +61 2 9263 4111
Email:
Web:
www.gtlaw.com.au
Melbourne, NSW 2000, Perth
Gilbert + Tobin, Hanh Chau, NSW 2000, AUSTRALIA

Lawyer rankings

Hanh Chau

Tel:
Work Work +61 2 9263 4027
Email:
Gilbert + Tobin

Work Department

Tax.

Position

Hanh is a partner of the Gilbert + Tobin Tax group. Hanh has advised on the indirect tax consequences of a wide range of transactions such as infrastructure projects, asset and business sales, internal corporate reorganisations, takeovers and initial public offers, and major financing structures.

Career

Hanh Chau joined the Gilbert + Tobin Tax Group in January 2007, specialising in GST and stamp duty Australia-wide. Prior to this, she was at King & Wood Mallesons.

Education

Hanh graduated from the University of Sydney with a Bachelor of Commerce and Law (Honours) in 1998 and a Masters of Laws in 2004.


Australia

Tax

Within: Tax

Muhunthan Kanagaratnam heads the practice at Gilbert + Tobin and jointly with Hanh Chau advises Paladin Energy's bondholders and ad hoc creditor committee on the implications of the company’s restructuring following its administration. The team has been busy on the transaction front, advising Beach Energy on its A$1.58bn acquisition of Lattice Energy and assisting Pacific Equity Partners and The Carlyle Group with the acquisition of iNOVA Pharmaceuticals. Apart from M&A structuring, areas of focus include income and capital gains tax, stamp duty and corporate tax matters. Julian Lian and Matthew Charman joined from KPMG Law and EY Law respectively and Adam Musgrave has been promoted to special counsel. The team often works jointly with the firm's corporate advisory and banking and infrastructure practice groups. Peter Doyle joined from King & Wood Mallesons in July 2019.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • CommuniquĂ© on Equity Crowdfunding Is Officially Published

    By way of background, in January 2019, the Capital Markets Board (“ CMB ”) had issued an announcement on its website on the Draft CommuniquĂ© on Equity Crowdfunding [1] . The CMB has now officially published the CommuniquĂ© on Crowdfunding No. III-35/A (“ CommuniquĂ© ”), on October 3, 2019. The CommuniquĂ© entered into force as of October 3, 2019.
  • Beneficial Ownership Concept new interpretation from the Russian federal tax service

    The recent interpretative letter issued by the Russian Federal Tax Services (“FTS”) on 08th August 2019, has provided further guidance as to the application of the Beneficial Ownership Concept, further to the letter initially provided on the 12th of April 2018 which adopted a strict approach of the concept. 
  • Cyprus and Netherlands Double Tax Treaty Update

    Cyprus has concluded the negotiations for the avoidance of double taxation with the Netherlands. The double tax treaty was agreed at technocratic level in Hague. It is expected to be signed by the end of 2019 or early in 2020.
  • Vacancy - Senior Corporate Lawyer

    The Senior Corporate Lawyer, who will be reporting to Partners, will be working with both the firm’s legal team as well as the financial services team. The successful candidate will be requested to show initiative, take on certain responsibilities within the firm, work in a multinational environment and will immediately be given the opportunity to further advance their career within the law firm.
  • CJEU RULED ON THE APPLICATION OF THE BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP CONCEPT

    The judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on February 26, 2019, in the “Danish Beneficial Ownership Cases”, can be perceived as a landmark on the interpretation of the Beneficial Ownership concept under the Interest and Royalties Directive (IRD) and the Parent-Subsidiary Directive (PSD).
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‘centre of life test’ in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of  ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan   [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the “Regulations”). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess  Surinder Singh  cases that appear before them.
  • ITALIAN RULES ON JOINT VENTURES IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AND CONCESSIONS

    Italian rules on jointventures concerning public procurement and concession contracts are set out inlight of the European legal framework provided for in Directive 2014/23/EU and 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. The European rules aim to ensurethe best use of public money so that EU citizens benefit from strategicinvestments and services at fair prices. In this context, public procurementand concessions represent key instruments that need to be regulated and standardisedin order to ensure free movement of goods, freedom of establishment and freedomto provide services.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a  sole representative visa  is not “a  majority shareholder in the overseas business”.